It's like that University of Chicago essay question: create a trio and explain how and why they fit together. Our trio for today is a makeshift Ebola treatment facility created by Doctors Without Borders, high-quality preschool, and micro-financing for women, suggested from an Op-Ed piece in today's Times by Nicholas Kristof.
"The Ebola Fiasco" points out that had African governments and the international community put a little more muscle and money behind preventing Ebola or containing it at the outset, the CDC wouldn't be predicting there will be 1.4 million cases by late January. Or that the UN estimates that $1 billion will be spent to control the virus.
So how do preschool and microfinancing relate to the Ebola outbreak? Investing in both helps prevent bigger headaches and heartaches later.
High-quality preschool is like an inoculation against poverty; the social skills children learn there (working out disputes, sharing, exercising restraint) resonate into adulthood, resulting in stronger marriages, better jobs and wages, and fewer visits to prison.
When governments or nonprofits provide microfinancing for poor women, their success reaps benefits not only for the women themselves but stabilizes their families and entire communities. Some studies point to a 60 percent reduction in poverty, with fewer missed meals and children spending more time in school
"It was not miraculous but [microfinancing] was working. Microcredit has earned its rightful place as one of the key instruments in the fight against poverty," said economists Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo, who examined microfinance in Hyderabad, India.
The Ebola spidemic has spun out of control. Let's not let the same happen to in educating children and giving women small loans to support their families.













