Claudia | The View Between Villages
sheepfilms

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
The Stonewall Inn
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

#extradirty
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

tannertan36
cherry valley forever
★

if i look back, i am lost

PR's Tumblrdome
Misplaced Lens Cap
𓃗

Doug Jones
Mike Driver
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

@theartofmadeline
seen from Chile
seen from Nepal
seen from United States
seen from Morocco
seen from United States

seen from Ukraine

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela

seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from Georgia
seen from Colombia
seen from United States

seen from Myanmar (Burma)
@cronchy-dumbass
Claudia | The View Between Villages

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
read "and then there were none"! we have:
killer
killer
killer
killer
killer
killer
killer
killer
killer
killer ultra pro max
this is so bad, i'm going to *remembers suicide jokes only worsen my mental health* ask Miss Claythorne if i can swim to that rock. Miss Claythorne, why can’t i swim out to the rock? i can. i know i can.
doctor armstrong attwn
(full ATTWN spoilers ahead!)
so i was having a conversation about and then there were none and lombard in general a while ago. i thought it was so stupid that killing 21 africans was deemed as “less bad” by the narrative than, like, vera killing a kid. it was something i just took for granted as a doylist thing, a byproduct of the racism of the time…
…until i realised, suddenly, that the fact that it’s stupid is part of the point.
wargrave is inherently an unreliable narrator. he kills these people based on his own individual definition of justice. he’s a white man in the 30s— of course his definition of justice would cast the killing of africans as inherently less villainous than the killing of whites. it’s the same definition that casts marston with less guilt because he’s “naturally evil”, and the same definition that casts vera with more for the crime of being a Hysterical Woman.
even if you say these people DID deserve to die, the manner of their deaths is a power fantasy come to life. in spite of its commentary on the ineffectiveness of the justice system, and then there were none isn’t a cathartic story of killers being brought to justice. it’s just as much a critique on the the power that the justice system has over individual lives— a massacre committed by a man who has been taught by the system that he has the right to play god, to decide who is deserving, to decide who gets to live and die. that’s how i read it, anyway.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
blorbos from blorbo island
Mr Swales my beloved
I hate it here
can anyone tell me the watch order for every movie ever so i can understand all references and homages
@dionrevel PLEASE share the link.
Lol sure!!
For movies, here is the beginner's list:
Beginner's guide for getting in the loop.
And the more advanced list:
Advanced guide to getting in the loop. Supplementary to "Civilization Essentials." If a movie is on this list, then it has one of these: -Po
Not all these movies are necessarily good, but the ones that gave me small pop culture epiphanies. It made me realize that 30%-40% of the jokes from modern sitcoms are references/parodies- and these movies are their source material.
^^ This is also true for socializing. So many people I thought were naturally funny were just doing movie bits.
[I actually do have a job, I am just a big fan of lists and graphs and flow charts etc.]
fellatio sounds like a supporting shakespeare character rather than oral sex on a penis to be honest
Your post sucks ass. Is that ok?
❤️YES NO

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
evil therapy speak claudius rings so true to me because it’s basically what he does in act 1 scene 2 anyway
because he constantly has to straddle the line between needing to appear loving and concerned for hamlet in that he is gertrude’s son but at the same time claudius constantly has to keep him in check through force or humiliation to ensure he’s not a threat to the throne. and so you get this whole speech where he pretends to be sympathetic to hamlet’s grief but also tells him it’s “unmanly” and trivializes his sorrow because everyone dies (HELLO?? imagine someone saying this to you after the death of a parent) then calls it a fault in hamlet to mourn his own father (!) and then ends it by telling hamlet he loves him. he knows exactly what he’s doing. he knows exactly how to manipulate the court and gertrude. and hamlet sees through it but if you’re only half listening or if you want to believe he really does love hamlet (as gertrude would dearly love to believe!) you could almost buy it
can you even imagine how fucking furious you would be if your uncle who married your mother a month after your father’s death proceeded not only to wrestle the throne from your grasp but publicly humiliate you in front of the court that is supposed to be yours about how you’re grieving your father? that it’s unmanly and pathetic to still mourn him after a month? and then tells you he’s only saying this because he loves you? and he thinks you shouldn’t go back to school, just stay here, where you can be together with your family and always be surveilled? the elsinore court really is a prison hamlet is so right
hamlet standing there tasting blood in his mouth while everyone around him admires how kind and benevolent claudius is toward his ungrateful nephew. i would not typically ascribe the virtue of self control to hamlet but it’s kind of incredible it took him 5 acts to kill him
horatio emailing professors post-hamlet, subject line “extension please,” body of the email is a single link to an article about the invasion of denmark with a clip of horatio crying
don pedro’s flop proposal gets me every time. what was he thinking
devastating
dunno if anyone's done this one before but anyway

