Untitled

"Goshfrog, that's a joke thread!" When is it ever funny to joke about adults and children in a romantic relationship?

Furthermore,

Requesting a fanfic where you, an adult, are on a date with a child? When has this ever been okay? Am I in the Twilight Zone?

After getting banned, Triagonal made use of a loophole in order to continue making contact with the child. I can't say for sure if the child had Triagonal blocked before this, but their reply makes me believe that they were not happy to be contacted by Triagonal. The fact Triagonal had to exploit a loophole in order to contact the child makes this obviously much more sinister. Moreover, why would an adult ever invite a child to a discord server while describing the goings on as 'steamy goodness'? A phrase that is used to describe adult content.

Now, jumping back up just a little bit, "Everybody else misunderstood what I was doing." That sound familiar, doesn't it? Where have we heard such a sentiment before, I wonder? The child in question also has some words on Triagonals inappropriate behavior Some word salad that boils down to "It's not my fault if you guys misinterpret the romantic phrases I use towards a child"

Let me start with this. It's "boohoo", not "booboo". "Booboo" can mean either one of two things, either a wound you got on the playground or (more likely, since you're using it to refer to a person) Yogi Bear's sidekick. "Boohoo" is the sound of crying (I'm not sure what heck of a language uses "boohoo" for that, but people use it that way). Rest assured, I passed the captcha to prove I'm not a bear.

Second, let me just get out of the way that whoever you blocked you can tell the people on KF and AA aren't alts of any of us who you haven't blocked. You officially have that power now. That conspiracy theory can be put to rest. I know Cat was looking for ways to determine who was who.

Third, let me get to the point.

It's not raising the required amount of evidence to point out that sharing the same three things from more than half a decade ago across multiple PSA's as if it's a gamechanger each time does make some of you sound like broken records, especially when showing words proves what the words said and not what was going on behind them.

I would not feel concerned to say this had I not been dragged into this by people who think I'm her.

It's also worth noting the two accounts which are said to be the "victim" are not even the same. They're not the same person. There's a ton of Dans in the forums. The two people don't even have the same browser fingerprint. Triagonal is friends with one of them.

What do you even call it "a loophole" based on? Do you... have proof of this? Do you have proof it was a bug and not a feature? Did the Team account ever clarify that at some point? Or are you interpreting? Because a lot of this has always been interpretive. Hence why many of you think I'm her.

But more to the point, you're taking verbal technicalities (especially the chat-related one, which I should note could've been fabricated by anyone with fonts and a blank template, if we're getting technical) across scarce moments in time and saying you know what the people were thinking. Strong speculation is still speculation. You got a whole vibe from the word "steamy", and that says something.

Looking at a screenshot is evidence of the context of what's being said like looking at the moon's craters is evidence of it being made of cheese. In other words, analogically, it's not. That's speculative at best.

You wouldn't last a day in court if you tried. That's why so many of you resort to vigilantism. Which is why victims of vigilantism are so glued to the law as a philosophy.

It was an allusion to how both of you think it's fine to equate multiples of us on our side while you all deny being the same person. To quote Artists Aware, "this street goes both ways; if it is good enough for you and yours, it should be good enough for the next person too". It's also Triagonal's logic too, except she doesn't claim any of you are the same.

It was also a remark towards your claim of "trying so hard". As far as I know, Triagonal doesn't have seven whole bulletins (four in KF) against a single individual on your side.

It's pointless because, one, it doesn't necessarily make someone a predator, and two, every time this comes up, it's the same couple of things from six years ago. People who are acting normally would treat people based on their outstanding deeds and misdeeds. They wouldn't do it based on a label, let alone one someone doesn't identify with, let alone one applied to that person after more time has passed to maybe check and see if the person has changed (if they ever were a predator).

I have seen people tell her before "get help" out of this same grudge you display. "Help" would be therapy, right? And then what? Is it being asked of her with full knowledge that it wouldn't lead to any improved harmony with each community? It has been said she enjoys counseling for OCD as well as possibly histrionic personality disorder, both things which suffice as alternatives to what you think she is and which are both treatable and people can live with without being disorderly.

"Goshfrog, that's a joke thread!" When is it ever funny to joke about adults and children in a romantic relationship?

Furthermore,

Requesting a fanfic where you, an adult, are on a date with a child? When has this ever been okay? Am I in the Twilight Zone?

