"well, it's possible"

What is the uncensored version of Духо*бы (Ghostfuckers) ?? It's the Russian title / translation for Helluva Boss' Ghostfuckers episode,, I think Дух is ghost,, so о*бы must be fuckers... but I can't figure out what's supposed to be in place of *.....

I hate censoring... also, asterisks doesn't work with SMB, so I have to use a different title...

Hm,,, I wonder if that means I'm shadow banned?? Eh, probably not, I can still comment. Also I don't give enough of a fuck lmao. But it is inconvient for you I think? So that sucks :( I mean,, it's okay if you don't like every post, or do so as soon as I post,, I personally only go through people's blogs once in a while,, >_<

Making love but it's cooking pierogi (* ´ ﹃｀*) 2gether [pt: together] instead of sex. also ur married.

I wish ghosts were real so I could haunt the narrative, as his dead husband who he's absolutely not and will never be over.

Like the thought of him being all m-middle aged (* ´ ﹃｀*),, depressed,, in pain,,, cold,,, alone,,,,, unloved,,, alcoholic,,, self harming,, etc. etc. a whole decade after my passing is cool. Maybe he also blames himself or something, idk I just think it would be hot if got black out drunk while crying over me and contemplating suicide. also he cuts himself. And maybe like in movies, that kind of scene where like,, his backstory for his constant miserable attitude is elaborated upon, and it's because of me, who tragically died 10 years ago, and he hates the whole world and himself bc of it, that's why he's miserable all the time. Maybe there's also a line like,, 'I miss my husband' before slumping over the bar table (next 2 a bunch of empty glasses).

idk I just think it would be really hot and cool and great jerk off material. yk, his endless devotion to me. also his suffering. I like seeing him in pain, especially bc of me, I'm not sure it does it for me otherwise.

🍀 ┈ gimmie a fun fact about urself ! !

☝️🤓 umm, actually,, facts are a social construct and I don't respect society- jk jk

I,,, don't know how to answer this, because any opinion about myself I believe in would be a fact about myself,, I am the only judge,,, uh,, I like holding hands with my h-husband > _ <

Wait! Here's a good one, that I'm not sure I've mentioned before. But you know how radqueer blogs often get terminated? Well, I have my own Archive Box instance set up, so if my blog ever goes down, well,,, I'll still be able to see my posts anyways.

I also low key self host in general (I use Arch BTW). I have a little Jellyfin server too, as well as Kiwix (offline Wiki, I search up the definitions of words quite often, and using internet is just too slow + it always gives some fuckass company/stocks/etc. as the first result instead of the definition), and Calibre (which I know Jellyfin can do books, and I haven't checked it out yet, but I feel like Calibre is better for managing books in general, since it's dedicated & more specific, but it's whatever. I set up Calibre before Jellyfin so maybe I'm just too lazy to switch).

Also not really the same, but honourable mentions are: Transmission, yt-dlp, webtoon-dl, stream-dl, Sunshine and SSH. I download a lot of stuff in the background, like,,, that's where I get the content for Jellyfin and Kiwix,, plus it's in the background / on a seperate computer, so I use Moonlight and SSH a lot.

Honestly using Arch Linux has changed me (wow that sounds dramatic). I mean everything is bloat to me now. GUI? More like GUWhy. Why use an app when you can just use a command / terminal???? Plus it's easier to interact with that way no? Like idk how you would automate a GUI program. The only time I use GUI is when I'm too s t u p i d [pt: stupid] (* ´ ﹃｀*) or otherwise have no choice. Also desktop envirment? Fucking BLOAT. Just use a window tiling manager. (I use Ambxst btw if anyone cares.)

Normal user: I use my pc with default settings. Advanced user: I customise my settings and remove unneeded apps. Mentally ill Arch linux user: I didn't install a settings app because it's unneeded and frankly bloatware, just edit the config file.

Okay that's it.

(i wonder what my -oomf would be??? somnoomf???)

Yay thank you >_< >_< >_<

and yeah,, somnoomf fits! or maybe schizoomf? I like picking words that end in o >_< well either way, we would match. I also like sleepy sex + am schizo-spec (♡ˊ͈ ꒳ ˋ͈)

'RadLARP' or 'LARP' in general is such a weird fucking insult. Like the problem is that they're bigoted?? Like they're saying they're radical but they're actually not, and they're trying to hurt people and stuff. The problem isn't 'live action roleplaying' or pretending or literally anything else,, none of those things are inherently wrong. The problem is bigotry. Like you didn't need to invent a new word, you already had it, it's called bigot. Also LARPing exists outside of and before this bigotry?? It literally already exists as an acronym for people roleplaying, why are you trying to make it synonymous with bad person???? Ehh,,, this insult low key reminds people who bully others for being nerds, liking cartoons, fanfics, or you know... roleplaying. Like whaaatt is this bro? Like LARP is your insult?????? Not bigot??? How are ya'll not over this 'nerd = loser cringe haha' shit.

