no lasting death may be inflicted upon th corpse-heiressez ov th imp nationćprincess kittykat & princess jestressļ¼ļ¼
Not today Justin
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

izzy's playlists!
Mike Driver
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

šŖ¼
noise dept.
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

ē„ę„ / Permanent Vacation
Three Goblin Art
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

JVL

Origami Around

romaā

⣠Chile in a Photography ā£
seen from India
seen from United States

seen from T1
seen from Canada
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany

seen from Germany

seen from United States
@impiouslyprincessez
no lasting death may be inflicted upon th corpse-heiressez ov th imp nationćprincess kittykat & princess jestressļ¼ļ¼

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Itās a shame that all these posts and videos about āthe best places to bleed out!!ā ā10/10 bleed out spotā Are about dying in some war or something. When it could and should be about letting a beautiful and sadistic trans woman slit your throat and wrists and bleeding out on her lap.
hungrybox_sobbing_as_he_is_abducted_by_aliens_but_their_tractor_beam_leaves_his_shoes_behind.jpg
Look at his expression of agony. Hungrybox didn't kill himself.
does a demongirl even count as a monstergirl? were more humanoid than most others but at the same time its not like demons are humans...
americans constructing racial segregation laws: so imagine a burger

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
warning! warning! catagory "five" princess "bweh" event detected! millions dead, estimated casualties upwards of hundreds of millions!
many of you
if my rice cooker was a woman i would be conflicted about fucking her. id try to like romance her a little, you know? go on a few dates and learn about her interests. it'd feel really bad to try to get up her skirt as soon as i saw her just because i want her extremely badly
has anyone considered that it was probably her house too. where else was she supposed to put her chintz?
in service of my favorite pastime, taking a joke feminist analysis of a joke post too far to be a joke anymore:
not only is the house hers too. but does SHE even really want the chintz? or is the chintz part of her duty as a wife, a design choice made for the approval of in-laws and houseguests, part of keeping the home as it's expected to be? is "he" actually having his Primal Masculinity restricted by his wife's Feminine Sensibilities, or is she an easy scapegoat now that he's consciously experiencing the effects of the restrictive society that she's been dealing with the whole time?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
fucking crazy that fromsoft made one single elden ring dlc and it's about how detransition will kill your soul
also it's about how receiving dragon communion is a viscerally erotic experience
my biggest complaint about the elden ring dlc is that there is (and please correct me if I'm wrong) no sif-style cutscene change for malenia if you kill miquella before facing her. it sucks so hard that they figured that out in dark souls 1 and then seemingly forgot how awesome it was
honestly with malenia we kinda think that part ov the tragedy ov her story iz that she haz no way ov knowing if miquella iz alive or dead and will continue to wait for him either way & her knowing u killed miquella would kinda undermine tht imoćwhat we really wouldve liked personally in termz ov "base game character reactionz to DLC" would be like, melina mourning messmer & giving us a little peak into their dynamic az siblingz, ditto for rennala and rellana, & ranni reacting to the metyr situationćguess part ov the issue iz tht by th point in th average playthrough where most begin the DLC melina & ranni (along with much of the rest of the cast) are no longer interactable characterz
power washes half of you
do u think jets of ppwerful water make my hard as fuck rock puppy body more loveable
do u want me y/n
maybe if you were fully powerwashed. you look kinda stupid half clean
thats ok+makes a lot of sense because that's how it's always been so don't concern yourself so much with me ok ill be a ok im used to as fuck looking like a stupid animal that doesn't know how to get much or any love
plus also my stone heart prolly doesn't need any love none at all so don't even worry about my self ok? if you are you gotta stop because it's just no matter at all
+ the smell is likely not so good on the unwashed half so that's not helping alot and the tears i like to cry probably also don't look good or ncie
what is wrogn with me
and aslo i was lying about the tears i never figured that out maybe thats why no one is nice to me even when imso miserable
like truly why should i have some special care for the full-time 'independent artist' as though they're more important than any other artist and more specially worthy of consideration in my politics than any other business owner? i thought art came free with our humanity! some of the best artists i've ever known do it on the side of their full time job for little to no money