After getting banned, Triagonal made use of a loophole in order to continue making contact with the child. I can't say for sure if the child had Triagonal blocked before this, but their reply makes me believe that they were not happy to be contacted by Triagonal. The fact Triagonal had to exploit a loophole in order to contact the child makes this obviously much more sinister. Moreover, why would an adult ever invite a child to a discord server while describing the goings on as 'steamy goodness'? A phrase that is used to describe adult content.

Now, jumping back up just a little bit, "Everybody else misunderstood what I was doing." That sound familiar, doesn't it? Where have we heard such a sentiment before, I wonder? The child in question also has some words on Triagonals inappropriate behavior Some word salad that boils down to "It's not my fault if you guys misinterpret the romantic phrases I use towards a child"

Let me start with this. It's "boohoo", not "booboo". "Booboo" can mean either one of two things, either a wound you got on the playground or (more likely, since you're using it to refer to a person) Yogi Bear's sidekick. "Boohoo" is the sound of crying (I'm not sure what heck of a language uses "boohoo" for that, but people use it that way). Rest assured, I passed the captcha to prove I'm not a bear.

Second, let me just get out of the way that whoever you blocked you can tell the people on KF and AA aren't alts of any of us who you haven't blocked. You officially have that power now. That conspiracy theory can be put to rest. I know Cat was looking for ways to determine who was who.

Third, let me get to the point.

It's not raising the required amount of evidence to point out that sharing the same three things from more than half a decade ago across multiple PSA's as if it's a gamechanger each time does make some of you sound like broken records, especially when showing words proves what the words said and not what was going on behind them.

I would not feel concerned to say this had I not been dragged into this by people who think I'm her.

It's also worth noting the two accounts which are said to be the "victim" are not even the same. They're not the same person. There's a ton of Dans in the forums. The two people don't even have the same browser fingerprint. Triagonal is friends with one of them.

What do you even call it "a loophole" based on? Do you... have proof of this? Do you have proof it was a bug and not a feature? Did the Team account ever clarify that at some point? Or are you interpreting? Because a lot of this has always been interpretive. Hence why many of you think I'm her.

But more to the point, you're taking verbal technicalities (especially the chat-related one, which I should note could've been fabricated by anyone with fonts and a blank template, if we're getting technical) across scarce moments in time and saying you know what the people were thinking. Strong speculation is still speculation. You got a whole vibe from the word "steamy", and that says something.

Looking at a screenshot is evidence of the context of what's being said like looking at the moon's craters is evidence of it being made of cheese. In other words, analogically, it's not. That's speculative at best.

You wouldn't last a day in court if you tried. That's why so many of you resort to vigilantism. Which is why victims of vigilantism are so glued to the law as a philosophy.

It was an allusion to how both of you think it's fine to equate multiples of us on our side while you all deny being the same person. To quote Artists Aware, "this street goes both ways; if it is good enough for you and yours, it should be good enough for the next person too". It's also Triagonal's logic too, except she doesn't claim any of you are the same.

It was also a remark towards your claim of "trying so hard". As far as I know, Triagonal doesn't have seven whole bulletins (four in KF) against a single individual on your side.

It's pointless because, one, it doesn't necessarily make someone a predator, and two, every time this comes up, it's the same couple of things from six years ago. People who are acting normally would treat people based on their outstanding deeds and misdeeds. They wouldn't do it based on a label, let alone one someone doesn't identify with, let alone one applied to that person after more time has passed to maybe check and see if the person has changed (if they ever were a predator).

I have seen people tell her before "get help" out of this same grudge you display. "Help" would be therapy, right? And then what? Is it being asked of her with full knowledge that it wouldn't lead to any improved harmony with each community? It has been said she enjoys counseling for OCD as well as possibly histrionic personality disorder, both things which suffice as alternatives to what you think she is and which are both treatable and people can live with without being disorderly.

"Goshfrog, that's a joke thread!" When is it ever funny to joke about adults and children in a romantic relationship?

Furthermore,

Requesting a fanfic where you, an adult, are on a date with a child? When has this ever been okay? Am I in the Twilight Zone?

After getting banned, Triagonal made use of a loophole in order to continue making contact with the child. I can't say for sure if the child had Triagonal blocked before this, but their reply makes me believe that they were not happy to be contacted by Triagonal. The fact Triagonal had to exploit a loophole in order to contact the child makes this obviously much more sinister. Moreover, why would an adult ever invite a child to a discord server while describing the goings on as 'steamy goodness'? A phrase that is used to describe adult content.

