I am black, unapologetically and phenomenlly. Dynamic Observer. Sagittarian Writer. Reader of Books, Cards, and People who deserve it. DM or email me ([email protected]) for card readings
Today, we're looking visions of freedom with Janelle Monae's music career, X-Men's triumphant and controversial Krakoa era in comics, and the ideology of Solarpunk.
Be sure to give it a watch, like, subscribe, share, and give it a comment.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
β Live Streamingβ Interactive Chatβ Private Showsβ HD Qualityβ Free Actions
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
the thing about mothers in fiction is that a lot of fandoms seem to be under the impression that the worst thing a woman can possibly do is be a bad mother. like they can forgive deadbeat dads easily but the moment a woman is a bad or even mediocre mother she's the devil incarnate to them. and then you're like "i like her and i think she's interesting" and they immediately go "oh so you think it's okay to be a bad mother (which is the most evil thing a woman can be)". and don't even get me started on how they react to female characters who are bad stepmothers
Unironically I think this is why Medea by Euripides is so heavily misinterpreted as a character assassination on its protagonist or a misogynistic smear against women everywhere when the original text itself challenges the idea that Medea is a villain. A lot of modern (and even some ancient) people talking about the play or the character refer to Medea as an archetypal example of a horrible evil crazy mother because they fundamentally misunderstand the premise of the play and itβs because its protagonist isnβt the typical self-sacrificial suffer-in-silence martyr for her kids that people expect mothers to be. Medea is not called to be a doting mother, she is called to be an instrument of divine punishment for Jasonβs crimes against her and her children and she fulfils the role that better suits her.
The play makes it clear that Medea loves her kids, that she wanted to see them grow up to be heroes and achieve greatness before Jason robbed their sons of that future with his abandonment. Everything she does is in response to the horrific circumstances JASON put them in. Jason expects Medea to capitulate because heβs holding their children over her head and a βtypicalβ mother is supposed to drop everything for her children. But a trapped fox gnaws its leg off, and a starving sow eats her young, and Medea is explicitly not a typical Greek woman, she is the blood of gods and an instrument of their justice and she tells us who she is in her own monologue: Her identity aligns with and is every bit as inclined to greatness and savagery as the lauded, blood-soaked male heroes of epic tradition. And when she is forced to prove it, she does.
And she is implicitly justified by the narrative. She occupies a role in Greek tragedies traditionally reserved for the gods, and their conspicuous lack of intercession implies that their judgement is already being carried out by the semi-divine Medea.
The whole play is a reflection on the roles women are forced into and how thankless and dangerous it is to be at the mercy of men. Medea did everything right by her husband and was thrown to the wolves, if she had played the part of a βgoodβ mother she and her sons would have suffered. It was Jasonβs failure to fulfil the role of a good Greek man who takes care of his family that forces Medea to abandon the role of a good Greek woman if she wants to survive. But people miss this point because they canβt absorb Medea with any nuance past her choosing herself over her children, and so the whole work is reduced to βman isnβt it scary when women go crazy? So evil!!β
Like Medea not being punished by the gods for filicide is such a crucial part of the narrative both in the play and the myth in general.
Medea doesn't get punished by the gods. She gets assistance via a chariot pulled by dragons which adds to how she transforms.
And taking it a step further, I like to explore the idea that Medea didn't actually murder her children.
That's just the version recounted by Jason and accepted by the status quo around him.
Instead, his sons choose to be with Medea over him. They choose to embody the qualities of their mother as opposed to their father which would hurt more in a society that positions patralineal connections as valuable.
See now I donβt know about that last part. I feel like it softens Medea too much while also misunderstanding key points about the context of her decision. And my point was why is there a need to soften her? The premise of my argument is that her actions are shocking (and make no mistake, they are) not just because of the actions themselves, but because she is a woman and mother rather than a father.
Heracles and Agamemnon also kill their kids for various reasons, willingly or not. Achilles is also ruled by rage and vengeance. Odysseus also commits infanticide and lies and tricks people into destroying themselves. Why are these complicated men celebrated as heroes but Medea is an evil witch?
And this is a concept alluded to in the original text. Euripides specifically uses/inverts Homeric imagery throughout the play, Medeaβs speeches about pride and honor and how hers have been violated ring verrrry Homeric as well. Medea explicitly laments in her first appearance on stage that she was not born a man who could go through battle instead of childbirth. I think her rage is even explicitly likened to Achillesβ at one point but I donβt have my book on me to find the citation. And when she kills her kids, she doesnβt do it in the usual way she takes care of her enemies with poison (a βwomanlyβ mode of violence) she kills them w a bronze sword, AKA the very masculine weapon of heroes.
