So,i kinda went on a sort of rant here,you can choose to ignore it or choose not to answer,depends on you,and I just want to say first of all,that I'm an atheist and I do think your blog is good
But on that topic,i think it's a bit harmful to speak disrespectfully of hindu scriptures and festivals while speaking of hindutva(I'm not talking about the quotes,more about the rants). Like,I saw an old post of yours,talking about how Krishna would've likely owned slaves,and,it made me remember people who call Mohammad a pedophile, it's based off of the scripture,yes,but you're not really listening to the religious people,i suppose?
Like,again, I don't mean to speak badly of you,but scriptures are still dear to people,and it's not like the Mahabharata is not a scripture,i mean,it contains the Gita,but calling people who disagree with you hindutvadis is pretty harmful in my honest opinion,as it's like you think that people who defend their own scriptures are extremists,and I'm just concerned that can reinforce beliefs like "hindutva is just people who speak against hinduphobia". Would you speak of the Quran or the Bible or any other holy texts like you speak of the Mahabharata?
What's respectful then? Tell us. Please give us a checklist. I'm tired of every person having different definitions of respect. Please give us a universal guideline.
We can be as respectful as possible and someone will still come out of the woodworks to tell us it's disrespectful. I could sit quietly in a blank room and my existence would be a problem to someone. There's literally no way to win here. We got this exact kind of anons in the beginning too even though we were posting strictly memes and quotes. What's the measure for respect then? Some people seem to think if we merely think of the epic as a literary text, it's disrespectful.
The goalpost for respect will keep shifting. Please tell us a way where everybody is pleased, I beg of you.
About the slavery discussion, I want to be clear, in the text, royalty own slaves. I want people to tell me what the religious significance or explanation for the slavery is. In fact, in this case, many religious people fully argue with their whole chest that some people were born to "serve" others. How do you contend with that? Do you nod your head politely and accept that? Is that respectful enough? If people have a hard time distinguishing between the character Krishna and the god Krishna, It's not our fault. It is a cognitive dissonance every person has to deal with themself.
What's the solution here? We should shut up about what we think on our own blog? We're not forcing anyone to read and watch anything.
We do not call everyone who disagrees with us hindutvavadi. If you come to us talking about a hindu rashtra and how hinduism is the supreme religion, then we call you a hindutvavadi. There's a DIFFERENCE. I sure hope people understand the difference between being hindu and being a religious nationalist.
What is with the whataboutism? "Would you criticise the Bible and the Quran?" Yeah, actually. I would. If I had anything beyond the base level knowledge of them, I'm sure I would have lots of opinions on it and would be talking about them. But in this life, I have extensive knowledge of a different literary piece and I talk about that. What about that is so hard to understand?
I feel like we say the same thing over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again and nobody listens.