Calling gig workers who specialize in visual arts "small business owners" is unbelievably funny to me. Like we probably have way more in common with the proletariat of Marx's time then your friends working full time... you know that right?
Actually what do you do for a living? Is it full time? You get benefits per chance? Are you really more primed for revolution than the artist struggling to keep their head above water? Because I was working fast food and retail before the combination of chronic pain, PTSD and auditory processing just made it impossible to hold down employment. Because frankly I don't feel less desperate or exploited now than I did then.
I don't feel any more connection or empathy with the bourgeoisie or like I want to be like them. If anything the desperation has made me more hungry for change. But hey you aren't going to listen. You clearly treat theory like doctrine and refuse to actually consider the shift in relationships to labor over the past 200 years let alone consider the material conditions of the so called "small business owners" you think are unworthy of political consideration.
To say nothing of the fact that you have every consideration for disability when it comes to protecting hobbyists from criticism but absolutely no consideration for disability when it comes to disabled people who rely on being a "small business" to survive under capitalism. It just doesn't make you sound like someone genuinely class conscious or interested in meaningfully improving people's material conditions.
I despise leftists like you, frankly.
I don't understand how its hard to understand that artists are selling their LABOR when they work by commission. I'd think that would be obvious but y'know. You don't seem terribly interested in engaging with anything. Just "IP bad GRRRR" and neglecting that the way most independent artists make money isn't actually by selling IP but their labor... and yknow... I feel like you might be putting them in the wrong fucking category in your head.
Alienating an artist from their work by taking it and claiming it as your own isn't a threat to an artist because you are taking their "property" its because you are alienating them from the product of their own labor and hence any future opportunities to sell that labor. AI does the same thing AT SCALE and its being sold by...yknow... ACTUAL businesses.
It's not doctrinaire to recognize the differences between the proletariat and petit bourgeoisie. By refusing to make this distinction, you are making a very common mistake wherein you are presenting the interests of the petit bourgeoisie as if they are proletarian interests. Labor is not a commodity. Labor cannot be bought or sold. You can sell the products of your own labor, and you can sell your own labor-power, but you cannot sell labor. The class that makes a living selling the products of their own labor is the petit bourgeoisie. The class that makes a living selling their own labor-power is the proletariat.
The class distinction between proletariat and petit bourgeoisie is not one about individual material outcomes or political leanings. There are landlords who are barely scraping by. There are wealthy business owners who are communists. But that doesn't change their class position. When Marxists say that the petit bourgeoisie is not a revolutionary class, it is not an indictment of its members or a declaration that the petit bourgeoisie as individuals can never be committed revolutionaries. It is merely the observation of the position of the petit bourgeoisie as a class in decline relative to the ascending proletariat within capitalism. The petit bourgeoisie continue to split into either proletarians or bourgeoisie, despite membership within the petit bourgeoisie continuing to be an attractive prospect for bourgeois-aspirant proletarians.
There is nothing morally wrong with running a small business to survive. If someone is making their living making keychains and selling them on Etsy, that doesn't make them a bad person. But they're not a proletarian. Someone who buys raw materials, uses their labor to turn them into something else, and then sells the resulting products is straightforwardly a petit bourgeois artisan, regardless of how poor they are or how much of a communist they are. They are not selling their labor-power, they are selling the products of their labor in competition with other products on the market. A proletarian, on the other hand, does not make a living selling any products. They make their living selling their labor-power to capitalist employers. It is their employer who owns and sells the products of their labor.
This doesn't become an outdated paradigm in the context of modern visual art. A freelance illustrator who works on contract for various projects is a proletarian. They don't own or sell the products of their labor and they don't expect to. They come into a project, work as part of a team, get their paycheck, and then someone else owns the final work as IP and profits from it. In contrast, an independent visual artist who sells art directly to consumers is petit bourgeois. They are selling the products of their labor on the market in competition with other producers of art.
