I love Yannick, we swam for the same team when he was still in Nice so he has definitely always been a favorite of mine and someone I appreciate in and out of the pool. But I do think it very much matters that he hasnât been swimming very well for a while. I think it should be taken into account and itâll all depend on how many swimmers manage to reach the minima straightaway and therefore how many swimmers fight for those 6 spots. If there are many of the latter, Iâd rather see, say, someone like Jordan Coelho (200fly) who is regularly improving, swam only 0.02 from his PB and could step up in the next couple years, than Yannick who just isnât doing well lately. Itâs not because I donât like him - simply, as it is right now, I donât think heâs among the most deserving of a spot in Rio. Of course the huge problem with those French minima is that swimmers are expected to be in âolympicâ shape⊠months before the Olympics. But that, alas, cannot be changed. As for the 2nd/3rd debate, the question isnât whether he arrived 2nd (he obviously did) but whether he touched 2nd. That is what cannot be proven (because the perspective in video doesnât allow a clear answer and the difference between the pad and the manual clock was not considered sufficient), and whatâs causing this mess. Rugby fans are familiar with that situation with âtry or no tryâ - we canât prove you didnât score, but we canât prove you did. Itâs the same here with Yannick: they canât prove he did not finish second, but they canât prove he did either.
But Jordan Pothain has said if he was picked, he would step down and give Yannick his spot if asked: would that be possible? Besides, Jacques Favre has said âFor now the result stands. There is a time but itâs supposedly not correct. We will analyze everything and present the best possible team in Rioâ Hm. Does that sound like âweâll find a way to include Yannick if we want toâ or is it just me?
âI mean how do you decide how close is close enough to the minima to get picked? Does reputation and past results matter?â
I canât seem to get my hands on the document right now but itâs supposed to be a matter of percentage between the French minima and the actual time swimmers got. Supposedly the smaller that percentage is, the higher your chance to get called up. Anna Santamans, for example, is pretty certain to make the cut in the 50free because she swam 0.02 from the minima, so the percentage will be very small. A first squad should be announced next Wednesday. This federation being the mess it is, who fucking knows what theyâll do, maybe they wonât even follow their own rules, we just donât know.
Found the document again:
French nationals in Montpellier (March 29th-April 3rd 2016).
2. Rules for qualification in individual events
The olympic selection can include a maximum of two swimmers per individual event, limited to 26 female swimmers and 26 male swimmers.
2.1.1. The first two of each event will be qualified if they reach French minima during their final.
2.1.2. For events ranked by time (ex. 1500free), the two swimmers with the best times will be qualified if they reach French minima.
2.1.3. In case of equality between swimmers for point 2.1.1., the swimmer who swam faster in the series will be qualified.
2.1.4. In case of equality between swimmers for point 2.1.2., the swimmer who swims faster in that event at the European championships will be qualified.
2.2.1. At the end of French nationals, the federation can pick more swimmers at the following conditions:
2.2.1.1. Having reached olympic minima.
2.2.1.2. The choices for this list will be made based on a percentage that will show the swimmers closest to French minima.
2.2.1.3. In any case, this list cannot exceed 6 female swimmers and 6 male swimmers.