Now, jumping back up just a little bit, "Everybody else misunderstood what I was doing." That sound familiar, doesn't it? Where have we heard such a sentiment before, I wonder? The child in question also has some words on Triagonals inappropriate behavior Some word salad that boils down to "It's not my fault if you guys misinterpret the romantic phrases I use towards a child"

Let me start with this. It's "boohoo", not "booboo". "Booboo" can mean either one of two things, either a wound you got on the playground or (more likely, since you're using it to refer to a person) Yogi Bear's sidekick. "Boohoo" is the sound of crying (I'm not sure what heck of a language uses "boohoo" for that, but people use it that way). Rest assured, I passed the captcha to prove I'm not a bear.

Second, let me just get out of the way that whoever you blocked you can tell the people on KF and AA aren't alts of any of us who you haven't blocked. You officially have that power now. That conspiracy theory can be put to rest. I know Cat was looking for ways to determine who was who.

Third, let me get to the point.

It's not raising the required amount of evidence to point out that sharing the same three things from more than half a decade ago across multiple PSA's as if it's a gamechanger each time does make some of you sound like broken records, especially when showing words proves what the words said and not what was going on behind them.

I would not feel concerned to say this had I not been dragged into this by people who think I'm her.

It's also worth noting the two accounts which are said to be the "victim" are not even the same. They're not the same person. There's a ton of Dans in the forums. The two people don't even have the same browser fingerprint. Triagonal is friends with one of them.

What do you even call it "a loophole" based on? Do you... have proof of this? Do you have proof it was a bug and not a feature? Did the Team account ever clarify that at some point? Or are you interpreting? Because a lot of this has always been interpretive. Hence why many of you think I'm her.

But more to the point, you're taking verbal technicalities (especially the chat-related one, which I should note could've been fabricated by anyone with fonts and a blank template, if we're getting technical) across scarce moments in time and saying you know what the people were thinking. Strong speculation is still speculation. You got a whole vibe from the word "steamy", and that says something.

Looking at a screenshot is evidence of the context of what's being said like looking at the moon's craters is evidence of it being made of cheese. In other words, analogically, it's not. That's speculative at best.

You wouldn't last a day in court if you tried. That's why so many of you resort to vigilantism. Which is why victims of vigilantism are so glued to the law as a philosophy.

It was an allusion to how both of you think it's fine to equate multiples of us on our side while you all deny being the same person. To quote Artists Aware, "this street goes both ways; if it is good enough for you and yours, it should be good enough for the next person too". It's also Triagonal's logic too, except she doesn't claim any of you are the same.

It was also a remark towards your claim of "trying so hard". As far as I know, Triagonal doesn't have seven whole bulletins (four in KF) against a single individual on your side.

It's pointless because, one, it doesn't necessarily make someone a predator, and two, every time this comes up, it's the same couple of things from six years ago. People who are acting normally would treat people based on their outstanding deeds and misdeeds. They wouldn't do it based on a label, let alone one someone doesn't identify with, let alone one applied to that person after more time has passed to maybe check and see if the person has changed (if they ever were a predator).

I have seen people tell her before "get help" out of this same grudge you display. "Help" would be therapy, right? And then what? Is it being asked of her with full knowledge that it wouldn't lead to any improved harmony with each community? It has been said she enjoys counseling for OCD as well as possibly histrionic personality disorder, both things which suffice as alternatives to what you think she is and which are both treatable and people can live with without being disorderly.

"Goshfrog, that's a joke thread!" When is it ever funny to joke about adults and children in a romantic relationship?

Furthermore,

Requesting a fanfic where you, an adult, are on a date with a child? When has this ever been okay? Am I in the Twilight Zone?

After getting banned, Triagonal made use of a loophole in order to continue making contact with the child. I can't say for sure if the child had Triagonal blocked before this, but their reply makes me believe that they were not happy to be contacted by Triagonal. The fact Triagonal had to exploit a loophole in order to contact the child makes this obviously much more sinister. Moreover, why would an adult ever invite a child to a discord server while describing the goings on as 'steamy goodness'? A phrase that is used to describe adult content.

