Spreading lies as usual huh
Don't act like some of us in Jamblr haven't seen your instagram stories, using screenshots of when Andrew was a MINOR to excuse the fact you still vouch and defend a pedo-zoo friend of yours which tbfh we all know who it is. I do not want them to interact in fandom spaces with children such as the olympics mascot and project hail mary fandoms which are full of minors.
They've drawn nsfw pieces of characters belonging to these fandoms, most notably that one leopard they love so much that they've physically harassed their creator.
You're missing so much of the story, Fuzzyjusttoomuch. You don't know the things this person used to commission less than 3 years ago on a furry site. You don't know how much this person has caused harm to our community and we do not think they should be granted a safe-space online as time and time again they've proven they cannot and will not change.
This person is a genuine danger, I do not know if you are aware that they still currently hide their age, I don't want to know why or for what but they could be genuinely lying to you.
Most of us don't fall into the "they got groomed and that's why they're like that" story as I mentioned before, they won't change and in the worst of cases? They could be harming people by faking their age and rebranding themselves literally every week.
Just a heads up. Stop lying and defending pedo-zoos.
Hi anon :) nice to see you again, if you've been the same one from Jamblr that's popped in my inbox before (and also called me a zoophile in a different inbox with zero evidence to back that claim up.) I am well aware I am being watched by Jamblr (and probably have been for a while now), and I do not care. You guys can watch all you want brauh, lol.
"Spreading lies as usual huh"
What lie am I spreading, exactly? Are you referring to Boot's alternate Bsky account (actively uses the same ocs from his Bootleggreely FA, also the same art style haha) where he's dating an active dinosaur feral porn artist? I'll give him props for one thing- kudos for him for finally figuring out how to separate his presence in online spaces. Unfortunately, he's actively interacting with people and pornographic artwork he claims to be against.
"using screenshots of when Andrew was a MINOR to excuse the fact you still vouch and defend a pedo-zoo friend of yours which tbfh we all know who it is."
Yes, Boot was 16-17 years old around that time period, from my knowledge. However, it is a testament to how quick he is to throw around allegations on other individuals. He started labeling a 13 year old as a Pedophile (starting off with "pedophilic tendencies") due to the fact that they were a minor who shipped themselves with Sir Gilbert. The oc itself was an adult. Same belief was with NSFW drawn of Peck and Cosmo being "pedophilic" because of the idea that they were "minor-coded." If he had truly changed from this time period, he would not have been so quick to insinuate to the Jamblr server that I was 22-23 years old and groomed one of my closest friends into blocking him. He was outright lying about that, considering he did not know my age, and did not even think to consider that I was 14 at the time he, 18-19, was trying to talk to my friend who was 15 at the time, and got blocked by her. So because of this, along with his current sentiment toward his ex friend, I thought the screenshots would show that "yeah wow nothing has actually changed."
..Also, for reference. I'm not that old lol.
"They've drawn nsfw pieces of characters belonging to these fandoms, most notably that one leopard they love so much that they've physically harassed their creator."
The nsfw stuff still reigns true, they are active on their nsfw account in other fandoms. However, none of these fandoms are relevant to Animal Jam, and they do actively block people they suspect to be minors trying to interact with their profile.
I am aware that in the Animal Jam spaces they used to frequent, they would annoy everyone by posting nsfw outside the designated tags, or just annoy people with it "for the funny." It is not something I condone ofc but once again.. that was stuff they did as a minor and I'm not holding them to it as long as it doesn't happen again.
"most notably that one leopard they love so much that they've physically harassed their creator."
If you are referring to Namu, the creator is completely fine with the nsfw of his character, and has even positively interacted with the drawings. And no..? He has not been harassed in any way, shape or form. That is just an outright lie. He has invited them out personally and played with the plush toys they had brought.
"You're missing so much of the story, Fuzzyjusttoomuch. You don't know the things this person used to commission less than 3 years ago on a furry site. You don't know how much this person has caused harm to our community and we do not think they should be granted a safe-space online as time and time again they've proven they cannot and will not change."
I am absolutely willing to hear yall out if you can provide me the evidence that they are still causing problems. However, I think starting probably 2021?, they have long stopped engaging with the art that various community pedophiles and zoophiles had groomed them into when they were 13-16 years old. Obviously, the shit engaged with is despicable, but I am not going to hold an actual victim- who has recieved therapy and extra help to overcome the damage done to them, and work to correct their overall behavior- unless there is a valid reason to do so.
