Malignant diseases
ABSTRACT:
In the last years of the previous century, I encountered some books that reported proves that energy intake was (positively) associated with malignancy over vascular risks. Prevention was obtained by a mean 30% energy intake decrease. The book of reference 1 was repeatedly printed and published, but it is not alone.
Up to recent days, a 30% lifelong decrease of energy intake seemed as prohibitive in humans. This may be the explanation of the poor spread of the information on the association between cancer and energy intake. We have published that meals promoted by Initial Hunger (IH) may be “easily” trained and eliminate insulin resistance. This is accomplished by a loss of about 30% energy intake. Part of population does even not require the suggestion for a change in intake. After training, about a third of investigated adults or toddlers maintained the energy intake, Blood Glucose (BG), Resting Metabolic Rate (RMR) and insulin sensitivity that they had at recruitment. The implementation of a meal pattern where meals are induced by IH is quite easy (IH meal pattern or IHMP) in past experience. Part of population adopts and maintains this meal pattern by free choice. Objectively, the adoption of Initial Hunger Meal Pattern (IHMP) creates a different life. Table 1 reports effects on energy metabolism, Table 2 reports effects on insulin sensitivity and Body Mass Index (BMI). At recruitment, the investigated population presents individuals that have mixed levels of energy availability
Further details @ https://www.ijbio.com/
For more details @ https://www.ijbio.com/articles/malignant-diseases.pdf


