Now, jumping back up just a little bit, "Everybody else misunderstood what I was doing." That sound familiar, doesn't it? Where have we heard such a sentiment before, I wonder? The child in question also has some words on Triagonals inappropriate behavior Some word salad that boils down to "It's not my fault if you guys misinterpret the romantic phrases I use towards a child"

Let me start with this. It's "boohoo", not "booboo". "Booboo" can mean either one of two things, either a wound you got on the playground or (more likely, since you're using it to refer to a person) Yogi Bear's sidekick. "Boohoo" is the sound of crying (I'm not sure what heck of a language uses "boohoo" for that, but people use it that way). Rest assured, I passed the captcha to prove I'm not a bear.

Second, let me just get out of the way that whoever you blocked you can tell the people on KF and AA aren't alts of any of us who you haven't blocked. You officially have that power now. That conspiracy theory can be put to rest. I know Cat was looking for ways to determine who was who.

Third, let me get to the point.

It's not raising the required amount of evidence to point out that sharing the same three things from more than half a decade ago across multiple PSA's as if it's a gamechanger each time does make some of you sound like broken records, especially when showing words proves what the words said and not what was going on behind them.

I would not feel concerned to say this had I not been dragged into this by people who think I'm her.

It's also worth noting the two accounts which are said to be the "victim" are not even the same. They're not the same person. There's a ton of Dans in the forums. The two people don't even have the same browser fingerprint. Triagonal is friends with one of them.

What do you even call it "a loophole" based on? Do you... have proof of this? Do you have proof it was a bug and not a feature? Did the Team account ever clarify that at some point? Or are you interpreting? Because a lot of this has always been interpretive. Hence why many of you think I'm her.

But more to the point, you're taking verbal technicalities (especially the chat-related one, which I should note could've been fabricated by anyone with fonts and a blank template, if we're getting technical) across scarce moments in time and saying you know what the people were thinking. Strong speculation is still speculation. You got a whole vibe from the word "steamy", and that says something.

Looking at a screenshot is evidence of the context of what's being said like looking at the moon's craters is evidence of it being made of cheese. In other words, analogically, it's not. That's speculative at best.

You wouldn't last a day in court if you tried. That's why so many of you resort to vigilantism. Which is why victims of vigilantism are so glued to the law as a philosophy.

It was an allusion to how both of you think it's fine to equate multiples of us on our side while you all deny being the same person. To quote Artists Aware, "this street goes both ways; if it is good enough for you and yours, it should be good enough for the next person too". It's also Triagonal's logic too, except she doesn't claim any of you are the same.

It was also a remark towards your claim of "trying so hard". As far as I know, Triagonal doesn't have seven whole bulletins (four in KF) against a single individual on your side.

It's pointless because, one, it doesn't necessarily make someone a predator, and two, every time this comes up, it's the same couple of things from six years ago. People who are acting normally would treat people based on their outstanding deeds and misdeeds. They wouldn't do it based on a label, let alone one someone doesn't identify with, let alone one applied to that person after more time has passed to maybe check and see if the person has changed (if they ever were a predator).

I have seen people tell her before "get help" out of this same grudge you display. "Help" would be therapy, right? And then what? Is it being asked of her with full knowledge that it wouldn't lead to any improved harmony with each community? It has been said she enjoys counseling for OCD as well as possibly histrionic personality disorder, both things which suffice as alternatives to what you think she is and which are both treatable and people can live with without being disorderly.

*added note at bottom*

Emily has been full throttle on her lies for the last few weeks. She's been claiming that the screen shots are fake, that AI has been used, and that different accounts were never hers. (Defyinggravity, EruzaArto, WillowtheWay, etc).

She fluctuates between claiming they are innocent, to claiming that it was never her and those are scam accounts. For the record, she is lying.

Since she loves to lie so much, how about we show the archive for some of these posts.

For the one that is right above here, here is the archive link and here is the DA post.

I know, it came out blurry, so how about the link to the archive, so you can see it better, for yourselves. https://archive.ph/E0Tnk

As you can see in the image above, she confesses in this, that those are her old account names.

And in case she starts to lie about the fact that she used the username Superbiaamoris, her YT is still up and running. I did grab the archive for it, though it doesn't quite show all the videos right, it does show enough to prove it's her.

As for her claim that she was not TigerLily/TigerLR, well she posted up on Reddit, under her EruzaArto account (which she lied about and claimed it wasn't hers), that has the secondary name of u/TigerLR. In a couple of her posts, she has links to a photo, showing her face. Yup, it's a confirmation that really is her.

