Tag Directory

oozey mess
The Bowery Presents
Monterey Bay Aquarium

pixel skylines
Sweet Seals For You, Always
$LAYYYTER
trying on a metaphor
Sade Olutola

Cosimo Galluzzi

Love Begins
sheepfilms
KIROKAZE
almost home
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

ellievsbear
official daine visual archive
Misplaced Lens Cap
seen from Netherlands

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from Morocco
seen from Morocco
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Philippines
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from New Zealand

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@boundlessemperorvalkyrie
Tag Directory

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
A rough guideline for Gotham City's Post-Crisis chronology: Part 1.
A cheatsheet of in which order each Gotham vigilante debuted and a broad overview of some major crossover arcs that affected everyone in Gotham between the aftermath of Crisis on Infinite Earths (1986), and Batman: Legacy (1996).
I'm gonna be making some comics reading guides for the female characters of Gotham City (Babs, Steph, Cass, Helena Bertinelli, Leslie Thompkins, Sarah Essen, Renée Montoya, each of Bruce’s LIs, etc. etc.) but decided to start with a more general Post-Crisis chronology of Batman-related titles. For what? For why? Well, why not. It's helpful mapping out the order of when a character debuted relative to the rest and what was going on at the time events-wise. I will drag whoever follows me into the depths of caring about DC women hell. So. I think I'll have to break it up into parts, actually. Expect part 1 some time today.
I have a theory that certain niches of zoosadist content are political, and the viewers are using the animal as a replacement for who they actually want to hurt. It's just easier and less risky for them to access content where animals are used. This is based on an exposé a while back that involved a lot of Trump supporters paying for animal torture content, I will let you know if I find/remember the article covering it
Found what I was thinking about
It's not just the flags in the background of this particular video distributor that made me suspect such motives, but if you read the article, the way viewers are talking about and engaging with the content. It's hateful.
@innerchildabortionclinic is right about monkeys being a stand in - i believe this podcast covers the way the monkey torture was a stand in for child abuse for some of the consumers, with the same people being busted with monkey torture and CSAM on their harddrives.
“What was so appealing was to see something else suffer, essentially, that looked human,” he said. “Because I was suffering.” <- quote from the article linked above, but the video really digs into the other angles if I recall correctly
I love the game Mouthwashing so dearly and I firmly believe it should not be engaged with like a fandom because of the behavior I’ve seen towards Anya. Given the themes of the game, the way people treat her is so absolutely fucking disgusting. I’ve seen her submitted to ‘this character pregnant’ and ‘would they get an abortion’ gimmick blogs, the tag is flooded with yaoi of her rapist and his enabler, and the sexy cosplays of Anya on TikTok were…dire. Free my girl, holy fuck
anya mouthwashing propaganda!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
men will complain 'but women forced their way into male spaces first' and they mean like. steady employment, hobbies or politics
also like. video games and movies/fandom (often based on books by or directed by women)
meanwhile men in women’s spaces is like. our changing rooms. reminds me of that dianic wiccan quote about how the men only want to be included in women’s events when the women are naked
Hell yeah Zsuzsanna
can i be honest for a sec. if you see one of those things where they draw male comic book characters in female characters’ poses or use female video game characters’ animations with male models or whatever and your response is “haha yay i love it when men are sluts” you should strongly consider shutting up forever.
seeing a certain post go around again. i don’t know how to tell you guys this but the reason it’s funny to watch ganon run around like zelda is because the edit exposes the inherent lack of dignity in that kind of hyperfemininity. the humor comes from the juxtaposition between a “strong” and “serious” character and the visual signifiers of womanhood. they were crucifying anita sarkeesian in the mainstream for this surface level feminist analysis over a decade ago.
2012.
Fandom Misogyny Victim Tournament
Round Three, Bracket 3
Cassandra Cain (DC Comics) vs. Abbie Mills (Sleepy Hollow)
Cassandra Cain
Abbie Mills
Propaganda below the cut:
On the note of attractiveness, I love being fat and ugly. I love men's shocked faces when an ugly overweight bitch rejects them. I love when guys flash their money and success like I give a fuck about anything but sitting my fat ass in my garden and watching birds go by. I love how they start foaming at the mouth when I laugh in their faces. A guy once asked me what I could offer a man who "fucks a different woman every night and drives fast cars every weekend", and I swear he had a psychotic break when I laughed and told him no woman wants a used man.
It's just a total power move to move through the world fat, unshaven, crooked and big nosed face untouched by makeup, and watch the shock and horror on men's faces when you still don't want them.
They really think an ugly woman will be desperate. They think I should be flattered and thankful that they graciously lowered themselves to a homely girl's level and bestowed their attention upon me. Their utter shock when you could give a fuck less is endlessly entertaining.
I'm sweaty, I'm large, I'm hairy, I'm loud and funny and hungry, and they haaaate that all their money and looks and cars and baby mamas or whatever they think will impress women still doesn't sway me.
I'm a walking power move.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Little moments of Magic
(c) gif by riverwindphotography, July 2026
