My friend and I read this book together, 21 Decisive Battles of History. Every chapter is a different battle that changed the course of history: Syracuse, Hastings, Waterloo, Stalingrad, etc.
We paired it with a board/war game simulation for every battle. Read a chapter, do the war game simulation, on and on. It was an incredibly fun and insightful little project.
Recently discovered this book: Pictures At a Revolution. It covers the making of each of the movies on the 1967 Best Pictures: Dr. Doolittle, In the Heat of the Night, Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?, Bonnie & Clyde, and The Graduate.
The thesis is a bit clunky and not clearly stated, but the book is about the making of the movies, and how when they finally released in 1967 the world was different than when they were written/imagined in the early 60s. It also goes over how non-Hollywood films changed Hollywood forever.
We started off by going through and watching all of the movies.
In the Heat of the Night is fucking so solid. This movie is so good. I can't get over how good this movie is.
Dr. Doolittle sucks ass and it's clear they bought their nomination.
There's A LOT to say about Guess Who's Coming To Dinner?, but it's very white bread white coded white washed shit. Yah dude I'm sure a black maid runs around talking shit about The Black Panther Party I'm sure dude. Like.. fuck off you white liberal fucks take off the black face writing lines like that for a black actor. Shitheads.
Bonnie & Clyde is radical as all hell, but the dialogue is... awkward. PEOPLE DO NOT TALK TO EACH OTHER OR ACT LIKE THIS. EVER. ANYWHERE.
The Graduate is VERY GOOD, but I find the disdain on a proper education pretty disgusting. I guess the writer is one of those "home school" advocates (lunatics), which makes a lot of sense.
After we were done we started reading the book, and both of us quickly stopped...
The book is incredibly in-depth and the sources are impressive. The author clearly did a ton of work and it shows just reading through the footnotes.
The main issue for both of us is that the book assumes you know all the players, knows various film terms from the 60s like French New Wave, various European films, etc.
Without exaggerating, one page references roughly 10 obscure films that I've never heard of, but the books assume you have familiarity with them because it doesn't tell you fuck all about any of them. It's the same with writers, directors, producers, etc. It'll start talking about a random person and going in-depth about them and the networking/work they were doing without actually telling you WHAT FILM AND WHO THEY ARE IN REGARDS TO THAT FILM. Apparently you're supposed to ALREADY know they're the writer, director, whatever of this/that film.
Both of us were like "ya, I'm not sitting at a computer or with my phone to constantly go to wikipedia to figure out who this person being written about is and why I'm supposed to care."
It's bummers all around because you can tell this book is truly something special.




















