On Bruce Davidson and Eugene Smith
My notes on Bruce Davidson from Everybody Street read: “Bruce Davidson -- empathetic, sweet guy, metro.” Indeed, his interview is deeply endearing to me. He says, “It’s [the ability to connect with his subjects] is about trying to be a human being,” and later remarks that his camera was his buddy as a young boy. I love this very soft, good-natured, empathetic side to Davidson and appreciate that he dedicated so much of his career to documenting the civil rights movement. We are lucky to have such a gentle photographer imparting such a wonderful sense of sentimentality and human connection to his work.Â
Bruce Davidson. Couple Kissing on Street, London, England, 1960.
I’m not as familiar with Eugene Smith but I thoroughly enjoyed his interview. He is extremely well-spoken; this quote from him stood out to me: “Here, let me just touch upon this: photography is still young, it is not yet far enough away from its beginning. I believe that photographers-and this is not the full carcass-are intimidated by the very ease of photography, as well as by its difficulties. By its difficulties, until they have the feeling that, well, since there are so many things almost impossible to overcome, let's just sidle around them, daring nothing, and go ahead anyway, along the accepted paths-some of the biggest names do-and let us rely on its other nature, that quality of easiness.” Unsurprisingly, he shows himself to be someone who reflected often and deeply about the implications and nature of photography.Â
Eugene Smith, The entrance to a section of the Chisso Chemical Plant. Minamata, Japan. 1972
I like this image for the depth, and the fact that he uses the fence to demonstrate how he as a viewer was separated from the chemical plant, and by extension, how the chemical plant is blocked from access and from view with the fence.Â
1. What does hard work mean to a photographer? We have discussed several reputable and successful photographers who have alluded to “what it takes” to be a good photographer -- what does this mean to you?Â
2. Let’s think more concretely about composition. What are Davidson and Smith doing with composition in the two images above, and why did they choose these compositions in particular?Â