it's really is like there's a torture machine for women and everybody knows about it and it's called the Women's Torture Machine and everyone's like "yesssss let's put women in the torture machine" so they teach little girls to embrace the torture machine and they force every woman they can inside & every so often there's someone who isn't a woman but shares enough characteristics w society's constructed definition of womanhood that they're are like "close enough into the torture machine you go" & anytime a woman goes "it's unforgivably evil that women have to live w the threat of the torture machine" people on tumblr dot com go "ummmm actually it's not just women that get put in the torture machine are you a terf"
& ALSO if you say "women the torture machine is not inevitable we can escape the torture machine don't let them put you in the torture machine" someone will go "yessss if you don't like the Women's Torture Machine it might be that you don't actually belong there bc you're not a woman!! free yourself and only yourself from the torture machine!!" and if u tell them that's not remotely what you said you are once again yuppp you guessed it. a terf
male: i like hitting women
liberals: boo!! disgusting!!!
male: hitting women TURNS ME ON, it makes me COME
liberals: YESSSS!!! BE PROUD OF YOUR KINKS!!!! YAYYY!!! BE COMFORTABLE TO TALK TO US ABOUT YOUR KINKS 🥹🥹!!! YOU ARE LOVED!!! 🥰 ❤️
So this is indeed where consent comes into play.
If someone says "I would like to hit you, but not if you aren't comfortable with it, and not if it won't make you feel good. I will take care of you afterwards to make sure that you're comfortable and minimize any unwanted pain after we have finished our scene," that is not the same as just "I enjoy beating up random women."
Many things involved in kink, if not for the aspect of asking for and maintaining consent, would be rape, or abuse, but because consent is asked for and maintained, it is not.
The entire point of kink is that both participants are willing and wanting. Someone who enjoys being hit, if they are actually just a kinkster and not a rapist, will not engage in their kink with an unwilling partner. If they do, then yes, that's abuse, but the kink itself is not inherently abusive.
This is also why aftercare is so incredibly important, especially when involving physical play elements like impact play. Someone who just wants to hit someone would not stay afterwards to make them comfortable, take care of them, and nurse any injuries they may have sustained. But again, within kink, that takes place, and is yet another distinction.
I'm not expecting the person I'm reblogging this from to see this or give a shit if they do, but hopefully someone who's a little uncertain about kink will see this and feel a little better about what they're into.
please just shut the fuck up for once in your life. wanting to get the shit beaten out of you as a sex thing is not healthy or normal in the slightest and people with that low of self esteem need extreme therapy. people who want to beat the shit out of others as a sex thing need a bullet in the back of the head. any questions?
So @comprehensive-sex-ed since you’re very FUCKING slow, let me put it into simple terms your porn soaked pea brain will understand:
Women stay with men who beat them under all kinds of different complex pressures every single day. Sufficiently abused women will even refuse to press charges or testify in court.
These pressures don’t magically go away when the scrote gets hard when he beats her and demands a “yes”.
it’s not fucking hard if you care one iota about women.
the year is 2035. the new beauty standard is for women to cut their ears off, as ears are a masculine trait which make the face look too big and hearing isnt necessary as it doesnt align with being demure. evil feminists say perhaps this is unnecessary and ears are natural. women are agressively proclaiming they are cutting their ears off due to sensory issues
“Most men don’t even care if a woman cuts her ears off. They don’t even notice! Women cut their ears off for other women.”
“Most women I know cut their ears off because they want to and like how it looks.”
“The majority of women aren’t doing this for you, they cut their ears off for themselves, to feel more confident and put together”
“I did it for myself. I don't like the feel of having ears and my earlobes would get infected from my earrings. And I like the look without them.”
“I didn’t cut my ears off, I don’t see the reason to. I always wear a hat in public anyway.”
(Btw: All of these are paraphrased real responses from women on reddit when asked “Why do you wear makeup?” and “Why do you shave?”)
This is your reminder today that Irene Adler in the original Conan Doyle story is literally not a criminal. She never commits a crime.
Nor is she a seductress in any kind of negative or manipulative sense - she has a mutual relationship with a powerful man who then breaks up with her, and afterwards she keeps protection against him in the form of evidence that the relationship existed. She HAS blackmail material, she even waves it at him threateningly because he treated her like shit, but she never even uses it.
Irene Adler is not a thief, femme fatale, or blackmailer. She's just a cool lady that wants to be left alone.
@delphi-star You do recall correctly!! She does not give a shit about that man! She's happily married! She tipped him for being a witness at her wedding!
If your Sherlock Holmes adaptation has a character whose identifying qualities are that she is a seductive criminal in love with Holmes, you have created a character that is basically the literal opposite of Irene Adler and you should name her something else.
She's also -- and I cannot stress this enough -- from New Jersey. IMO this is the single most important detail missing from all the adaptations -- IRENE ADLER IS FROM NEW JERSEY.
Please just once in my life I would like to see this adapted faithfully it would be the funniest fucking thing ever.
Yall gotta get into the podcast Sherlock & Co., they handled A Scandal In Bohemia fucking beautifully
she’s not remotely interested in Sherlock, she’s not manipulative, she’s from New Jersey (no thick Jersey accent though) SHE EVEN GETS TO STAY AN OPERA SINGER!!! THEY ALWAYS CHANGE HER IN MODERN ADAPTIONS BUT SHE GETS TO DO OPERA!!!!
Please listen to Sherlock & Co. it’s such a good podcast and is arguably one of the best modern adaptations of the original stories ever made

