with most admired disorder...

mushroom: can you feel your heart burning? can you feel the struggle within? the fear within me is beyond anything your soul can make. you cannot kill me in a way that matters

Ask and You Shall Receive!

*Quiz 1 has an average score of 40% and Quiz 2 has an average score of 25%

If you wanna support an Indigenous LGBTQ+ artist who is very much relying on any and all shop orders and freelance art opportunities to pay their bills, consider checking out my online shop!!! I'm running a 20% off sale on everything!! Just click the link below and/or use the code "GAY" at checkout!!

THIS SALE WILL END IN FOUR DAYS, ON JUNE 15!!

1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.

2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.

3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."

4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.

Levi's said yes, actually. Assless chaps and a biker vest. Happy Pride.

how measurements work in canada (ie/ badly)