Parchment's Scroll

....is a given character having sex as if they're experienced with intimacy? Do they seem confident or unsure of themselves? Are they taking charge or letting their partner lead things? Are they being affectionate in ways that aren't inherently sexual, such as kissing and cuddling? Do they do anything just for their partner or only seem to care about what feels good to themselves? Do they ever look at their partner or keep their eyes closed? Is it casual or intense? Aggressive or gentle?? Do they get totally naked or keep something on? Did they take any time to find somewhere more private or just dive into it with no concern? Was this spontaneous or was there prior indication was there that these characters were physically attracted to one another? How mutual did the attraction seem to be? Is it purely physical or is it *love?* Does that apply to all parties involved? Is this good for them? Does it have any significance to any of their other relationships? If so, do they care, and is any of the above affected by that? How many of these details align with what you already knew or felt about these characters, versus how many reveal a side to them they had been hiding?

I know the question is also just being silly, but it would even tell you a lot about a character if it turned out "position" and ""slurpiness" were the only factors that stood out to them about human intimacy. That'd basically be this guy:

It's one of the most character-defining scenes in the movie, showing that while he is, on the surface, her romantic ideal, he absolutely is lying to her face while taking advantage of her both physically and also materially.

Next up someone is going to claim that the Narnia series isn't kids books.

Heres a not so friendly reminder, as an lgbt metis person, i dont give a single fuck what your blog is themed or if this is too painful for you to look at. Reblog this post. Reblog this post with the sources of the 751 children who were found.

Your compliance and silence as well as the compliance and silence of your ancestors is what allowed these schools to open and kill first nations children. The children of MY people.

Dont follow me if you cant reblog this post or the one with sources to your political blog or your most popular blog. Add trigger warnings if you must but if your political blog is only focused on the harms you personally face like being lgbt then you need to see some bigger pictures and stop being afraid of angering your racist mutural or actually saying some shit about racism. If you can reblog some antifa graphics or add blm to your bio to be a surface level ally, you can reblog some sources on the genocide first nations people faced and still face today.

They were CHILDREN.

I’d like to add this photo I took last night in Victoria of the statue of Captain Cook. Though I myself am not indigenous, I 100% agree that these murderers, kidnappers and rapists shouldn’t have huge statues and plaques that decorate them and say how “great” they were.

Here’s another photo of the legislative assembly from yesterday. Later on there were more items, candles and signs at the memorial, as well as a big poster with 1505 painted on it but I didn’t get a picture

People need to see this. Not just quickly glance at the photos and keep on scrolling. They need to see this.

I went to a “Cancel Canada Day” event and burst into tears - not because I was surprised to learn of the unmarked graves (survivors told us they were there. Our government pushed it aside, and we let them), but because seeing all the people gathered in mourning drove it home: They. Were. Children.

This is my country’s legacy - and it’s not history. The last schools closed during my lifetime. My Father went to school with students who lived at the local residential school, after it was changed to a boarding house (read: holding centre) for indigenous youth who went to local schools.

Liberalism in a nut shell “we can still mass deport immigrants as long as we give them due process “

Case in point: Tsun Zu's rival defended a city with 10 men against Tsun's army of hundreds by disarming his own soldiers, dressing them in plain clothes, INVITING Tsun's army to come in, and it only worked because Tsun knew the guy was an ambush master and thought "if we attack the city he's inviting us into, we will die." and left without even trying ON THE BASIS OF HIS RIVAL'S REPUTATION AND NOTHING MORE

Another example: Tsun Zu, on being told his soliders were out of arrows during a battle against a city across a river from them, had his men craft scarecrows, put them on a boat, send it out on a line, leave it there for half an hour, then pull it back in and used the arrows the enemy had fired at the boat to restock their own ammunition. It only worked because it was foggy and the enemy couldn't tell the difference between the scarecrows and actual soldiers.