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
απλά ζηλεύετε τα βοηθήματά μου #ταβοηθήματάμου🔥🔥🔥
#ταβοηθήματάμου
straight white people making a romance movie: haha what if it was illegal to have sex? wait what's lawrence v texas. wait what's mclaughlin v florida. wait what's loving v virginia
As preposterous and stupid as this fucking movie's premise sounded (for a light-hearted rom-com, and not The Handmaid's Tale) I didn't want to think about it too much until the movie actually came out, and then I could see if it was somehow more intelligent and subversive than the trailer let on, but guess what, it's even worse!
If this is what it takes to get a rom-com greenlit these days, maybe we should just let them die.
Sex workers are thrown under the bus, shown only as thieves who fleece men in the woods at night, while queer sexuality is relegated to a few scenes with Allie’s roommate (a woefully underused Quintessa Swindell) and a handful of pans past blurry same-sex extras making out in the background. “This night is for the straights,” Swindell’s character says to Allie, before saying that queer people have worked around straight laws for centuries. This is supposed to be a nod to queer resilience, but largely comes off as straightwashing the history of anti-LGBTQ legislation in this country that led towards raids of queer clubs and incarceration of queer people in the not-too-distant past (let alone the current barrage of anti-Trans and LGBTQ legislation currently in the works and on the books). It’s also ignorant of the long and fraught fight for the normalization of age-of-consent laws, which, by the way, did not happen in all states in this very country until 2003. Yes, that’s not even thirty years ago. By the end, our intrepid protagonists have not had sex with anyone, because this is a film about Romance with a Capital R (and I guess sex is not part of romance!) and for that very same reason they ultimately embrace the fascist state of things. They aren’t the only ones who refuse to fight back. No one in this cursed film is protesting this mandate beyond “repeal” signs in various windows and some creative graffiti (...) (...) If we are supposed to believe that the film is making some subversive statement about the state of sex and bodily autonomy in this country, it cannot end with its leads embracing their chains. That’s just warmed-over conservatism running around in sheep’s clothing.
yeah i wrote this post having only seen the trailer, but jesus christ. was this movie a psyop LMAO??
also, for the unaware: mclaughlin v. florida was a 1964 supreme court case that struck down a florida anti-miscegenation law that criminalized cohabitation (and thus, as implied, sex) between white people and people of color of opposite genders. anti-miscegenation laws made marriage and sexual relationships between white people and people of color, most often specifically black people, a FELONY in several states in the united states up until the 1950s and 1960s. though it was already struck down by the supreme court, the state of alabama didn't repeal their law until 2000! there were THREE ATTEMPTS at codifying anti-miscegenation into the us constitution!
like yes, the issue here is partially straight white people's ignorance on the united states's history of homophobic policy, but it's also really important to recognize that arguably the majority of the issue here is straight white people's ignorance of the united states's history of codifying eugenics and antiblack racism.
the premise could have been interesting as a serious dystopian story, especially taking that history into account, but it wasn't written that way at all. this movie should never have been a fucking romcom making light of the violence the united states (and many other countries) has enacted on any kinds of sexual relationships it deems undesirable.
can y’all maybe reblog this version i feel like people are forgetting about the racism and just focusing on the homophobia