You want something better than a screenshot? Ok, how about the Wayback Machine?

Never ever forget rule #1. Emily lies and Emily has been doing nothing but lying about her past. All the claims that it's AI or fake screenshots, are all lies she tells because she does not want to face the consequences of her own toxic behavior. She is an art thief, a liar, a cyberbully, a stalker, abusive, a pe**-enabler, and she's highly toxic.

Color me not surprised she is still trying to lie. Ok, let's show some channels then.

She claims she doesn't do Disney edits and has not done them since she was a kid. I don't think she was a kid 3 years ago, when she was on Defyinggravityagain or 1 year ago, when she was on Superbiaamoris. Here are the receipts.

Her Defying account, with her showing in the upper left corner of the screen, so you can see her drawing. This was 3 years ago. But the disney edit, where is it?

Here it is, with the Defyinggravityagain name and the date, including her addressing the Disney Editing community about her being caught stealing from other artists in the group.

Emily discussing the arttheft thread over on Reddit, which she has been banned from, over 45+ times.

Here is the Superbiaamoris account on Youtube. This was a year ago and oh look, there are disney edits showing in there. In the upper middle row, there she is, in person, once more plagerizing Lamby's centaur.

Here is one more, showing her under the Superbiaamoris account.

And here is her present channel, still tagging disneyedits, one month ago.

These are all her, under different names, at different times. All of her denials about using those usernames, are all lies she has done, to try to hide all the toxic behavior she has done to others.

Her denial about disney edits, it's all a lie. This next image is from the actual Disney Editing community, about her. They do mention her usernames in there and a warning about her. (This is from 2019, but it still applies to her and it shows why she wants to erase her past, since she is a well-known problematic individual)

Everywhere Emily has gone, she has gaslighted, manipulated, stalked, and attempted to bully people. When caught, she falls back on her favorite habit, she lies. Her own Aunt, in a live stream, has admitted that Emily lies about everything. She will contort herself almost into a pretzel with her lies, in order to avoid the consequences of her own actions.

Right now, she's been raging and claiming that the evidence against her is either 1) photoshopped, 2) AI, or 3) she was hacked. She has attempted to falsely claim that many of the user names she has used in the past were either not hers at all or her accounts were hacked and she lost them.

Emily has not been hacked, with the exception of only one small account, over on Twitter. (No, it was not any of us, it appears to be some rando who did it.)

The user names she is denying, are actually hers. WillowtheWay, Defyinggravityagain (and the many different versions of that), Tigerlily, etc., have all been hers.

She is known for losing passwords, because she has admitted, in the past, that has happened to her. Once more, no hacking there.

Someone smarter and more organized than me, put together a little list of names that have been used by Emily, here on Tumblr. There is more, but this gives you an idea on what she's like.

She has denied using Defyinggravityagain...

Her using the Defyinggravityagain as a watermark, on her FB account.

Her on Tigerlily, back in the old DEC forum. If you take a closer look at the title of this thread, it contains several of her user names, including Tigerlily and her first name.

When she dumped the Tigerlily name to EruzaArto but kept the same imagery on there, so that we could tell that it was still her. (The moment she opens her mouth or starts to type, you have no doubts it's her, the hobgoblin) If you look up at the post just over hers, especially at the highlighted part, you can see she was caught in some more lies, by the old forum mod, as well. Always remember Rule #1. Emily lies.

More of her using Defyinggravity again, but with a space this time. Also worth noting, her facebook url kept changing. She was playing around with that for a bit, claiming that she was forced to and then later, she tried to claim it was proof of her being hacked. (She wasn't)

E. has repeatedly attempted to claim to be an ally to the LGBTQAI+ community, as far back as 2019. The real truth is, she is anything but an ally. In Second Life, on the DEC forum, on her blogs, on her different media platforms, she has come out with some of the worse statements pertaining to the LGBTQAI+ community. She has been repeatedly told, by many individuals, to knock off the hate comments, but she just refuses to stop.

The original statement in this post, which is from Discord, was made back in June 14, 2019. She's calling trans individuals weird but her defense is that she claims to call herself weird, so it's ok, right?

Back in May 2026 (this year), she went on a rampage. I don't know what put her on this train wreck of transphobia or bigotry, but she went full in and was posting statements like this over on Discord, DeviantArt, Tumblr, Bluesky, and Twitter (X). Later, she attempts to claim she is part of the community and an ally. Someone please make it, make sense?

