Irina

I really hate when people say this because when everyone comes out and chews your ass out then you want to play victim. We don’t really care if the site is her or not. She does porn the copyright claim blew her cover and this girl isn’t big enough to have someone got steal her pic to put on a porn site. She likes to hide in plain sight on the internet so don’t be fool.

I’ve said this from the beginning: I do believe there is a child. I just believe that child is his — and his alone. I still don’t believe she is the mother.

First of all, these two are rarely ever seen together in a genuine, natural setting. Every time we see them together, it’s because of an event, an appearance, or something that gives them a reason to be in the same place. There are basically no candid, normal, everyday pictures of them simply existing as a couple.

Second, if he really is married to her and they really do have a child together, then I’m sorry, but he comes across as a terrible husband and a terrible father. And I genuinely don’t understand her either, because what woman would willingly accept being treated like this?

This is a man who has never seemed particularly ashamed or afraid to publicly acknowledge the women he was involved with before. Even with Jenny, who was a married woman, he didn’t act like he needed to hide the relationship. But with this girl? If he could put her inside a bag so nobody could see her, I honestly think he would.

So yes, he may have confirmed the child. I was actually expecting that, so I’m not shocked by it at all. But confirming that a child exists doesn’t suddenly make everything else add up for me.

There are still too many things that don’t make sense.

I could absolutely be wrong, but as of right now, the math still isn’t mathing. Sorry.

🌈

BUT ....

Riddle me this, why are you screaming privacy and yet someone printed your kid's supposed birth doc and took a photo and sent it to TMZ ?

That wouldn't even get past TMZ's authorizations process. When TMZ obtains a birth doc it's usually directly from the government site, not a PIC of one on a table.

Why did they alter the article multiple times and pull the document image out of it with no explanation?

That all still STINKS

No government clerk is gonna risk their federal benefits for that idiot like that and why are you crying to ENT claiming you got them fired? But you won't ask for real privacy in an article?

Yes, exactly. The feedback we’ve seen across other social media supports this, and locals who genuinely attended are calling out the two blogs for spreading misinformation, especially since neither blogger was present.

My face listening to audio I STILL cannot hear.

I’m not saying he said it. I’m not saying he didn’t. I’m saying I cannot hear a clear statement in that video, and apparently people who were actually in the room didn’t hear it either. I also find it interesting that something this significant supposedly happened at a public Q&A and there wasn’t an immediate wave of reporting about it.

I thought we finally had a clear answer yesterday. I was wrong about how clear that video was. But I’m also not accepting someone else’s interpretation of garbled audio as fact just because they heard what they wanted to hear.

Give me clean audio. Give me an unaltered video. Give me a direct quote I can actually hear.

I was just saying IF he said it, which I'm with this mod I don't actually clearly hear him saying it and it doesn't match up with any of the other behavior and zero articles have said anything, which is suspicious.

Re: Is it because we are looking at a split where she isn’t the mom?

My first thought when I heard that he confirmed it on stage (which I don’t believe for a second) was that the only possible way he currently has a child is through adoption as a single dad (or had a child with someone else). This entire scenario with Miss “she’s a New Yorker now” is so unbelievable that I’m amazed his team is still trying to push it on people.

He doesn't have a daughter or anything. That's ridiculous.

Where are the posts, tweets, threads, blogs, tabloids, People articles that have a clear video of that statement being made? I’ve not seen any. Just a jankily filmed bit that has the audio cut and the lips not matching the words.

Maybe we really need to look at the IG that originally posted it and remember how crazed they are and have been known to make stuff up in the past.

I only needed him to confirm, I was not going to celebrate/ congratulate him on being a father without him saying it

And yet…still haven’t found shit?

So, comparatively, the personal-life handling looks even more peculiar: months of ambiguity, inflammatory fan-blame allegations in the gossip ecosystem, and then—if the extended clip is authentic—a barely audible off-mic statement about a child rather than a clean factual sentence.

His surrounding publicity ecosystem has tolerated an enormous amount of ambiguity while simultaneously treating relatively trivial professional ambiguity—“am I in the Marvel movie?”—as something requiring careful management.

And that is backwards in terms of stakes.

A Marvel casting secret is ultimately marketing. A child, marital status, allegations of cheating, purported divorce material, and allegations against fans affect real people's reputations. You would normally expect greater precision around the latter, not less.

That's why the off-mic whisper, assuming that's genuinely what happened, doesn't really solve the mystery for me. It almost illustrates it.

He had a microphone.

He was already speaking publicly.

He could have said one unmistakable sentence if he wanted the public record changed. Instead, the alleged acknowledgment occurs softly away from the microphone, leaving some people convinced they heard it, others saying they didn't, entertainment outlets not reporting it, and the same verification argument continues.

That is not how you communicate when your objective is clarity.

It is how communication can look when the objective is maintaining flexibility: enough for one audience to take reassurance from it, but not enough to force the team into a comprehensive explanation of the marriage, the pregnancy/birth narrative, the other-woman story, or the preceding ten months.

There appears to be a deliberate distinction between what they are willing to let become formally attributable and what they are willing to let remain suggestive.

Marvel return? Formal, recorded, quotable.

Ring? Visible but interpretive.

Possible daughter reference? Sounds whispered off-mic.

Marriage status? Unaddressed. Ring doesn't answer anything

The video you hear him "But there are other priorities" and "i have a daughter " quietly at the same time...

WHAT THE ACTUAL HELL ?

GIRL