A lot of unknown in the story. The Sladen Suit is basically a wetsuit for a diver, used to be able to breathe underwater. The Sladen Suit just happens to be in the captain's quarters, which nobody has been. Overall, a lot of assumption goes into this stories. No clue what happened to the characters who entered the Sladen Suit. The suit is for survival...the signifier is changing in the story. What is representing survival and safety is now death. What is on the other side? Pugatory, the future, death, entrapment?
The Narrator is a person who is watching a man known as Hurlock. It involves pieces of papers based off of propositions. Using these propositions he comes up with this phrase "Red Haze Nimbly." He searches for this phrase and becomes obsessive about it. Hurlock ends up disappearing one night. There is a lapse in the camera feed and who ever is watching Hurlock comes back, and he is gone. They have a weird robot thing called a "construct." It is half mechanical and half organic, and it would take it memories by going in his ears. He thinks he will eventually disappear himself. The story ends without us knowing if the narrator is taken. Are they taken or transported to another world? He uses all of these rules to give himself meaning. The robot wears the skin of a human...and maybe the robot symbolizes jealousy.
About three people: a detective, a pathologist, and a district attorney. It divides into three themes of knowledge. The detectives episteme can be summarized as "To know is to reveal the truth." The district attorney's is "to utter is to create the truth." The third episteme of the pathologist is "knowledge is control." It seems like the author gave every character their own definition of knowledge and assigned it to them. The corpses were used as a symbol or main point of an idea. He would say he doesn't believe the pathologist, and the pathologist would prove his findings, and he always asks why. He just gets frustrated with the district attorney. The pathologist tells the D.A. the facts and the D.A just says okay and agrees, where the detective is angry and does not believe this. The last line: "Which is precisely why I have not written my detective novel."At the end you expect to come to some sort of conclusion, and there was no conclusion at the end of this story. Is the reader trying to tell us something here?
He's on the floor and sees his tooth bloody. It goes into conversation with his therapist. He doesn't know the difference between a baby or a doll. He doesn't know which was isn't alive. Later on we come to find out as he goes on figuring it out, he sees a reflection of himself. Was everything he experienced real or not? Just like most of the other stories in this book. There is no truth in anything. In the beginning he finds a comfort in false truths. Author tries to distract us from the main points, by putting in these gruesome images. Ignorance is bliss--when you find out the truth what do you do next? Maybe the therapist was just the thoughts in his own head talking to himself. He's in a sense of what is going on so he can move on.
Starts off in a tunnel with three different characters told in three different perspectives. Lindscold, the Old Man & Jansen are three of the characters. "It was if none of them knew what was really happening to them." It is very interesting how similar all of these stories really are. There is also an old man in the story and they don't know whether he is alive or not.
"South of the beast he poured through the bodies, searching for occasions where, in the membrane still integumented between flesh and bone, language had become caught and not yet worked free of a corpse." Lots of creative language and vivid imagery throughout the story. Started off really intense talking about the beast and flesh and bone. Living up to your own name and finding your own words. It's often difficult to find the right words to tell somebody something. The end was a little gruesome with his fingernails peeled back. He was trying to tell you his issues and experiences, and insecurities of his own writing.
These stories all seem to have giant symbols. The class found it interesting how similar all of these stories really are. Lots of recurring themes. Lots of vivid imagery and use of language.