Consent Culture: What it is and isnāt
In some of the hypnokink discord spaces Iām in, Iāve noticed a worrying trend. People saying other folk canāt talk about a specific topic, or use certain words, etc, because they ādidnāt consent to that.ā Itās a weaponization of consent culture to force *purity* culture, often, and Iām really tired of seeing the culture I fought so hard to help establish be used to silence folk just trying to talk about things they enjoy!
So. Letās all have a little chat about what consent culture is and means, what it isnāt, and what any given individualās responsibilities are in a consent culture.
Being in a consent culture means not *doing things* to other people without their consent; touch, sharing information about them, in my communityās context hypnotizing them or using/attempting to use triggers on them⦠things like that. It also includes giving people space where they can feel comfortable disagreeing, saying ānoā to requests, and so on. Respecting other peopleās boundaries, and not always demanding their time and energy. It involves making a good faith effort to respect not only the letter of the rules, but the *spirit* of the rules in a space, as well.
It is not, however, shutting down anything that causes anyone in the space discomfort. Weāre all adults here, as this is a kink space. As adults, we SHOULD be able to handle a little discomfort. And if something is truly upsetting to you? You can ask something like āhey, can we change the topic,ā of course, but if the others donāt want to? Or, if, say, youāre in a public play space and someone is doing a scene you donāt like? Thatās when the rule of two feet comes in.
For those who are unfamiliar with the rule/law of two feet, itās a concept taken from a meeting style called āopen spacesā - and loosely what unconferences are based around.
A businessman named Harrison Owen, involved in spaces that promote this philosophy, sums it up thusly:
āBriefly stated, this law says that every individual has two feet, and must be prepared to use them. Responsibility for a successful outcome in any Open Space Event resides with exactly one personāeach participant. Individuals can make a difference and must make a difference. If that is not true in a given situation, they, and they alone, must take responsibility to use their two feet, and move to a new place where they can make a difference.ā
What does that mean in kink spaces? Well, itās less about productivity/making a difference, and more about finding the right comfort level. Is a class covering topics that you donāt enjoy? Or is the demo a bit more graphic than youād like to see? Step out (whether for a moment or the rest of the class) and get some air, going back in later if you want to see if theyāve moved to something you find more comfortable. People talking about a kink that you find squicky or that triggers negative emotions? Walk away for a bit, or stop reading the channel. On places like here, on tumblr, mute a tag/word. Let people enjoy the thing and rejoin them when the topic changes.
Because thatās your responsibility in a consent culture - advocating for your own comfort *in a way that lets people enjoy the things they enjoy.* Sometimes that means you miss out on time with people you like, yes. But itās better than making people dislike you because you keep telling them that they canāt engage with something they enjoy!
Also? Because it bears calling out, though itās a bit tangential here? Disgust is not and never will be a gauge of immorality or unethical behaviour. Plenty of people are disgusted by the concept of rape play - but that doesnāt mean that consenting adults engaging in rape play are acting unethically. Some things are both disgusting AND unethical, of course - actual rape, for example! - but if your main reason for saying something is immoral or unethical is āit makes me uncomfortableā or āI find it disgustingā? Probe harder and consider that your aversion may just be distaste, and it isnāt a moral judgement.
Bystander consent is a different topic for another day, mostly, but I do want to note - it tends to come into play when the Rule of 2 Feet doesnāt really work, such as in places of business where employees cannot walk away.
I also want to take a moment to discuss the distinction between consent and having boundaries.
Consent is about things being done to or by you; boundaries are about other peopleās actions that are not directly involving you.
So ādonāt pull my hairā is a consent line. āDonāt talk about X around me or Iāll stop interacting with youā is a boundary.
āDonāt talk about X around meā without a consequence is just a rule, and outside of power exchange dynamics where the ability to give rules is negotiated? Rules in relationships typically just breed resentment.Ā But also, if you disagree with a boundary someone is trying to draw for you, and youāre willing to bear the consequences? That *is not* a consent violation. That isnāt what consent is for. Having said that, a violation is a violation - whether a violation of boundaries or of consent - and either can hurt just as much as the other.
And claiming otherwise? Is weaponizing consent culture to manipulate people, whether intentionally or not. And we all need to do better than that.