When you check the blog of someone you blocked a long time ago, and see they've gotten even more blockable, like,, the WORST takes ever, even worse than what you blocked them for XD Like damn,,,

you do this once a month

I do! It's my new little routine :)

I want to save this post for when I have more braincells, but it's been a while, and I'm starting to think I'm never going to have enough brain cells. Also I got really sick yesterday. So here's my mid take:

I think things can be both, that is, good and bad at the same time. Like,,,, filter evading is wrong, because it's disrespecting the viewers consent,, and I also get why the poster would want to do it in these circumstances, because of how crucial money is to their consent (which sounds weird, but yk, I mean like their desire to continue living).

Morality aside, I'm not sure of the efficiency of censoring. If someone didn't want to see your post, is forcing them to see it anyways going to make them more amendable? I....... don't feel like that's the most likely answer.

For corporation censorship, I remember hearing about how Cashapp would block transactions if they mentioned Palestine in the notes, or something like that, I forgot, but I'm quite confident censorship is a real thing happening even though I don't keep up with it.

I guess... how do I say this, corporations are comprised of people, it could be considered a group of people in a way, however, when it's overarching things like this (I'm also thinking of things like governmental policies), they're not making a personal choice to censor, something that blocks only what they see, they're making a choice for everyone else, including people that disagree, so that's why I see personal censoring as okay while corporate censoring isn't. Meaning,, it's understandable to disrespect that.

Also,, since it might be a bit confusing, disallowing a word (like blocking all instances using 'war') and misspelling a word (like 'w@r') are both acts of censorship, but they're different kinds, like the misspelling censorship can be a reaction to the disallowing type of censorship.

Which,,, yeah,,,, I think it's wrong people are forced to censor, I hold more disagreement for the people forcing this censoring. I also know, when it comes to censoring like calling sexual abuse 'SA' instead (so different from the '$@' type of censoring), this is a society problem, basically everyone is brought up to censor, to avoid talking about 'bad topics', avoid calling them out fully, to feel shame and self blame and low self esteem when things like this happen to them, or feel disgust and aversion when hearing about it in general, to just. not want to talk about it. to just not want to say the word. to just not want to look at the problem fully. That's not to say, people haven't had deep discussions about things like sexual abuse, while calling it SA, but I still see it as a subtle remnant, reinforcement of that sentiment, even if they don't mean it. I think the most insidious things in this world, isn't honest harm, but covert and soft harm, because then people can take it into their mind with less resistance than overt issues, fester terrible ideas,, + excuses like 'I don't mean it like that' that wouldn't be so valid sounding otherwise.

So,,, I feel like I'm saying a lot of nothing.

,,, I disagree with that censoring + would block it on a personal level, and I also disagree with the people forcing them to censor (both in the sense of censoring directly when asking for donations, as well as needing donations at all). I mean,, it's very tragic all around, though I suppose, most probably don't see censorship as a tragedy, like wow, what a world we live in, can't even ask for help honestly.

And I guess I don't have much thoughts about donations, they need money, because of the terrible way the world works, that money is required for survival, so they should get it.

I can't imagine any nuance, unless talking about donors? Which,, I have a broader idea for that. An action can be good, really, the terrible things in the world should be rectified, and inaction can still not be wrong, but again, not good either. It doesn't have to be one of the other, it can just be neutral. I feel like people use the good & bad dichotomy too much, it can just be nothing/neither.

But I guess,,, I don't know,,, I think there can be multiple sets of morals, like personal morals and wider morals... Like,,,, inaction can be / is wrong to the vicim, that's valid, and also I don't think people should be forced to fix everything, idk, I don't like forcing people to do things, even bad ppl, bad circumstances call for bad choices, but I still prefer if everyone had the most consensual outcome. I guess also like,,, just because someone is immoral, doesn't mean you have to go out and slaughter them, right? So it doesn't really matter if you categorise them as immoral or not, do whatever is most helpful to you, they can still have their own lives,, and just live separately.

I think punishment hinders honesty, because instead of just considering whether something is wrong to you or not (or to some other person), you have to contend with their treatment based on your categorisation, so it ends up being a heavier decision, that may end up pushing people to consider something okay, when it really isn't, just because they think torture and stuff is wrong (too). I think that's oppressive and actually promotes moral atrocities (no matter how much people call it justice).

I think this was a great question, and I'm kind of pathetic for not giving a good response, just this lukewarm neutral shit, like,,, it's such an important topic.

Oh well...?

It wasn't my thing but I'm starting to see it,,

Typical affectionate names like 'sweetie' or 'honey',, (* ´ ﹃｀*) it's so marital,,, + conabuse,,, woaw,,,,,, poor little abused husband that calls you sweetie,, hehe,,, or like,, 'relax honey' and it's rape. omg have I mentioned marriage?? me when marital rape. me when marital abuse. me when marriage. me when eternal love and devotion.

I have 2 moods:

Everyone loves me!

Sniffles,, wetly,,,, do you h8 [pt: hate] me? >_< >_< >_<