As a result, the petit bourgeois visual artist has a fundamentally different relationship to IP than a proletarian visual artist does. The petit bourgeois artist by default holds the copyright to the art they create. They can sell the rights, they can sell copies, but most importantly they have the legal right to prevent other people from making unauthorized copies of any works they hold the rights to. This legal monopoly exists to bolster the profitability of IP ownership.
Now we come to the crux of your argument. Does AI image generation "alienate" indie artists from the products of their labor "at scale"? It's unclear what exactly you mean here.
A person could use an AI image generator to plagiarize particular works, but the model itself won't do that unprompted. If I tell the AI to make the Mona Lisa, that painting is famous enough for most models to overfit it and reproduce it somewhat accurately, but if I tell it to make an oil painting of a smiling woman with brown hair, it's going to give me novel images unrelated to the Mona Lisa or to any other such painting in existence. The concept of AI image generation as an "automated plagiarism machine" is not accurate. The influence of any particular image in the training data on the final model's weights are far too minuscule for any generic output to be realistically considered plagiarism.
On the other hand, the use of AI as a replacement for labor is a much more realistic concern. Employers and consumers alike are enamored with the idea of a machine that can create art at the fraction of the cost of human artists. So doesn't this mean that proletarian and petit bourgeois artists should be united in this front against the threat of AI? Not exactly.
Proletarian artists are at risk of getting hired less and earning less money if their employers decide to use AI image generation to replace some or all of their art needs. Their interests lie in preventing layoffs and wage cuts that could result from the unrestricted use of AI in the workplace. Petit bourgeois artists, on the other hand, are at risk of consumers choosing AI art over their own art. Their interests lie in preventing competition from AI in the consumer market and preserving their particular market niche.
So while both groups seem to face the same threat on the surface, the different ways in which they are threatened lead to different approaches to combating that threat. While proletarian artists have the opportunity to organize and negotiate particular contracts with their employers, petit bourgeois artists don't have that opportunity. That's why you see petit bourgeois and bourgeois artists both fighting to limit access to and development of open source and consumer-level AI image generation software via accusations of gross copyright violation and proposals to expand the scope of copyright.
Since proletarian artists don't own any IP and don't benefit from copyright, they don't have any dog in these particular fights. Even if Disney wins against Midjourney in court, it's not like Disney's employees will see any benefits. Disney could still train their own AI model on the vast amounts of IP that Disney has the rights to and their employees would still be at risk of being laid off and replaced by AI. Petit bourgeois indie artists on the other hand would benefit from consumers losing access to a popular image generation tool and thus there being less competition for art on the market.
This is why class distinctions are important in these discussions. They help us to determine what exactly motivates particular perspectives on AI and IP law and what we should advocate for if we are to advocate for the interests of the proletariat. Attacking the existence of AI as a technology, accusing it of being a plagiarism machine or an art thief or a violator of copyright, and advocating for expanded copyright protections are all petit bourgeois positions that do not align with the material interests of the proletariat.
the world hates nocturnal girls
in addition to the things people already have said in the tags, it would be nice for girls with heat sensitivity (like us) to be able to go outside at night during warmer months when it may be a lot cooler. however, due to safety concerns and/or basically nowhere being open at night (where we live at least), this is not feasible. it should be feasible because you can literally just hire workers who prefer night time work but i guess fuck anyone who wants to work but cant do it during the day
