Ninian Smart (a religious studies scholar) uses a method, called Dialectical Phenomenology, that incorporates different worldviews in order to gain a bigger picture of the intersectionality of traditions, regions, and cultures. He defines nine dimensions within dialectical phenomenology: ritual or practical, doctrinal or philosophical, mythic or narrative, experiential or emotional, ethical or legal, organizational or social, and material or artistic. I will use Smart’s framework in my posts.
Smart states that the seven dimensions “are not set in concrete” and that “other ways of looking at worldviews are possible.” The ritual and emotional dimensions intersect due to the practices connecting the two in the experience of meditation. So, while the seven dimensions help study Sufism, religion is still complex and overlapping. Smart sees that worldviews are “where values and beliefs are embedded in practice. That is, they are expressed in action, law, symbols, organizations.” Most of the dimensions were rooted in other dimensions, which makes the analysis a bit repetitive. Traditions are always evolving. And, Smart’s dialogical phenomenology does a great job of creating a better picture of Sufism with the information know.
Photo Credit
Source: Smart, Ninian. Dimensions of the Sacred: An Anatomy of the World’s Beliefs. Fontana, 1997.











