Producers: David Oyelowo; Carla Gardini; Shivani Rawat; Monica Levinson
Notable Cast: David Oyelowo; Rosario Dawson; Lonnie Chavis; Amiah Miller
Restrictions: PG for language and horror
The Water Man. Where to even begin with this beautiful gem of a film?Â
The story follows eleven-year old Gunner Boone (Lonnie Chavis) a he navigates the new emotional storm he finds himself in following the move to a new town on top of his motherâs leukemia diagnosis. Spurred on by his imaginative mind and his bottomless wells of hope, Gunner becomes intrigued with the story of the Water Man, a seemingly immortal man who can bring those lost back from the dead. Along the way he teams up with headstrong Jo Riley (Amiah Miller) and learns the meaning of family bonds, love and death.
As the story is so emotional, it relies heavily on colour, frame composition and camera angles to help tell more to the story than what is just expressed through dialogue or action. The four main characters - Gunner, Jo, Amos Boone (David Oyelowo) and Mary Boone (Rosario Dawson) - express emotion and steps in lifeâs journey just as much as they are their own characters. To add to the brilliance of the multiple narrative techniques, this story is first and foremost a family film. The main characters are preteens and act as such. But this doesnât mean the film shies away from its big topics. Instead it handles them with compassion in a way that is understandable to the younger target audience, but also recognises their intelligence and speaks on their level, through characters they can relate to or desire to imprint on.Â
Right away, the most obvious thing about this movieâs storytelling is its use of colour, focusing primarily on yellow, blue and, to an extent, red.Â
Yellow is in almost every scene, and the audience does not see Gunner without the colour yellow being somewhere in the frame. From his bedroom walls to his favourite jacket and even the graffiti which he chooses to leave his scooter parked against, yellow is everywhere in Gunnerâs world. This could be read as his joy and wide-eyed innocence to the world. Heâs a child and no hardship has befallen him yet. Once he discovers and understands the extent of his motherâs illness, however, he still maintains this yellow. Here it could be symbolic of hope - a theme that becomes prevalent through the movie - and a way for Gunner to hold on to those feelings of joy he associates strongly with his mother and his family. Yellow to him represents how he sees his family. Theyâre alive, theyâre warm and theyâre joyous. Later, the stone the Water Man uses to revive the dead is, in Gunnerâs imagination, yellow, Here again the colour is shown to be one of hope. His journey throughout the story is spurred on by this beacon of warm yellow.Â
Red is Amosâs colour. Still warm, it is darker than the bright, young optimism of his son. Amos was in the navy and has lived long enough to see the good and bad of humanity. He is also far more aware of the extent of his wifeâs leukemia than his son is, hoping to protect him by maintaining his ignorance of the situation. Red is also a colour of power, something that Amos, as the perceived head of his family, tries to show people he has even if he himself doesnât believe it. This show of power goes so far as him owning a bright red pickup truck, a vehicle which gets him through a literal police road block during the filmâs climax in an effort to save his son.Â
Mary combines both of these. When she is first shown on screen, she is wearing bright patterns in red and yellow. She is the glue that connects the family together so that Amos has something to protect and Gunner has something to find joy in. At the start of the movie, Gunner and Amosâs relationship is terse, due to Amosâs absence while being stationed in the navy in Japan. They cannot connect to each other and it is up to Mary to be the connection for them. But as Mary gets more sick her clothes loose their bright, bold statements and as they do, Amos and Gunner become closer. Amos learns to connect to his emotions and show his son love. Gunner learns that he can rely on his father and he doesnât need to put the weight of his motherâs illness on his shoulders.
Finally there is the blue, brought through the film through cynical Jo. Blue is far colder than yellow or red and Jo, too, doesnât believe she needs anyone to look out for her. She also wears red initially to show power where she doesnât have any, much like Amos. But as the film progresses all her red falls away and only the blue remains. While her and Gunner are in the forest alone, moving further from their homes, Jo lets herself feel more and more vulnerable, showing off her soft, true, blue side and not her fiery red facade. Her blue coding shows how isolated she is and how desperate she feels she needs to be loved by someone. Gunner in his bright innocence shows her she doesnât have to be cold and aloof to protect herself. In a final scene she is sitting at the dinner table with Gunner and his parents, wearing a yellow shirt. She may be older than Gunner, but he teaches her lessons in kindness, openness and community.
