#MarGotKidsGambling
I donât know what planet Margot James, Minister of State for the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport is living on, probably somewhere in the far reaches of No Manâs Sky. Unbelievably, she has concluded that loot boxes do not constitute gambling because skins canât be traded offline. Â Thatâs like saying using online bookmakers wouldn't really be gambling if it wasnât possible to sell a winning bet to a mate down the pub. Iâve never felt the need to call for a Ministerâs resignation more than I do right now and itâs not just James that needs to go, the whole department needs a rethink; do they actually have any gamers on their staff? I very much doubt it. Iâm tempted to instigate a freedom information request just to find out if anybody in her department has heard of Skins.Cash, CS.Money, Skinbaron, Skin.club or Bitskins. They all trade CS:GO skins for hard cash and thatâs just one game. The link between gaming disorder and an addictive personality is well and truly established and it just so happens; thatâs an ideal personality to develop a gambling addiction. So, why on earth isnât she doing something to protect the young gamers that are exposed to the lure of loot box gambling? Thereâs a whole heap of parents out there that donât really engage with their childrenâs gaming activities much beyond applying time constraints. They misguidedly trust the Government to put in place protective measures. Well, hereâs the thing: That ainât happening while James is at the helm. There must be some way to instigate her resignation on grounds of gross incompetence? Itâs a shame that we are avoiding exposure at this stage in our product development; if we had loads of followers we could probably do something. But we donât, so maybe share this with people that do "MarGotKidsGamblingâ perhaps?
Not convinced? At the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee inquiry into immersive and addictive technologies, James said: âI would contest the assumption that loot boxes are gambling and I donât think that all the evidence that Iâve read from your committeeâs hearings would support that assumption either. âLoot boxes are a means of people purchasing items, skins, to enhance their gaming experience, not through an expectation of an additional financial reward and importantly they canât be traded offline for money, so I think that there are big differences.â Ok Margot, if you ever pick up an AWP | Dragon Lore Iâll bung you a fiver, meet me on CS.Money. Oh hang on, I forgot you donât really play video games. Moreâs the pity. #LootboxGambling #MarGotKidsGambling Keith Anderson - Managing Director
