But aside from that, itβs also very important to the narrative that Medea and Jasonβs kids have to die. Itβs never a matter of their sonβs choice bc they are both too young. Medea is forced to choose between leaving them with Jason (a man who has heartily demonstrated his selfishness and disregard for them) in Corinth where they will almost certainly be in danger from the royal family (a fear of hers that is heavily implied to be justified. Frankly all of her fears and predictions are justified), or they can come with her and live the life of fatherless and homeless exiles w barbarian ancestry in Greece, which is another horrible and painful option.
Her only escape route is that sheβs suckered kindly old King Aegeus of Athens into saying heβll provide shelter for her no questions asked. But even this is not a terribly secure option despite the oaths she made him swear. Medea (and her sons by association) is still a foreigner, still fatherless, and still not in her own homeland which is a very dangerous and insecure position for a person in Ancient Greece. And we the audience know she was right not to take her sons there with her bc she gets chased out of Athens and is homeless again when Aegeusβ son Theseus grows up.
Medea has just spent the whole play lamenting about how much pain and insecurity she is experiencing as a result of being a barbarian (aka foreigner) in Greece who does not have the luxury of family to help her or provide shelter for her. And Jasonβs only family wouldnβt help them either bc theyβve burned that bridge pretty thoroughly already, thatβs why they were living in Corinth in the first place. Medea explicitly says that she will not let her kids suffer, and that life would certainly be full of it.
But Medea doesnβt just make this decision for her kids wellbeing, her main reasoning is that Jason needs to be punished and that will not be complete without destroying his only children. And make no mistake, Jason needs to be punished, because his crimes arenβt just against Medea. He has broken sacred oaths and disrespected several gods.
Jason while arguing with Medea claims that he doesnβt have to be grateful to her or anyone else for helping him, except maybe Cypris (AKA Aphrodite) for making Medea fall in love with him and therefore do all the things she did to repeatedly save him. Which isβ¦ blatantly untrue. Jason is helped by several mortals and more importantly several GODS on his journeys, who areβ¦ shall we sayβ¦ famously uncool about going unthanked and famously VERY cool with killing blasphemers kids as punishment.
And there is no god he has betrayed more egregiously than Hera, his own patron goddess who was with him from day one. The goddess of marriage, who presided over his own marriage, a marriage he has just betrayed. A goddess that Medea doesnβt fall out of favor with, because when she buries her children she chooses a sanctuary sacred to Hera, where she knows her childrenβs graves will be protected from desecration by her enemies.
When Medea kills their kids much of her reasoning is that theyβll be in danger from her own enemies and that if someoneβs going to kill her kids it should be her, who loves them and gave them life. But their father has plenty of enemies too, and the gods conspicuous absence implies their work is already being done by Medea, which is confirmed when she appears on the mechane at the end of the play, a staging choice in Greek tragedy that is reserved for gods.
Jasonβs kids always had to die because of what Jason did. Heβs obsessed with his legacy and reputation, itβs what he betrayed Medea for in the first place because he wanted a more prestigious marriage. As long as his kids live, he still has one and therefore his punishment isnβt complete. And it is at the end. Jason is completely alone, with no wife, no children, no status, no kingdom of his own. Medea flies away in a golden chariot gifted to her by her divine grandfather while Jason cries out into the silence for the gods and gets nothing. He dies years later, alone and in anonymity, by a fragment of his old ships mast falling on his head. Itβs literally the worst fate possible for a Greek hero.
The tragedy (because this is, after all, a tragedy) isnβt what happens to Jason, his is a punishment for pride, blasphemy and oathbreaking. The emotional core of the play centers around Medeaβs loss, and her agony over what she has to do. If the kids donβt die then youβve taken the tragedy out of the tragedy.
TLDR: There is a tendency to soften Greek heroes (and I do consider Medea a hero in the Homeric sense) for modern retellings to make them easier for a modern audience to swallow, The Song of Achilles (though I love it) is very guilty of this and so is Nolanβs Odyssey, and it usually comes at the expense of all the nuance and greyness that made them so interesting that weβre still obsessed with them thousands of years later. If you take away the bloodshed and the cruelty and the rage you are taking away the pathos and stakes of the narrative, as well as the historical and cultural context.
Euripides using Medea's story and status as a foreign individual makes her a perfect vehicle for questioning and dissecting the treatment of women.
My intent for exploring the alternate scenario that she doesn't actually or physically kill her sons isn't because it makes her soft in my mind.