Then came her whole, "prove it!" stage, where she demanded people prove that they were having periods. If, from the wording, it sounds like she showed off her own, she did. She recorded, showing everything and posted it. There was a whole "ewww" sound, that was done around the internet, on that one.

Now she has made many claims of being part of the community, being pansexual (though she doesn't appear to understand what that means), and that gives her the right to make these types of rants. However, she has never been accused of going after anyone of her same gender, just after men, usually married men.

She claims she doesn't date online but that didn't stop her from going after men in Second Life, before she was permanently banned from the grid. Same theme though, for each guy, which is they were not single and had a partner. When she was confronted about repeatedly doing this, she suddenly started to claim she was just roleplaying and that she wasn't into dating online and when that was not believed, she claimed she was pansexual, so she didn't go after men. (The Willow comment she makes at the end, I will touch on, in another post.)

"Goshfrog, that's a joke thread!" When is it ever funny to joke about adults and children in a romantic relationship?

Furthermore,

Requesting a fanfic where you, an adult, are on a date with a child? When has this ever been okay? Am I in the Twilight Zone?

After getting banned, Triagonal made use of a loophole in order to continue making contact with the child. I can't say for sure if the child had Triagonal blocked before this, but their reply makes me believe that they were not happy to be contacted by Triagonal. The fact Triagonal had to exploit a loophole in order to contact the child makes this obviously much more sinister. Moreover, why would an adult ever invite a child to a discord server while describing the goings on as 'steamy goodness'? A phrase that is used to describe adult content.

Now, jumping back up just a little bit, "Everybody else misunderstood what I was doing." That sound familiar, doesn't it? Where have we heard such a sentiment before, I wonder? The child in question also has some words on Triagonals inappropriate behavior Some word salad that boils down to "It's not my fault if you guys misinterpret the romantic phrases I use towards a child"

Let me start with this. It's "boohoo", not "booboo". "Booboo" can mean either one of two things, either a wound you got on the playground or (more likely, since you're using it to refer to a person) Yogi Bear's sidekick. "Boohoo" is the sound of crying (I'm not sure what heck of a language uses "boohoo" for that, but people use it that way). Rest assured, I passed the captcha to prove I'm not a bear.

Second, let me just get out of the way that whoever you blocked you can tell the people on KF and AA aren't alts of any of us who you haven't blocked. You officially have that power now. That conspiracy theory can be put to rest. I know Cat was looking for ways to determine who was who.

Third, let me get to the point.

It's not raising the required amount of evidence to point out that sharing the same three things from more than half a decade ago across multiple PSA's as if it's a gamechanger each time does make some of you sound like broken records, especially when showing words proves what the words said and not what was going on behind them.

I would not feel concerned to say this had I not been dragged into this by people who think I'm her.

It's also worth noting the two accounts which are said to be the "victim" are not even the same. They're not the same person. There's a ton of Dans in the forums. The two people don't even have the same browser fingerprint. Triagonal is friends with one of them.

What do you even call it "a loophole" based on? Do you... have proof of this? Do you have proof it was a bug and not a feature? Did the Team account ever clarify that at some point? Or are you interpreting? Because a lot of this has always been interpretive. Hence why many of you think I'm her.

But more to the point, you're taking verbal technicalities (especially the chat-related one, which I should note could've been fabricated by anyone with fonts and a blank template, if we're getting technical) across scarce moments in time and saying you know what the people were thinking. Strong speculation is still speculation. You got a whole vibe from the word "steamy", and that says something.

Looking at a screenshot is evidence of the context of what's being said like looking at the moon's craters is evidence of it being made of cheese. In other words, analogically, it's not. That's speculative at best.

You wouldn't last a day in court if you tried. That's why so many of you resort to vigilantism. Which is why victims of vigilantism are so glued to the law as a philosophy.

"Goshfrog, that's a joke thread!" When is it ever funny to joke about adults and children in a romantic relationship?

Furthermore,

Requesting a fanfic where you, an adult, are on a date with a child? When has this ever been okay? Am I in the Twilight Zone?