"This person is a genuine danger, I do not know if you are aware that they still currently hide their age, I don't want to know why or for what but they could be genuinely lying to you."
They.. aren't hiding their age though? They are currently 21 years old and showed me their ID. From my understanding, the only times they have faked their age in the past was to pretend to be an adult to get into nsfw spaces (alongside one of their ex friends).. which is once again something I do not agree with, I do not condone, and I think was a highly irresponsible choice. As far as I am aware, they only interact with other adults on their nsfw accounts and will block if they find out a minor is interacting with their content.
"Most of us don't fall into the "they got groomed and that's why they're like that" story as I mentioned before, they won't change and in the worst of cases? They could be harming people by faking their age and rebranding themselves literally every week."
The "they got groomed and that's why they're like that" all falls into the context of the situation. There are ABSOLUTELY victims out there who have repeated the cycle of abuse themselves- for example, Eny/Lurid brainrot. Former AJ community member who was groomed and they became an adult to groom children in the OSC. In cases like that, there's zero excuse because they have grown old enough to understand that behavior is wrong, and continue to do so anyway. People like that should still be held accountable, whether they were victims themselves or not.
However, there ARE various other cases of minors getting groomed into horrendous stuff, and then once they realized that they have been taken advantage of, they distance themselves from the stuff they have previously been pressured into engaging with, and try to heal and move on.
I have helped intervene in a situation with a close irl friend's younger sister, 14-15, who was groomed by various "Age regessing" pedophiles into ABDL diaper stuff. I have friends who have been groomed by adults in the AJ community when they were minors, some even by the same adults who tried to groom me (also a minor at this time). I cut those adults off as soon as I not only realized they they were also trying to rope me in, but there was valid evidence to back up the victims' claims. I have dealt with real life pedophiles who were grooming some of my irl friends.. once again.. all while I was a minor myself, too.
Grooming is an extremely complex situation, and the victims rarely act perfectly. It takes a while for a victim to come to terms with the fact someone they trusted and looked up to was taking advantage and manipulating them the entire time. It is rather stupid to label a person a zoophile or pedophile for the shit they said and drawn as a minor actively getting manipulated by the adults they trusted, especially after they have recieved the help and support they needed and have moved on. Doing that to recovering victims brings down others.
(Once again, I do agree It IS valid to label them as such IF they continue to part in those activities well into adulthood, ESPECIALLY after they have already had the chance to correct past behaviors.)
"and rebranding themselves literally every week."
the individual you are referring to has even addressed their past actions, and apologized for it on their main account. They also have gone through like one rebrand from the time I first met them. I have only seen like two major online aliases for them at most.
"Just a heads up. Stop lying and defending pedo-zoos."
They are not a pedophile nor a zoophile.
You are doing this in defense of someone who tried to engage with a 17 year old (as an adult) over "how hot Greely from Animal Jam" is, and CONTINUES to engage with feral porn artists in spaces that are STILL in the public viewing. If you are the same anon from before, you are also the one who has helped try to spread the idea around that I am a zoophile, I believe you may have been the one to have lied about the PHM "Ryan Gosling alien feral porn," and have outright lied about this individual "faking their age to groom more kids."
Oh yeah, and if I remember correctly, I suspect it may have also been you still trying to spread the notion of "revenge porn" despite the fact that it has not ONLY been me who has come across Boot's VERY. PUBLIC. AND. ACCESSIBLE. DIGITAL. FOOTPRINT, but various community members on the Instagram side of things HAD INDEED FOUND HIS WORK by looking up his Jambassador username. (And I only got the blame because I was the first to confront him about it before I found the Furarchiver lol.)
That is not revenge porn especially to point out how predatory it comes across, and how disgusting it is of a company to help enable such actions, which have indeed caused harm.
You are projecting onto me. Until you can find me evidence of my friend still actively engaging with stuff they have claimed to move on from, or god forbid anything significantly worse, I will hold my current stance because I think all victims deserve a chance to move on from their situations as long as they learn, grow and do not perpetuate the cycle of abuse.
And for further clarification, I absolutely do not condone any of their past actions, and I think some of the criticisms that I have seen from that time period are indeed valid. It is 100% okay to dislike somebody, but it is not okay to lie about and continue to harass somebody who has not been active in your community for about a few years now. Also not okay to direct that toward the surrounding individuals because you cannot access them directly anymore.
If you have a claim, you better be damn ready to show something for it lol.
origamiaround
theartofmadeline
snowghoul
discoholicmusic
areudirty
