i looked up a couple recommended translations, and i think i would suggest this one by julie rose or this one by catherine liu! i read a bit of liu's and i found it good, i think it's faithful enough to hugo's voice. i havent been able to read through rose's because it's very recent (came out this year!), but the fact that it has the correct title makes me biased towards it (+ i read a bit of her misérables translation, and i like it). victor hugo was never happy with the translation "hunchback of notre-dame", and im with him on this. the closest this book has to a human main character is frollo, and even then, not really! the original title is an important part of the philosophy of the book. a cathedral is as anonymous as a project can be : the people who started building notre-dame never saw it finished. she stood there through centuries of deaths, executions, massacres. from her towers, you can look at all of paris in one glance, and see all the streets and houses and people as one, you lose sight of details. and that's how this book is written, with the detachment of someone who has seen this before, who is looking at these characters from a high tower, who thinks they have very little lives whose details will be forgotten, and are already dead. when victor hugo is mad at the justice system here, it's with cold irony, not with the humanist compassion he has for jean valjean. the characters exist to tell a story about notre-dame, and aren't really people, they're more symbols. esmeralda of purity and innocence, frollo of repressed humanity twisting love to hate, quaismodo of obedience, phoebus of selfish hedonism, gringoire of victor hugo. that's not to say that they're badly written, they're written beautifully and serve their purpose well, but giving quasimodo the title is absolutely wrong. notre-dame can be a tough read cause of the ugliness driving a lot of the book (all these grown men obsessing over a teenage girl, and the constant fetishization/hatred of her being roma ; frollo's evilness is so incredibly chilling and disturbing, it's so vivid), i still recommend it for being such a singular and powerful book. it really feels like if a novel was an incomprehensibly massive, ancient cathedral, i've never read anything else like it