After getting banned, Triagonal made use of a loophole in order to continue making contact with the child. I can't say for sure if the child had Triagonal blocked before this, but their reply makes me believe that they were not happy to be contacted by Triagonal. The fact Triagonal had to exploit a loophole in order to contact the child makes this obviously much more sinister. Moreover, why would an adult ever invite a child to a discord server while describing the goings on as 'steamy goodness'? A phrase that is used to describe adult content.

Now, jumping back up just a little bit, "Everybody else misunderstood what I was doing." That sound familiar, doesn't it? Where have we heard such a sentiment before, I wonder? The child in question also has some words on Triagonals inappropriate behavior Some word salad that boils down to "It's not my fault if you guys misinterpret the romantic phrases I use towards a child"

Let me start with this. It's "boohoo", not "booboo". "Booboo" can mean either one of two things, either a wound you got on the playground or (more likely, since you're using it to refer to a person) Yogi Bear's sidekick. "Boohoo" is the sound of crying (I'm not sure what heck of a language uses "boohoo" for that, but people use it that way). Rest assured, I passed the captcha to prove I'm not a bear.

Second, let me just get out of the way that whoever you blocked you can tell the people on KF and AA aren't alts of any of us who you haven't blocked. You officially have that power now. That conspiracy theory can be put to rest. I know Cat was looking for ways to determine who was who.

Third, let me get to the point.

It's not raising the required amount of evidence to point out that sharing the same three things from more than half a decade ago across multiple PSA's as if it's a gamechanger each time does make some of you sound like broken records, especially when showing words proves what the words said and not what was going on behind them.

I would not feel concerned to say this had I not been dragged into this by people who think I'm her.

It's also worth noting the two accounts which are said to be the "victim" are not even the same. They're not the same person. There's a ton of Dans in the forums. The two people don't even have the same browser fingerprint. Triagonal is friends with one of them.

What do you even call it "a loophole" based on? Do you... have proof of this? Do you have proof it was a bug and not a feature? Did the Team account ever clarify that at some point? Or are you interpreting? Because a lot of this has always been interpretive. Hence why many of you think I'm her.

But more to the point, you're taking verbal technicalities (especially the chat-related one, which I should note could've been fabricated by anyone with fonts and a blank template, if we're getting technical) across scarce moments in time and saying you know what the people were thinking. Strong speculation is still speculation. You got a whole vibe from the word "steamy", and that says something.

Looking at a screenshot is evidence of the context of what's being said like looking at the moon's craters is evidence of it being made of cheese. In other words, analogically, it's not. That's speculative at best.

You wouldn't last a day in court if you tried. That's why so many of you resort to vigilantism. Which is why victims of vigilantism are so glued to the law as a philosophy.

the lore thickens.. O_O I was sent a message regarding "Lambydal?" this seems to match the photo on the Reddit. she has a history on Encylopedia Dramatica. below she is confessing to editing and not drawing her own lines.

an illustration of the character Abigail (often called "Abby") from the animated series "Stealing From Sis: Wedding Bells". [1]

No you can't. Kiwifarms isn't practicing medicine. Nobody on KF is claiming to be a licenses medical doctor. Specifically, nobody in your thread is claiming to be a licensed medical doctor while prescribing you anything. You do not know what the fuck you're talking about. As per fucking usual.

Kiwifarms and nobody on Kiwifarms is committing medical malpractice. Which, by the by, is one word, you dunce. "In trouble" also isn't hyphenated. It's just "In trouble" Distributing your medical information via text or images is not medical malpractice as nobody who is posting about your medical information is a doctor, nor are they pretending to be one. It's therefor (which is one word, Emily) not a violation of HIPPA either.

When your medical history is brought up, it is

Speculation

Hyperbole, a joke, or sarcasm

People have sued under such circumstances before. I'm not even saying that to defend myself, that's just fact, a tidbit I thought was relevant enough to share. I say that because there's a difference between poking fun and making claims, in this case about medical history. Now making claims under the guise of poking fun? That's... no different actually. Not in disputes at least. That's what the people on DA used to say to justify people with 1000 ban evasion accounts coming back, like Caggon, if they wanted to claim it was different from someone like Kiricia coming back. I spoke to the people on Buzzly who the people on KF dragged into the conflict via screenshots and they agree.

Also, you don't have to be a doctor to commit medical malpractice. I would say that's a silly thing to think is true, but then it dawned on me you might be a black market surgeon trying to be an apologist for your job because you have a family to feed (not being a doctor must mean you're not committing medical malpractice). Ah well, at least there's hope that at least one of you out there follows the Hippocratic Oath; actual doctors don't tend to anymore.

