Workplace Meditations Abrasions
.(pending ability to post to LJ)
As I type this on November 5th, 2025, between 9am-11am (if I finish by then when itās over and people return to the land of cubicles here on West End), there is an In-Person-only Quarterly Basic Science Administrative Staff Assembly hosted by our Dean and central School of Medicine Deanās office inclusive of about 70-80 potential attendees, including myself.
I am purposefully, and what will likely be noticeably, not attending this session.Ā In a bit of unintended but timing-driven emphasis that I am on-site in our office complex is that with traffic, as I was getting onto the elevator on the 2nd floor around 8:30am from the connected parking garage, and twice as I went down the hallway on 5th floor towards my office, I passed by huddled, hurrying groups of my peers exiting towards this 9am meeting which is a fair walk across campus.Ā Simply to say, I had to say āhelloā and wave at the waves of persons heading in the opposite direction who likely all assumed I was dropping stuff in my office and doing an about-face to join their journey.Ā Only my two staff members who happen to be working on-campus today are aware that Iām not going, because I gave them advance notice yesterday to avoid the awkwardness of them coming to my office doorway with assumptions per normal weād be traveling as a group.
The thing is that Iām making a passive-aggressive sort of stand, an unvocalized complaint about the lack of what to me seems obviously inappropriate prior presentions in what had been originally billed as āmandatoryā meetings.Ā However I have chosen to interpret these as non-mandatory (for my justification of not attending), partly because administrative staff across the School who have existing permission to always work remotely, including Deanās office staff (one based in California, for instance) are NOT ever in attendance to this in-person-only meeting in past quarters.
The problem I actually began to compose about below back on 10/14/2024, the day after the first meeting I found uncomfortable and inappropriate as mandatory.Ā Ā However, my seemingly-important position nowadays, I just never have time to finish an entry for LiveJournal (and still have issues accessing that now-Russian-owned website at which no one from the past really exists or monitors anymoreā¦so truly a journal as it began back in 2000).
This was the first draft, unedited below (for pretend posterity), and Iāll pick up below that with thoughts since 2024ā¦.
<i> We had a quarterly Deanās office mandatory half-day meeting yesterday, to be attended by all administrators in the Deanās office, but also from the various departments and centers (so not lab folks).Ā These team-building things usually have one faculty member present a dumbed-down version of their scientific presentations they might do at seminars to give us a better sense of the research advancements and projects that our seemingly mundane office tasks help support to further inspire us that we are tangentially curing cancer or developing vaccines or find the cellular level issues leading to diseases or genetic anomalies.Ā Ā Often to a presentation on literal team building, like presentations on productive and non-confrontational inter- and intra-work relationships, maybe a āgameā that requires randomly assigned groups within the 80 or so attendees to solve some puzzle, and general discussions about upcoming institutional or school changes in policies or as with yesterday the new limitations of data storage.Ā Microsoft used to give universities unlimited storage on One-Drive and Teams when trying to encourage users to adopt, but now are starting to charge fees that become quite the huge bill when exponentially including all the administrative and research and student-generated data across the campus. </i>
The thing about my disinclination to attend these, my silly silent unspoken protest, is that at that during both that October, 2024 meeting and surprisingly but similarly pissing me off, at the random one on 02/12/2025 a few months later, there were what I considered to be āreligiousā presentations.Ā Iām certain the persons in the Deanās office coordinating speakers didnāt think of either in that realm, but that to me is the problem:Ā These are set-up and managed by the Deanās office assistant dean for HR, who herself and really amid her team of a half-dozen (or her bosses in the Deanās office) should have such concepts clearly on her radar.
In that October, 2024 meeting, one of the speakers they had were two women who work for our university in the āwellnessā area of HR, and one of them basically lead a discussion on the value of meditation to relieve stress BUT then the last 20 minutes of the presentation was essentially requiring everyone in the audience to be lead through steps to meditate in real-time, including the saying Ohmmmm or similar mantras, and closed it out by having everyone do those together and with increasing volume into a bit of a chorus of chant.Ā My bossās boss, who happened to be sitting near me, said to the speaker during the Q&A how she felt āsomethingā, felt moved by being a part of and surrounded by the sound of those voices Ohmmmmāing in unison.Ā BTW, I just sat silently, watching the crowd and obvious discomfort of some (and enthusiastic embrace by others), and most in the crowd talked about how positive an experience.
Well, the fucking reason my bossās boss felt moved is that this was basically like a version of shared prayer or hymnal singing in churchā¦which, quite simply, is not an appropriate thing to present in a āmandatoryā meeting at a non-religious university.
I think it is important to emphasize I do speak of this from a very-informed personal history.Ā During my teenage years, my mother veered away from our classic southern Baptist upbringing into studying eastern philosophies, including reincarnation, and truly in-depth studying (including leading classes) on Edgar Cayceās writings, became herself a certified hypnotherapist, and both she and I had both meditation training including sessions that led through our past-lives regressions (in theory I was once a chariot racer, who injured my left side, and throughout subsequent lives, including this one, itās tended to be my left side that has gotten injured: broken arm, major 10-speed bike crash with road-rash scars that still exist, on-and-on)Ā Though honestly, I donāt believe any of that-itās my moreso my Momās religionā¦which is my point:Ā Yes, meditation can relieve stress, but for thousands of years its basis is born of religious practices.Ā I suspect that mass catholic prayers, or mass Islamic daily prayers, or fuck even speaking in tongues in some of our more rural Tennessee churches probably all relieve stress as well, and I suspect these HR persons would understand that generally to be inappropriate in a mandatory workplace meeting, but perhaps their ignorance about religions OTHER than Christianity caused them to think this mediation lesson didnāt have a religious aspect.
Simply, donāt assume Iāve some weird prejudice against meditation or people who practice it, but to expect an employment-based group to attend such a thing mandatorily is akin to having a minister come and preach to us for an hour.
Thing is, Iām wrong above about people in theory at least having an awareness not to present Christian-based themes in a mandatory employment meeting.Ā In the next quarter meeting in February, 2025..damned if they didnāt inadvertently do this sort of thing again. The guest speaker is not only an Assistant Dean in our school, she was the DEI assistant dean at the time of this presentation (though with changes to federal funding rules this year, her title and role have had to adjust).
Her presentation was meant to be about career growth and navigating confidence in those pursuits, but her āexampleā was deeply rooted in and constantly referencing her religious beliefs, her upbringing in the church and her continued intense involvement, and how sheās using those structures and lessons in being a single parent to her middle-school-aged son.Ā Other black professional women the crowd literally began to put on or evolve into their presumed Sunday-personalities with raised hands of support and somewhat whispers of āpreach itā and this feed into the speaker leaning even more into that part of her talk.Ā I also found her to be rather condescending when she talked about her son wanting to pierce his ears, but that he didnāt understand that she was raising him right and was not willing to tolerate the types of body medication changes other less-informed parents might approve.Ā Really, given the diversity of our literal medical school with persons from around the world and certain many unfamiliar with the southern church childhood many of us experienced, I also felt her talk was non-inclusive because examples from church situations and lessons sheād assumed everyone understood were quite literally foreign.
And as a now-atheist, much of her talk was like nails on a chalkboard to me.
So, I didnāt attend todayās meetingā¦which people are now tricking back into my just-empty 5th floor of desks and sleeping computer screens.
Doubtful anything nor any conversation will even be raised to me by anyone, but then again ā sincerely, with my presence here since 1998, I am sort of a fixture (and often called out to provide feedback or facts about things during meetings without volunteering)ā¦my guess is that I at least caused some folks to wonder why.














