Hiii, I made a side blog of my art account @clairer4rt because in this way I can reblog and write stuff without messing the other account 🥰
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Mike Driver
$LAYYYTER
d e v o n

titsay
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Today's Document
YOU ARE THE REASON

Kiana Khansmith

#extradirty

Discoholic 🪩
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

izzy's playlists!

tannertan36

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
todays bird

Product Placement
Claire Keane

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from Greece
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Ireland

seen from South Korea
seen from Venezuela

seen from Singapore

seen from South Africa

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from Ireland
@clairertalk
Hiii, I made a side blog of my art account @clairer4rt because in this way I can reblog and write stuff without messing the other account 🥰

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
This show's fandom is so hypocritical when it comes to which characters it wants to be accurate and the ones that can somehow be OCC and nobody gives a fuck about it.
Lestat has to be accurate but Louis and Claudia don't have to be because 'Louis in the book was a slave owner! We cannot depict slave owners be the good guys!' Which makes no sense because Louis was never supposed to be good guy, and because 'Claudia was a child in the books! Letting her be played by a child would be creepy!', and why would it be creepy? Because Rolin wouldn't be able to sexualize and do the disgusting rape subplot if she were a child?
I also noticed this double standard when it comes to Daniel, Armand and Marius.
An annoying as fuck 70 year old Daniel and a mustache twirling Armand is fine but Marius has to be accurate? I've seen posts say that Marius was exactly the same as he was in Blood and Gold, a book they haven't even read and about a character they think it's satan incarnate.
Not to mention Gabrielle, thankfully I've seen some say that it's a misogynistic caricature of her and I agree! Having her in the last ep force child Lestat to watch the burning of a friend of his, that GabriellA orchestrated by the way, was unnecessarily cruel and just another nail in the 'Rolin is a misogynist' coffin.
I wish this show does not get renewed but unfortunately I think it will.
I agree with you 100%
That fandom is toxic and stupid as fuck, I don't even try to be respectful anymore because they are showing hoe they lack of the bare understanding. Now they noticing problems, like racism and misogyny, which were present from ep 1 of s1. They are present in the production, in their fandom since always.
Then...GABRIELLA DOES WHAT? GOD I HATE THEM
And yes, the show will go on, I am sure of it. At least we will have a bit of peace in between
Rice on Adaptation
What movie do you not want to see?
I don’t understand: now Rolin Jones is a performative man because he went around with TVL book, but only because you guys hated the season
Ok
But, why amc TVL should have been LIKE the book while amc IWTV was not and that was ok?
Like which is the logic behind believing amc TVL would have been faithful to the book while all what happened before wasn’t? Amc Lestat CAN'T be Lestat, he is different so his story, his personality are different too like amc Louis was different from Louis. Why amc Louis was considered a better version because different, but amc Lestat needed to be like Lestat?
I have always said this: you can't overlap canon over something that has been completely changed, it can't work, because you are talking about two different thing, that need different things.
And all this problem many have with amc TVL was predictable since amc IWTV but everyone just ignored it and kept using books to understand this fanfiction of a show
these two have ruined my brain

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
today I learned that in 2008, the city council of florence overturned dante’s sentence of execution if he returned from exile. yes, dante’s inferno dante, who died in 1321.
but the funniest part of this is not that they were debating the exile of a man who has been dead for over 500 years.
the funniest part is that the vote was 19-5. five people voted to uphold dante’s exile.
The objectively funniest part of this is actually that the city that holds his remains, Ravenna, refused to give his remains back. This was a ploy from florence to have his remains moved back for the tourist money and its been ongoing for a long time. Florence had a fake tomb built in the city to trick people into visiting, and have tried to force the return of the remains.
His actual caretakers have been very steadfast in keeping them hidden, moved, or generally out of reach to respect his choice in life to never, ever, ever return to florence, even when he was first offered the chance to return. This is at this point an almost millenium long feud that florence is really, really mad about losing
so basically the five people who wanted to uphold his exile were in the right
Fandom Problem #15,702:
when new fans join the fandom and act like all of their headcanons and opinions are unique, when in actuality they're just repeating popular fanons and opinions from older fans
even worse is when they think of something that's already in canon and act like it's their original idea
Tiktok decided to fill me with Louis Garrel edits, give him green contact lens and we have Louis de Pointe du Lac
Today I updated my friend about Interview with the Misogynist show, she was disgusted
New fans shocked we marimand exists
Flash news, marimand exists since 1984, if you guys are stupid and can't connect your braincells is not our problem