No you can't. Kiwifarms isn't practicing medicine. Nobody on KF is claiming to be a licenses medical doctor. Specifically, nobody in your thread is claiming to be a licensed medical doctor while prescribing you anything. You do not know what the fuck you're talking about. As per fucking usual.

Kiwifarms and nobody on Kiwifarms is committing medical malpractice. Which, by the by, is one word, you dunce. "In trouble" also isn't hyphenated. It's just "In trouble" Distributing your medical information via text or images is not medical malpractice as nobody who is posting about your medical information is a doctor, nor are they pretending to be one. It's therefor (which is one word, Emily) not a violation of HIPPA either.

When your medical history is brought up, it is

Speculation

Hyperbole, a joke, or sarcasm

People have sued under such circumstances before. I'm not even saying that to defend myself, that's just fact, a tidbit I thought was relevant enough to share. I say that because there's a difference between poking fun and making claims, in this case about medical history. Now making claims under the guise of poking fun? That's... no different actually. Not in disputes at least. That's what the people on DA used to say to justify people with 1000 ban evasion accounts coming back, like Caggon, if they wanted to claim it was different from someone like Kiricia coming back. I spoke to the people on Buzzly who the people on KF dragged into the conflict via screenshots and they agree.

Also, you don't have to be a doctor to commit medical malpractice. I would say that's a silly thing to think is true, but then it dawned on me you might be a black market surgeon trying to be an apologist for your job because you have a family to feed (not being a doctor must mean you're not committing medical malpractice). Ah well, at least there's hope that at least one of you out there follows the Hippocratic Oath; actual doctors don't tend to anymore.

"Goshfrog, that's a joke thread!" When is it ever funny to joke about adults and children in a romantic relationship?

Furthermore,

Requesting a fanfic where you, an adult, are on a date with a child? When has this ever been okay? Am I in the Twilight Zone?

After getting banned, Triagonal made use of a loophole in order to continue making contact with the child. I can't say for sure if the child had Triagonal blocked before this, but their reply makes me believe that they were not happy to be contacted by Triagonal. The fact Triagonal had to exploit a loophole in order to contact the child makes this obviously much more sinister. Moreover, why would an adult ever invite a child to a discord server while describing the goings on as 'steamy goodness'? A phrase that is used to describe adult content.

Now, jumping back up just a little bit, "Everybody else misunderstood what I was doing." That sound familiar, doesn't it? Where have we heard such a sentiment before, I wonder? The child in question also has some words on Triagonals inappropriate behavior Some word salad that boils down to "It's not my fault if you guys misinterpret the romantic phrases I use towards a child"

Let me start with this. It's "boohoo", not "booboo". "Booboo" can mean either one of two things, either a wound you got on the playground or (more likely, since you're using it to refer to a person) Yogi Bear's sidekick. "Boohoo" is the sound of crying (I'm not sure what heck of a language uses "boohoo" for that, but people use it that way). Rest assured, I passed the captcha to prove I'm not a bear.

Second, let me just get out of the way that whoever you blocked you can tell the people on KF and AA aren't alts of any of us who you haven't blocked. You officially have that power now. That conspiracy theory can be put to rest. I know Cat was looking for ways to determine who was who.

Third, let me get to the point.

It's not raising the required amount of evidence to point out that sharing the same three things from more than half a decade ago across multiple PSA's as if it's a gamechanger each time does make some of you sound like broken records, especially when showing words proves what the words said and not what was going on behind them.

I would not feel concerned to say this had I not been dragged into this by people who think I'm her.

It's also worth noting the two accounts which are said to be the "victim" are not even the same. They're not the same person. There's a ton of Dans in the forums. The two people don't even have the same browser fingerprint. Triagonal is friends with one of them.

What do you even call it "a loophole" based on? Do you... have proof of this? Do you have proof it was a bug and not a feature? Did the Team account ever clarify that at some point? Or are you interpreting? Because a lot of this has always been interpretive. Hence why many of you think I'm her.

But more to the point, you're taking verbal technicalities (especially the chat-related one, which I should note could've been fabricated by anyone with fonts and a blank template, if we're getting technical) across scarce moments in time and saying you know what the people were thinking. Strong speculation is still speculation. You got a whole vibe from the word "steamy", and that says something.