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
A woman said it before me, but I do believe women are better at seperating fiction from reality than men are, and can actually. I ain't know why, but it literally continously proves itself to be true. I see it all the damn time, even with myself. Maybe it's cause men's fantasies are already encouraged and endorsed by reality (even the ones man perceives as defiant rely on patriarchal societies principles), while women's are starkly different and we are constantly reminded of that? We know we have actual fantasies, while men just fantasize about adjacent realities?
I’ve thought about that a bunch - I read the original post and it was specifically referring to violent self-written fiction - and I’ve come to the conclusion that the real distinction is that men are the ones committing the violence and abuse and women are the ones taking it. Every woman who says “men can strangle women if they want, you kink shamer!” is brainwashed; it’s just that she’s been brainwashed into taking violence and telling other women to take it, whereas men have been told “if you want to strangle a woman, great news! You live in a society that is eroticising that.”
Let me settle the 'is it fetishism and is it bad?' debate once and for all:
Being attracted to any kind of body is normal. Fat bodies. Trans bodies. Disabled bodies. All normal. Being extra attracted to a specific kind of body is normal too. Totally normal to have a type.
Not unlearning the societal stigma attached to those kinds of bodies, the people who inhabit those bodies, and the people who fuck them, to the point where you do any of the following:
Only want to date/fuck the person in secret.
Reduce the person to the feature that you desire and ignore the rest of who they are as a person.
Expect the person to be a walking porn fantasy instead of a real person with their own sexual preferences and boundaries.
Would no longer love the person if the stigmatized aspect of their body changed.
Consider yourself superior to the person, think the person should be 'grateful' that you love their body, etc.
See the person as a temporary adventure while planning to eventually settle down with someone whose body isn't stigmatized.
Is bad and harmful and you shouldn't be dating anyone until you've worked on your shit, because this makes you a very terrible partner. This doesn't mean you are a bad person with bad-fetishist-desires who can only desire people badly, it means you need to unlearn societal stigma so you can be a better partner to the people you desire.
Thank you for coming to me ted talk.
And please don't describe your interest in a marginalized human body shape as 'kinky' or 'being into some freaky shit'.
Imagine what it means to tell a person that sexual attraction to their body isn't normal.
I love kink but liking a type of body is NOT kinky and it sure as hell isn't freaky. It's regular human-to-human attraction. It's as vanilla as it gets.
#frankly this is how people treat women (in varying ways depending on numerous axes but all stemming from baseline misogyny) #women are essentialized as merely a body by dint of the sexgender-class #of course this veers off from the premise of fetishism vs attraction to an extent but I wanted to draw #a connection to how being a woman whatsoever you are treated as a fetish (an object) (meant for sex sans interiority/essential humanity) #(disposable & easily damaged + replaced)
Oh yeah that's accurate.
Some of the items on the list are specifically about the stigma of 'I shouldn't desire this person' (like only want to date/fuck the person in secret and planning to eventually settle down with someone whose body isn't stigmatized)
But a lot of them also just come from seeing the other person as inferior, not a complete person and certainly not as important as your needs and desires. That is also how plenty of men see women.