I recently read this post by Devon Price which details its experience of coming off testosterone, and found various aspects of it quite grating. I have admired Price for several years, after reading its book Unmasking Autism which totally reframed the way I understood myself, and also occasionally reading its posts which I found comforting, since in those days I wasn't on Tumblr and encountering reasonable takes on transmisogyny from (what I then considered to be) a transmasculine perspective was rare and valuable to me. So I was surprised to read this article and feel so negative about it. (The post is 6 months old now, so I expect I may be rehashing old ground by bringing it up, but I've only been on Tumblr a few weeks and I never saw it brought up in the various other online or irl trans spaces I was in at the time so I thought I'd put my thoughts down anyway.)
The post discusses how Price had been on T for around 7 years, and fully passed as a man in public, only to to realise that it felt dysphoric from both its physical appearance and social position. It is now undergoing what it describes as a "transition/detransition/retransition/whatever the fuck you want to call it," by reverting to endogenous estrogen augmented with estrogen cream, it/its pronouns, and being "whatever the fuck I am from moment to moment, and accepting that it wonāt be instantly recognizable". That's great.
My eyebrows were raised, though, by Price's saying "I think my transition has some real commonalities with those of trans women and trans feminine people," such as, "feeling joyful at being freed from the expectations of masculinity, even as it means encountering sexism a lot more," and, "though I will never be targeted by transmisogyny in the ways that my trans sisters are,Ā I will never disavow you or my proximity to you, and I will use my new position to speak over sexist trans men and smack down other ignorant TMEs even louder." Hmm.
One has to wonder what "new position" Price is referring to here? It describes in the post itself how coming off testosterone and identifying away from manhood has reduced its social status, resulting in being treated less seriously in social situations. How could a lowering in social position empower Price to speak louder against sexist trans men? Surely another trans man is better placed to do that than any kind of non-man. The only way this statement makes sense is if Price is referring to an increased proximity to trans womanhood by virtue of the change in identity and hormone profile. I think this is reinforced by "I will never be targeted by transmisogyny in the ways that my trans sisters are," having the unspoken corollary "but I am targeted by transmisogyny all the same."
One has to read the rest of the post to find where these supposed commonalities with the transfeminine experience lie. Much space is devoted to physiological changes like skin-softening or muscle-loss (both relatable to transfems, but not really The Point) or else to improvements in vaginal health and the regaining of fertility. Talking about these could, I suppose, be construed as in poor taste given the assertion that it is a similar experience to transfems, but I am inclined to give Price the benefit of the doubt here given that it is principally a post about changes coming off T, and these are important changes, albeit ones which if anything demonstrate how different Price's "retransition" is to a transfeminine transition.
The only particular change mentioned in the post that mapped onto transfemininity was that of increasingly facing misogynystic street harassment and harassment born of the intersection between misogyny and racism, although it's hard to see how these are transfeminine experiences rather than generic experiences of those-perceived-as-women.
The real meaning, I guess, of Price's "I think my transition has some real commonalities with those of trans women and trans feminine people," comes in the list of things that haven't changed. Thicker body hair, facial hair, a lower voice, and some facial masculinisation stand out as examples that might be relatable to trans women. But whatever "commonalities" these could represent are rather hampered by the assertion that these changes are "lifelong or long-lasting, and thankĀ godĀ for that; I would not be as content in my funny little de-man-sition if I wasnāt holding onto some of my most coveted changes." So it is similar to a transfeminine transition in that there is e.g. facial hair, but Price does not find that facial hair distressing nor particularly want to get rid of it, nor apparently does it need to get rid of it (beyond shaving) to be read as cis female in public. As a trans woman who wants to get rid of her facial hair, who feels intense dysphoria whenever she sees it, but whose facial hair is so thick that it looks like a 5-o'clock-shadow even immediately after shaving plus a layer of concealer, I cannot say I see any commonality between Price's experience and my own.
I think, if anything, Price's post demonstrates how unlike a transfeminine transition its experience has been. One part of the post which stood out was a paragraph about Price's apparently frequent hours-long masturbation sessions. And while I think it's great that people can talk about this, and have no issues at all with Price doing so, I think if a trans woman was employed as a Professor at a prestigious educational institution like Loyola University there is no way she would risk writing something like that on her public blog. (And incidentally, I did check to see if there were any trans women employed at Loyola and could not find any, but cannot ofc be sure of that as a fact.)