It's because the wound that Jason suffers is that he is without legacy and he faces another example of rejection that led him to start his heroic journey with the Argonauts.
While Medea seems to transcend the struggles that women would typically face and the social constraints that they are bound by.
If she were a regular woman in the Greek context, then it makes sense that she would think about everything you mentioned.
But the ending of her story where she flies off gives me the vibe that she's moved beyond the station of a regular woman. And if she takes her sons in this alternate ending, then they also transcend in a way.
Now to your point, her killing her sons also can hold the same reading of transcending a station. She's enacting a form of motherhood that is far from soft. She's embodying a violence that only men are encouraged or allowed to exercise. She is a complex heroine.
I would admit my love of Medea comes from her complexity, and the theme of her foreign identity sticks out to me (person born in the 1990s U.S.A.) and makes me think of how people deemed foreign are often depicted/portrayed in a negative light or literally demonized while also exploited at times.
And unfortunately, I think that stereotype plagues people's reading of Medea as well. The exotic mystical manic woman.
I connect that idea with Dido's depiction in the Aeneid where there's this parallel between her and Aeneas, but she's the one who's overcome with divine passion that makes her immolate herself and abandon her people.
the thing about mothers in fiction is that a lot of fandoms seem to be under the impression that the worst thing a woman can possibly do is be a bad mother. like they can forgive deadbeat dads easily but the moment a woman is a bad or even mediocre mother she's the devil incarnate to them. and then you're like "i like her and i think she's interesting" and they immediately go "oh so you think it's okay to be a bad mother (which is the most evil thing a woman can be)". and don't even get me started on how they react to female characters who are bad stepmothers
Unironically I think this is why Medea by Euripides is so heavily misinterpreted as a character assassination on its protagonist or a misogynistic smear against women everywhere when the original text itself challenges the idea that Medea is a villain. A lot of modern (and even some ancient) people talking about the play or the character refer to Medea as an archetypal example of a horrible evil crazy mother because they fundamentally misunderstand the premise of the play and itβs because its protagonist isnβt the typical self-sacrificial suffer-in-silence martyr for her kids that people expect mothers to be. Medea is not called to be a doting mother, she is called to be an instrument of divine punishment for Jasonβs crimes against her and her children and she fulfils the role that better suits her.
The play makes it clear that Medea loves her kids, that she wanted to see them grow up to be heroes and achieve greatness before Jason robbed their sons of that future with his abandonment. Everything she does is in response to the horrific circumstances JASON put them in. Jason expects Medea to capitulate because heβs holding their children over her head and a βtypicalβ mother is supposed to drop everything for her children. But a trapped fox gnaws its leg off, and a starving sow eats her young, and Medea is explicitly not a typical Greek woman, she is the blood of gods and an instrument of their justice and she tells us who she is in her own monologue: Her identity aligns with and is every bit as inclined to greatness and savagery as the lauded, blood-soaked male heroes of epic tradition. And when she is forced to prove it, she does.
And she is implicitly justified by the narrative. She occupies a role in Greek tragedies traditionally reserved for the gods, and their conspicuous lack of intercession implies that their judgement is already being carried out by the semi-divine Medea.
The whole play is a reflection on the roles women are forced into and how thankless and dangerous it is to be at the mercy of men. Medea did everything right by her husband and was thrown to the wolves, if she had played the part of a βgoodβ mother she and her sons would have suffered. It was Jasonβs failure to fulfil the role of a good Greek man who takes care of his family that forces Medea to abandon the role of a good Greek woman if she wants to survive. But people miss this point because they canβt absorb Medea with any nuance past her choosing herself over her children, and so the whole work is reduced to βman isnβt it scary when women go crazy? So evil!!β
Like Medea not being punished by the gods for filicide is such a crucial part of the narrative both in the play and the myth in general.
Medea doesn't get punished by the gods. She gets assistance via a chariot pulled by dragons which adds to how she transforms.
And taking it a step further, I like to explore the idea that Medea didn't actually murder her children.
That's just the version recounted by Jason and accepted by the status quo around him.
Instead, his sons choose to be with Medea over him. They choose to embody the qualities of their mother as opposed to their father which would hurt more in a society that positions patralineal connections as valuable.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
β Live Streamingβ Interactive Chatβ Private Showsβ HD Qualityβ Free Actions
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
β Live Streamingβ Interactive Chatβ Private Showsβ HD Qualityβ Free Actions
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
β Live Streamingβ Interactive Chatβ Private Showsβ HD Qualityβ Free Actions
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming