Unbetitelt

.

Stop using the word paralysis unless we actually mean paralysis

The root comes from the greek words para and lyein

para: (“beside”, “next to” but also in the sense of “similar to”, “false”, “resembling”)

lyein: to loosen/loose

ergo, "paralysis" just means “besides loss” or “next to loss“ as in “similar to loss” or “something like loss” or “abnormal loss” or “fake loss” (as in non permanent loss)

SO the “temporary loss” or “short term loss” of something

Which is extremely fitting for ADHD executive dysfunction because the whole “yesterday I/you could do it”- thing is one of the most frustrating parts/accusations of ADHD

.

.

.

.

Those are not my literal physical muscles in my limbs, which paralysis actually hits.

Our results provide the first demonstration that dopamine can directly control movement by manipulating somatic motoneuron behavior and skeletal muscle tone.

It IS actually, very likely, our actual physical muscle that is fucked up from our ADHD

Etymology Latin, from Greek, from paralyein to loosen, disable, from para- + lyein to loosen — more at lose

.

.

3 : a state of powerlessness or incapacity to act

3 : (...) incapacity to act

@glorioustidalwavedefendor hey, can you stop shoving the multiple definitions of MY OWN FUCKING CONDITIONS on my post? Paralysis is not my fucking ADHD. Paralysis is when my left arm won't move on its own. When I have to force my left leg into the bathtub. It is not my executive dysfunction temporarily telling me I'm frozen in motion. I can't just break out of my spasticity the way I can my ADHD. Also, Classyflame has a form of paralysis too.

There is a misunderstanding here

I did not mean to say that the ADHD and your hemiplegia are the same thing

They are very obviously two different conditions!

I am sorry, I did not make that clear enough

I apologize

My point was purely about etymology, since I thought it might make it less frustrating for you, if other people use the word to describe their executive dysfunction

.

.

.

.

The paper was not supposed to mean that your hemiplegia is caused by ADHD.

Of course not!

That would be rediculous!

I posted it becasue to me it was something new – no one had eve told me, that my ADHD could have real physicall results, like muscle pain/tension (which explained a few things ... )

I just wanted to share that new knowledge with you

.

Stop using the word paralysis unless we actually mean paralysis

The root comes from the greek words para and lyein

para: (“beside”, “next to” but also in the sense of “similar to”, “false”, “resembling”)

lyein: to loosen/loose

ergo, "paralysis" just means “besides loss” or “next to loss“ as in “similar to loss” or “something like loss” or “abnormal loss” or “fake loss” (as in non permanent loss)

SO the “temporary loss” or “short term loss” of something

Which is extremely fitting for ADHD executive dysfunction because the whole “yesterday I/you could do it”- thing is one of the most frustrating parts/accusations of ADHD

.

.

.

.

Those are not my literal physical muscles in my limbs, which paralysis actually hits.

Our results provide the first demonstration that dopamine can directly control movement by manipulating somatic motoneuron behavior and skeletal muscle tone.

It IS actually, very likely, our actual physical muscle that is fucked up from our ADHD

Etymology Latin, from Greek, from paralyein to loosen, disable, from para- + lyein to loosen — more at lose

.

.

3 : a state of powerlessness or incapacity to act

3 : (...) incapacity to act

Here's what I need you to do:

If you see a post with a "mature content" label, and it's 2026, DM me a link to the post.

Yes, that's really it.

I am hoping to collect several thousand such posts, so that I have a decent sized dataset. I do not care what the post is about; if it's labeled as "mature content", I want to add it to my dataset.

This is always a surreal experience, since that wiki page only exists because I had a fight with an overzealous wiki editor who deleted the entire chart back during the pandemic. I persuaded him to make a separate page for the chart instead, but if that hadn’t happened, one of the only places we would be able to go to look at the Franklin expedition crew list would be arctonauts.com, where you can find an even more complete version of the muster roll.

If the Personnel wiki page ever does get taken down by some even more aggressive wiki editor, we’re going to need arctonauts, and if you want to write polar fiction or polar scholarship about other voyages (like James Clark Ross’s sexy Antarctic adventure), arctonauts has you covered in a way no wiki ever will. There are also letters and publications by polar explorers and legal documents that contain heartbreaking information, like the fact that James Fitzjames left everything he owned to his adoptive brother, whom he calls “my best beloved Friend William Coningham.”

Ignoring the fact that Nicky wasn't herself while doing it and that no one considers that WW84 plot fine (and that WW isn't a villain but a victim of poor writing here) notice how they never complain like that about male villains.

Male villains always get a pass because they're cool and iconic or some shit so they practically never get criticised the way female ones do, even when their reasons for being villains are selfish and petty and they do far worse things.

Whoever is the op complaining about female villains , that included Nicky.

Firstly nothing she did was her fault , all those actions were done by wish Nicky and she herself was a victim. Bear is the villain bot her , stop the victim blaming.

Secondly , loki has never been let' s off the hook.

Every villain reason for hurting others is selfish only of you think about it , his reason too came from trauma just like jean and wanda.

But he did pay the consequences and was thrown in jail in isolation for a year. (And the original sentence was a death sentence btw) then later did every fucking thing possible for redemption at a much higher scale than anyone (include only marvel character others I don't know). Yet in his series and movies in a lot of moment he get knocked down by others unless you are fine with the writers turning wanda and jean pain into a joke and making the audience think that they had good life actually but it was only their fault and their own very "selfish " goal for power that they hurted others.

I've seen people defending Thanos more than Loki, but he's not up there for some reason.

.

Also

Becasue we are?

Our society is very much O.K. with murder depending on who comits them ...

Social murder (translated from the German term sozialer Mord) is a concept used to describe unnatural or premature deaths that occurs due to preventable problems in social, political, or economic systems, rather than the direct violence often associated with murder. The term originally specifically described deaths due to problems stemming from working conditions under capitalism, the term has since expanded to include preventable deaths due to systemic issues other than ones believed to be inherent under capitalism.

.

Why are we telling our youth that some crimes are justified - depending on who commits them?

What!? What!? What!? Why are condescending repeating Nikki was possessed as if it's some justifying excuse. That is literally central to horror of the movie, both in that this new personality taken over her body and that her real self is trapped unable to escape as she can only make fleeting pleas to be killed. This isn't her, that's the point, that's the horror. OP complains about WW84 but Nikki while possessed, while unable to consent has her body used for sex.

do us all a favor Byl Holte and don't talk about stuff you haven't watched.

OP shouldn't have included Loki, godsdamnit. It's been over a decade and we've been fighting in the trenches. Loki has always been damned and called the worst by the narrative,

Honestly, I think in a lot ways, not all, but in a lot of ways, Loki is reacted to and treated is like female character would be treat. The way he is dismissed and treated as over-emotional, the way it's made his responsible to take care of others emotional need, the way it his job to be the support but never the hero and even narratively his deaths treated, feel very typical of the "Women in refrigerator" trope in which his death is really for other characters to react.

The Loki fandom because it is so prominently women is often looked down on and dismissed. Explanation and discussions of Loki are shot down as with defenses female characters'

He is worse then a women

-> hot women can be forgiven for being villains (see for example Lady Dimitrescu)

Loki is an unfuckable women

What do I mean by that?

This was written about Bucky but I feel like it works just as well for Loki:

Why? WHY wasn’t that included in the movie T_T?

Why not both?

He says Odin was weak for not killing Loki, so he clearly sees it as wrong to not kill your enemies baby

But he also left Loki alone wenn he was still so little

A baby that is so small can die just by being left alone

The LGBTQ community has seen controversy regarding acceptance of different groups (bisexual and transgender individuals have sometimes been marginalized by the larger community), but the term LGBT has been a positive symbol of inclusion and reflects the embrace of different identities and that we’re stronger together and need each other. While there are differences, we all face many of the same challenges from broader society.

In the 1960′s, in wider society the meaning of the word gay transitioned from ‘happy’ or ‘carefree’ to predominantly mean ‘homosexual’ and was an umbrella term that meant anyone who wasn’t cisgender or heterosexual. The community embraced the word ‘gay’ as a mark of pride.

The modern fight for queer rights is considered to have begun with The Stonewall Riots in 1969 and was called the Gay Liberation Movement and the Gay Rights Movement.

The acronym GLB surfaced around this time to also include Lesbian and Bisexual people who felt “gay” wasn’t inclusive of their identities. 

Early in the gay rights movement, gay men were largely the ones running the show and there was a focus on men’s issues. Lesbians were unhappy that gay men dominated the leadership and ignored their needs and the feminist fight. As a result, lesbians tended to focus their attention on the Women’s Rights Movement which was happening at the same time. This dominance by gay men was seen as yet one more example of patriarchy and sexism. 

In the 1970′s, sexism and homophobia existed in more virulent forms and those biases against lesbians also made it hard for them to find their voices within women’s liberation movements. Betty Friedman, the founder of the National Organization for Women (NOW), commented that lesbians were a “lavender menace” that threatened the political efficacy of the organization and of feminism and many women felt including lesbians was a detriment.

In the 80s and 90s, a huge portion of gay men were suffering from AIDS while the lesbian community was largely unaffected. Lesbians helped gay men with medical care and were a massive part of the activism surrounding the gay community and AIDS. This willingness to support gay men in their time of need sparked a closer, more supportive relationship between both groups, and the gay community became more receptive to feminist ideals and goals. 

Approaching the 1990′s it was clear that GLB referred to sexual identity and wasn’t inclusive of gender identity and T should be added, especially since trans activist have long been at the forefront of the community’s fight for rights and acceptance, from Stonewall onward. Some argued that T should not be added, but many gay, lesbian and bisexual people pointed out that they also transgress established gender norms and therefore the GLB acronym should include gender identities and they pushed to include T in the acronym. 

GLBT became LGBT as a way to honor the tremendous work the lesbian community did during the AIDS crisis. 

Towards the end of the 1990s and into the 2000s, movements took place to add additional letters to the acronym to recognize Intersex, Asexual, Aromantic, Agender, and others. As the acronym grew to LGBTIQ, LGBTQIA, LGBTQIAA, many complained this was becoming unwieldy and started using a ‘+’ to show LGBT aren’t the only identities in the community and this became more common, whether as LGBT+ or LGBTQ+. 

bucky being turned into the winter soldier

howard becoming an abusive and neglectful father

natasha being turned into a black widow

people like jfk and mlkjr being murdered

nothing??? for helping any of the civil rights acts??? 

remember jim crow laws and segregation u dunderheads

bruce and hulk getting hurt as a direct relation to trying to replicate the supersoldier serum that is in steve’s body

who could always like,,, donate blood if he trusted the govt an Iota

but he didn’t. and peggy didn’t. and that whole kibitzing the thing was A VERY IMPORTANT CHOICE TO MAKE so the govt needs to get fucked anyway

hydra invading shield/any other position of power

helping literally anyone that was forced into the black widow, wolf spider, or winter soldier programs

leaving his own fucking self in the ice???? for some reason?????????

howard being murdered

also leaving tony alone after the fact???

not warning anyone about thanos

not helping build any kind of defense against thanos or similar threats when he would’ve had literal decades to do it

peggy had already moved on from steve, even after acknowledging she would still love him the rest of her life

not doing anything against the korean war. or the vietnam war. or the-

not talking to carol in any sense whatsoever when she could have helped with most if not all the space threats

knowing previously that peggy would get married and have a long and fulfilling life with the family she chose to become part of

a husband who canonically doesn’t even get a name or a photo that we see, but that still doesn’t ultimately matter because he KNOWS SHE WAS HAPPY

bucky being tortured for decades and having his life taken from him to use to take the lives of others

the same man that is the focal point of steve’s motivation in all their other stories

the same man that steve picked up the shield for, and then dropped the shield for

steve is against bullies, whoever they are

did he honestly even touch shield??? at all?????

hey what about wakanda and people trying to/succeeding in stealing their vibranium, their tech, their weapons

honestly all those people who got hurt or killed in experiments in shield, with SI, or regarding hank pym’s work, like ava starr and her parents

and this isn’t even counting much on a global scale of events THIS IS JUST BASIC MCU HISTORY

russos did you even think about what exactly you erased? did you consider, for a second, what you were doing to the established character of steve? how badly you twisted him out of shape? stomped on his morals, broke his past choices like they were nothing, warped everything that had been built before that moment? 

steve found a family. he found a home. he fought for that home and that family. and you decided that none of that was important enough to stay for when the opportunity arose to see peggy and try a life with her. as if he wasn’t a changed man from the last time she saw him, as if being tired and hurting and frustrated would actually be enough to get him to stop trying to do the right thing and to be a good man.

What scene is this from?

“I missed you too.”