Design Patent Lookbook

Issued this week to Pikolinos Diseño S.L.U.,—D1,003,011, for a design for a “shoe.”

Issued this week—D1,002,148, for a design for a “square-necked long-sleeved shirt.”

Issued this week to Rothy’s—D1,002,177, for a design for a “tote bag.”

Issued this week to Balenciaga—D1,002,162, for a design for a “shoe.”

Issued this week to Bottega Veneta S.R.L.— D1,002,157, for a design for a “boot.”

Issued this week—D1,001,488, for a design for a “sandal handle.”

Issued this week to AZZEDINE ALAIA SAS—D1,001,433, for a design for a “shoe.”

Issued this week—Dl,001,424 , for a design for a “shirt.”

Issued this week—D997,494, for a design for a “skirt.”

Does this pool float infringe this design patent? That's one of the issues in this recently-filed case.

D92,701 - issued in 1934 for a design for a "cellophane hat or analogous article."

Issued this week—D993,574, for a design for a “swimsuit.”

Issued this week to New Balance Athletics, Inc.—D992,243, for a design for “footwear.”

Issued this week—D992,263, for a design for a “shoe.”

Issued this week to Bulgari S.p.A.—D992,276, for a design for a “bag.”

Issued this week to Pikolinos Diseño S.L.U.,—D991,645, for a design for a “shoe.” According to the description of the drawings: “The portions of the sole bottom that are covered in a gray overlay and the portions that are not shown form no part of the claimed design.”