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I hope against all hope in your character metal analysis you'll also do one for Daniel 🥹 🙏
He's not among the next characters (Louis and Marius), but if there is interest I'll do him as well🥰 or other characters
But I am a bit busy so I won't be fast😪
I loved your Armand and Lestat analysis, I feel like these sort of posts are sorely needed after how much misinformation is spread around the fandom in a way or another.
Are you planning doing it for another characters?
Thank youuu!!
Yes, I am doing them because the misinformation I found when I entered the fandom was too much, but it gave me the opportunity to think a lot about those characters, so I wanted to put my thoughts down and in doing so to find my people 🥺
Yes I am planning doing other characters, but I am a bit busy so I don’t know when I'll have the chance😭😭
Anne Rice and Rolin Jones with their copies of The Vampire Lestat. Rice at the time was working in an adaptation of the book.
The metaphor.
Lestat de Lioncourt (The Vampire Chronicles)
Lestat de Lioncourt is the protagonist of The Vampire Chronicles, but this was not always the case.
When Interview with the Vampire (1976) was published, he was the antagonist, but his character, so charismatic and mysterious, convinced Anne Rice to write his version of the story as well, The Vampire Lestat (1985), and from that moment on he became the undisputed protagonist and symbol of the entire saga.
He doesn't appear in:
Pandora (1998);
Blood and Gold (2001)
Talking about Lestat is no easy task. His story is a kaleidoscope of colours, emotions and events. Lestat has many adventures and suffers many tragedies, but despite everything, these never bring him down. On the one hand, he seems never to learn anything, right up to the end, he has to face the consequences of his ill-considered and self-centred actions, yet one could still say that he always lands on his feet.
Failure is not an option, even when one thinks it is.
His life doesn't begin so well: the youngest child, a black sheep, so much like his mother, but with the chance to try little escapes that are short-lived.
A human love full of affection, ruined by the world of darkness.
A traumatic turning.
Loneliness.
Death at the hands of a daughter.
But despite everything, Lestat has always looked at the world through the eyes of a child and behaves like one. He is curious, thirsty for knowledge, he knows that, as a vampire, he truly has the world at his feet, not as a predator, but as someone who really does have all the time in the world to discover everything there is to discover.
His greatest weakness is his fear of being abandoned, because he has learnt that sooner or later everyone leaves: Nicolas turned his back on him and chose death, Gabrielle went her own way, and Marius was forced to send him away.
But this realisation, unfortunately, does not help him with Louis and Claudia, on the contrary, it is the main reason why they turn against him, having been deeply hurt by his evasive behaviour and the many secrets he has kept hidden.
His actions do not go unpunished. There’s always a downside, which affects him but impacts those around him even more, and each time he doesn’t seem to have learnt his lesson. Something new comes along and he starts all over again: new discoveries, new adventures, new consequences, and someone ends up paying the price. And so it goes on until the end, when Armand finally tries to give him a wake-up call, fed up with how Lestat’s choices end up affecting them all.
Lestat, however, is hard to ignore, nobody can do it, either in the books or in real life.
Perhaps it is precisely this trait of his, being like a cockroach, which, the more you try to smash it, the more it just carries on hopping about cheerfully, that makes you shrug, shake your head and say: ‘Oh well, he makes me laugh.’
At a certain point, you become desensitised and just go with the flow, without even being surprised anymore. Does he want to become a saint? What’s the big deal? The day before, he was claiming to be the devil incarnate. Who knows what he’ll say the next day?
Lestat is the exact opposite of Louis, who had been portrayed in Interview with the Vampire as a ‘tragic hero’, a human voice disguised as a vampire, much more in line with the archetype of the romantic hero.
Lestat is the ideal hero: he grows stronger and stronger, he is loved by everyone even when he is hated, he embraces his nature and always bounces back after moments of discouragement. He always finds the bright side. Despite the minor tragedies he experiences, Lestat is neither tragic nor romantic, he is an positivist.
Bonus: Lestat's lovers
1.Nicolas
2.Gabrielle
3.Louis
4.Antoine
5.Akasha
6.David
7.Gertrude
8.Dora
9.Rowan
Yes this is much shorter than Armand, beacause if I used the same structure I think I was still writing. Fortunately Lestat does always the same stuff in his own way and it's easy to summery lol
Oh my god I can't imagine being in the 90s and having to wait and see what comes next after being done with Memnoch. 3 years between it and TVA...
That and I think I would have actually cried in relief if I thought Armand really died and then next thing I know there's a whole book just for him, knowing how normal I am about these characters.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Minoan fresco from the Aktotiri settlement, Thira, Greece
What I have always loved about the Merrick book plotline is that no one would ever know if that spirit was really Claudia or not. Merrick is not convinced it was her, but a spirit who knew what Louis was thinking and decided to mess with him.
This is so much better than a lazy confirmation about Claudia's thought, because guess what, when a person dies we would never know what they were thinking, there is always something that would be left unanswered. This is sad, painful, it hurt so much, but it’s reality.
Not even a personal diary can erase doubts, because you would never know why that person wrote something in a certain way, or if the words used are meant to be taken literally or they were just being dramatic. Hell if I read what I wrote in the past I would appear a totally different person (I was a drama queen sometimes lol). Merrick wasn't made to give a new Claudia exploration, but it was made to give Louis a closure. In fact it ends with his suicide and Lestat giving him back life AGAIN: new blood, new life.
I am not a fan of this book, because I don't like David as a narrator, but this plotline is really fascinating