The camera, too, is a voice just as strong as the voice of colour. The shots pay close attention to the dominant emotions of the characters in their situations and act accordingly.Â
When his parents find out that the graphic novel Gunner is writing centres itself around death, they move to a sheltered corridor to talk about it. The whole scene is filmed behind Gunnerâs partially-open door. The audience is made aware of how private the moment is and the isolation of Gunner from the situation. When Mary is too sick to get out of bed and a home nurse staff comes to install medical machines to monitor her vitals, it all happens in the cut-off view Gunner has of it all through the door as he stands in the corridor. He does not understand his motherâs disease and his parents wonât help him to understand. The only way he knows anything about leukemia is through books he borrows from his favourite town bookstore - the same way he stumbles upon the ârealityâ of the Water Man.Â
The camera is also the voice that reminds the audience how small Gunner is when he and Jo embark on their journey to find the elusive Water Man and find a permanent cure for Mary. Every introductory shot of them is far away, leaving them as two tiny yellow and blue specks in the vast, overwhelming landscape. It solidifies how out of their depth the children are, even if their young bravery wonât let them see that. The opening shot of the film is an aerial view of Gunner riding a scooter through a cemetery. Death is all around him, and he feels so small in the face of it.Â
When something confusing happens in the story or there is a cause for Gunner to be disoriented, the camera tracks a circle around him. When he and Jo come across a patch of falling âsnowâ (actually ash from a current forest fire), Gunner and the camera dance around in it as upbeat music plays under him. He doesnât know why there is snow, but his hopeful, yellow personality tells him it must be good. But when he hears strange noises in the forest at night and goes to investigate, the camera here too circles him. But now it is not a sign of wonder in the face of the unknown, but rather an isolating confusion. Gunner takes centre frame as a light against pitch black. Fear disorients him and his hope and all of this is told through the track of a camera.Â
The Water Man ends up being nothing but a ghost story that Gunner in his innocent hope wants to believe. But that doesnât mean that the film is void of any lessons, especially lessons important for any child to come to terms with.
I couldât help but notice the Boone family being the only three black people in the whole town of Pine Mills. This, the fact that they only recently moved in and Mary being sick should make them the most âotheredâ members of the tiny community. Amos drives through the town and the movie pointedly stops to look at the older, white residents and Amosâs uncertainty over it. But apart from that this âotheringâ is little discussed. The movie is through Gunnerâs perspective and it seems that he has been taught how to be more friendly, polite and well-spoken than most of the adults to overcome this. People are drawn to Gunner and everyone - even the sheriff who only knows him from his missing poster - warms up to him. Even though the story is told through him, he seems like an attainable goal. His character is presented as the good one. The peace-loving, book-reading, well dressed, open young boy. He leaves without his parentsâ permission to a place they donât know, but texts his mom to save her from worrying. He doesnât retaliate when Jo lashes out at him. He is friendly to the owner of the bookstore. He is ready to listen to the townâs designated âcrazy scientistâ (who is played by Alfred Molina, which I find amusing) with a sympathetic ear and a curious mind. His character prioritises love over any show of masculine strength. And this character embodied by a young, black boy is a message that needs to be heard loud and clear across the board.Â
On the other hand, Jo is the cynical opposite and the other character children watching this movie would relate to. She is the âcool girlâ with blue hair, strong eyeliner and mystic tales of her brush with death at the hands of the Water Man. But this is quickly shown as a negative character through the responses of Gunner. Though calm and gentle, he condemns Joâs thievery, her aggression and her need to be flawless in everything. Instead of taking a joke, she retreats in to herself. She acts brave, but, unlike Gunner, she is running away from and not towards something. Her character would rather escape than face her issues - those issues bing the very real problem of an abusive, negligent father. Gunner is the first person to show her genuine love and at first it scares her. She pushes him away when she feels her guard coming down. But what starts in a bright red tent as a way for her to lord power over a younger boy, grows into a genuine friendship by the end of it. At every day in their journey they get closer. From sleeping at different times to sleeping on opposite sides of a literal line in the sand to a final hug as Gunner saves Jo from the flames, her redemption shows that, while your past is a part of you, it need not define your character.
Another massive part of the story is the complicated relationship between father and son. Mary and Gunner get on together easily and have a natural read on each other. But between Gunner and Amos, things are more strained. Amos doesnât know how to talk to Gunner at the start of the film. He tries to play football with his sensitive, creative son, destroying his graphic novel in the process. He canât handle any difficult conversations with Gunner, especially not those which discuss Mary and her illness.Â
But it is Amos who leaves everything to look for and save his son once he goes missing. It is Amos who Gunner trusts enough to let him be carried across a lake - his greatest fear is water. It is also Amos at the end of the film that buys Gunner new art supplies and encourages him to work through his creative block. After they come home, Gunner is dressed in a red shirt, a colour related to Amos, and Amos is in yellow. Amos, too, confronts Gunner about death, specifically Maryâs. They all know what will happen, and while Mary laughs it off, saying after death sheâll go to âThe Cheesecake Factoryâ, Amos sympathises with Gunner. He admits he hates the idea of losing Mary and it is this act of vulnerability that eventually leads to Gunner and Amos sharing their first hug.
The Water Man handles the topics of life, death, love and sickness with amazing poise for a film targeted at such a young demographic. But this limited age does mean that some parts added to the film undermine its message.Â
There are a few moments with too much whimsey. Yes, Gunner is creative and when this is expressed through his drawings being animated in his sketchbook, or an animation of the history of the Water Man, it works. But when it is used to create a tsunami of bugs washing Jo and Gunner away from their supplies in the middle of the night, it goes a little too far. Gunner imagining his whole encounter with the Water Man himself also feels a little too much like the cliche âand it was all a dreamâ sequence everyone knows and hates.
The subplot of the forest fire also doesnât lead anywhere. There is no real emphasis placed on the opposites of fire and water. Apart from speeding up the events of the film and creating higher stakes for Amos to find his son, it amounts to next to nothing. It felt like filler in a script that was so rich otherwise it didnât need it in the first place.Â
But it still stands as one of the best family films I have seen. Perhaps even one of the most eloquent films I have seen and I believe it deserves a full 8/10 final score.Â