Other similar examples crop up throughout the post. While living as a man, Price states that, "most hookups were surprised that I didnāt have a penis when they brought me home." Again, that's amazing, it would be great if we could all live in this world where we didn't feel that we might be murdered or imprisoned for bringing a hook-up home without disclosing our genital configurations, but some of us don't live in that world.
On another occasion Price refers to feeling free to behave again how it did as a child. "My friends and I behaved exactly like this when we were growing up. I have missed it. Being a swaying, fidgety, thousand-yard-staring girlie who eloped through public space like she owned it," it says, followed by, "as a man, I felt this kind of behavior was completely inaccessible." Given the context of this coming after Price's claim that its "retransition" gave it insight into the transfeminine experience, I find this reference to girlhood (plus the understanding that those given the social role of "man" are punished for behaving this way) to be somewhat unpleasant. "Walking down the street, I sing along to my music at full volume and feel more okay beingĀ seen," it adds. That's great, when I was 4 months into my transition I would wear a hoodie with the hood up no matter the temperature and speak as quietly as possible to avoid drawing attention to the very masculine features that Price is so proud of retaining.
A particularly odd paragraph is used to explain the increase in sexism faced by Price after no-longer identifying as a man. Price states that it had been using the term "detransition" when presenting as a man, and no-one objected. But as soon as it underwent its own "detransition" it started to get backlash from transfeminists calling it a "grifter". Price characterises this as a non-man being criticised for something a man can do with impunity, and therefore sexism. But this characterisation of transfeminists' behaviour hardly makes any sense. The idea that transfeminists are more lenient to men than they are to non-men (even those who do not face transmisogyny) is totally absurd and bears no resemblance to reality. Is it not much more likely transfeminists consider statements about "detransition" from a trans person to be far less notable or worthy of critique than statements made on that topic by a "detransitioner"? Price's framing of its "fellow trans feminists" as misogynistic is also a more-than-a-little concerning in light of everything else.
But really, all of these things I've mentioned were not the main source of my discomfort with this post. That came when Price said this:
After many years of trying, it seems to me that āmanhoodā amounts to mostly this: harnessing the power that one holds over other people, particularly women, and repressing oneās weakness so that societal power does not go away.
And yeah, there's a lot of truth in that, but how did Price not know this already? To fully succeed at being a man requires you to oppress. Many an uncracked egg was transmisogynised in her youth because of her failure to oppress. I am one of those. Even well before puberty, I was telling off other boys for making sexist jokes or comments, the result of which was bullying, social exclusion and early-onset transmisogyny. I failed to be a man before I could even get started, because you are not allowed to fully be a man if you don't partake in the oppression of women.
Price says, "I was centered, uplifted, listened to, and respected when I was on T," but I was also "on T" (endogenously) and would've publicly referred to myself as a man for two decades and I was never centered, uplifted, listened to, or respected. Being "centered" is a two-way street: people give you the opportunity to take up space that could have been taken by someone else, and you take it. But in the taking of it you are centering yourself, you are a collaborator in your own centering. Testosterone doesn't magically give you "male privilege", it gives you the option of taking that privilege. And if you take that option rather than refusing it, even if you relent after some years, it says something about your character. To be clear, it is possible to be a man and be a good person, but that involves actively refusing to be centered and uplifted above women, it involves actively making yourself smaller so that women can be uplifted instead. And it seems it took Price a surprising amount of time to come to this realisation for a self-described transfeminist.
