im wasted on cross country

Q. You want to raise every boy as a girl? Yes.

Q. Why? A boy will learn to hate girls as long as he is raised in such a way where he is treated as better, and superior to, his girl peers, whenever he is cruel to girls. So, instead, we raise boys as girls.

Q. What if they say they are not a girl, and want to be acknowledged as boy? Then you know they are a boy, so you must make sure to understand them as boy, and not a girl.

Q. What does it mean to be 'raised as a girl'? That's up for you to decide. The only difference is that you should not raise boys any differently than you raise girls, since you raise every boy as a girl.

Q. Girls and boys are raised in specific ways for specific purposes, so it does not make sense to raise boys as girls. If you raise every boy as a girl, then there is no being which is not raised as a girl, so anyone raised as a girl necessarily must learn to do anything and everything to grow up, without restrictions on tasks, labours, or interests.

Q. But boys and girls are different. All two girls are different, and raising girls in one specific way destroys this individuality in favour of moulding girls to serve the same master. Still, the girls resist to live life on their own terms. If girls can be raised such that they know they can do anything they want, including not being girls, so too will boys raised as girls.

Q. Why not raise every girl as a boy? Because if a girl does not exist among boys, then the girl is made.

Q. Why not raise girls and boys as themselves? The self must be made in a world where girls and boys can first and foremost be themselves. One step towards this goal is to raise every boy as a girl.

Q. The way people raise girls is cruel, so why would you raise boys with that cruelty? If you raise girls with cruelty, then you should stop being cruel to girls.

Q. Why?

A boy will learn to hate girls as long as he is raised in such a way where he is treated as better, and superior to, his girl peers, whenever he is cruel to girls. So, instead, we raise boys as girls.

instead of situating boys as the default, this essentially situates boys as the deviation. just straight out of the gate. girls, here, are the default. 'boyhood' is seen as dependent on the factor of 'being better'. thus;

Q. Why not raise every girl as a boy?

Because if a girl does not exist among boys, then the girl is made.

if "a lesser" does not exist among "betters," then "a lesser" is made. there is no "better" without a "lesser".

instead, the proposal is to raise exclusively "lessers". and this time, there's no desire for "a better" to exist. who wants to be "lesser", and how can you be "lesser" without "a better"? without "a better", the "lesser" merely turns into... the default. again.

and get this! that's not even the complete purpose of the text!

see, unlike with the raising of boys, (re: 1st Q.) the text takes extreme care to not describe how the raising of girls is.

Q. What does it mean to be 'raised as a girl'?

That's up for you to decide. The only difference is that you should not raise boys any differently than you raise girls, since you raise every boy as a girl.

because why are you uncomfortable? what about 'raising boys like girls' makes you uncomfortable?

Q. But boys and girls are different.

Q. Girls and boys are raised in specific ways for specific purposes, so it does not make sense to raise boys as girls.

Q. The way people raise girls is cruel, so why would you raise boys with that cruelty?

If you raise girls with cruelty, then you should stop being cruel to girls.

how do you raise girls? <- the main thought exactly.

just. a perfect work overall. this is just genius.

(and 'well, obviously.' answers such as this one are all very smooth leads back into the main point of the work—they do not let you stop thinking about what they want you to think about!!!!!!!! everything has its goal and purpose!

Q. What if they say they are not a girl, and want to be acknowledged as a boy?