Devon Price is not a man, but all the same it was able to be a much better man than I ever was. It was able to reap the rewards of male privilege that I was never allowed to access. Devon Price is not a woman, but it is treated as a woman in society, and specifically treated as a cis woman, something I will also never be allowed to access. Price's article purports to demonstrate commonalities with the experiences of trans women, but what it actually shows is that society allows people like Price to choose between being treated as a man or as a woman, but society allows transfeminine people neither of those options.
Price states that after having experienced the social role of 'woman' and the social role of 'man' it now feels like neither, rather it feels like "a living object or eternal fantastical creature existing beyond the human inventions of species, sex, or age". And here is revealed what is really meant by being exempt from transmisogyny: it is the freedom to exist beyond the human invention of sex. Some of us aren't allowed to exist there: we want to, but we're banned. This post is written from the place we're banned from entering, while also telling us it knows how we feel and shares in our struggle. Thanks, Devon, that really means a lot...
the recent puppygirl discourse aside for a moment, you may find this post interesting (archive for posterity) some segments of the post: -------
------- these are all from the same post devon reblogged, please click the link for full context but i wanted to include a couple screencaps to give an idea what we're dealing with here.
I hate to be inflammatory but i was SHOCKED to see it had reblogged something like this nobody seemingly said... anything? until someone mentioned it to me in private when i was talking about some of its writings. (well not really that shocked, its hard to be surprised by this stuff anymore, but the overtness coming from someone whos written on transmisogyny, and the total lack of reaction, is upsetting)
I find myself wondering if its blog should even be marked green at this point. Maybe im misunderstanding its reasons for reblogging this post but it looks like pretty explicit transmisogynist fearmongering to me :(
That post makes for some really grim reading. I don't know anything about Tumblr history, but it seems kontext maschine was a legendary blogger who died in 2023, one who Devon Price seemingly admired a lot.
His post amounts to saying that he socially transitioned briefly in the 90s, but stopped because he wouldn't be able to have the life of cis girl, and it is implied that his quality of life would be reduced by transition. And later he describes how he loves his male body in a way that has "nothing to do with orgasm".
It's hard to tell if he has considered that there are women whose quality of life is improved by transition (in spite of the transmisogyny he seems to be loosely aware of) because their pre-transition life was so awful. Seeing him say he realised transition "wouldn't bring [him] anything like the experiences of [his] female classmates" seemed a really odd framing to me, until I realised that it suggests he was having a normal cis guy childhood at the time and was just interested in trying out womanhood, but realised it was inaccessible. That's why his life would get worse with transition: it was already fine.
Rationally I know this is how a lot of transphobes think trans women's lives are, but it seems so odd to see it written down like this, it's so alien to any transfem experience I've ever heard. All he has realised is that he is a cis guy and not a trans woman š¤·. The jibe about orgasm is clearly just a bigoted reference to autogynephelia doesn't even deserve to be addressed.
The post by rame tarin that he's replying to is even stupider. The idea that "eggers" are not aware that some people are cis is absurd, just assuming a total incapability for rational thought on behalf of your ideological opponents. Maybe encouraging many people to transition is a rational strategic move in response to a cisnormative society that encourages everyone not to transition? Maybe they are already aware that some people who are just cis guys might be caught up in it. Maybe they don't care, because they're cis guys, and the wellbeing of cis guys does not need to be prioritised by trans women. Just the arrogance of these posters to post about things they barely understand at all, and which they talk about with a tone of great authority.
The fact that Price reblogged this, and more generally that it seems to greatly admire a blogger who made jibes about autogynephelia, is honestly more concerning than anything I've read on its Substack. I'm inclined to be be much less charitable to Price after seeing this, thanks for bringing it to my attentionš

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Frantically googling "gift ideas for 6 year old girls" like a deadbeat aunt because idk what ages actually correlate to behaviour and interest wise and it's my age regressor girlfriend's birthday in three days.
Ok so the state of child gendering is absolutely bleak and no one is making it out of this fucked world undamaged.
nostril is a lovely sexual orifice for a beautiful, seductive woman named "brain parasite"
she can't get in and feels intimidated because an incredibly expensive sex worker named "yayo" keeps using it instead