Activism to archivism, archivism to activism
“The greatest modernizers inaugurate their career with a backward leap, and a renaissance proceeds through a return to the past, a recycling, and hence a revolution. [...] Behind the ‘re’ of reformation, republic or revolution, there is a hand flicking through the pages of a book, from the end back to the beginning”.
– Régis Debray (‘Socialism and Print’, 2007)
Researching the Provo movement, and its post-Provo offshoots, it is impossible not to be struck by the symbiotic relationship between the archivist and the activist – two roles that are fully dependent on each other. Activism generates archives, archives generate activism – and so forth.
Let’s not forget that Provo, a movement that might appear to some people as phenomenon without history, was in fact very much inspired by the early socialist, anarchist, and pacifist movements that existed in the Netherlands between the First and Second World War (decades before the birth of Provo).
In Niek Pas’ important book ‘Imaazje: De Verbeelding van Provo, 1965–1967’ (Wereldbibliotheek, 2003), there is a wonderful paragraph in which Rob Stolk recalls that, during his childhood years, he was very impressed by the book shelves of Van der Veen, the father of a friend. Through these shelves, Rob came across revolutionary thinkers such as Domela Nieuwenhuis (1846–1919), whose ideas would become very influential to Provo. In other words, it were book collections, libraries and archives that served as some of Provo's biggest inspirations.
And all throughout the actions of Provo, the archive continued to play an important role. Already during its existence, Provo actively documented itself – magazine articles were saved, photos were collected, scrapbooks were compiled.
During some of the Provo happenings that took place around Het Lieverdje (the statue at Spui Square), a large cardboard folder was carried around, adorned with a brick wall pattern. This folder contained a large collection of newspaper clippings, all on the subject of Provo. The role of this cardboard folder was almost ritual – it was placed against the statue, people dancing around it frantically, bearing torches and slogans. Seen that way, the archive became the heart of the happening, the center of the movement itself. The archive was transformed into a battery, an accumulator, a generator of activism.
A very concrete example of this (activism being generated by the archive) took place during the final stages of Provo. Immediately after the 1967 liquidation (or better said, self-liquidation) of Provo, Rob Stolk and a couple of his close friends decided to sell their personal Provo material to the library of the University of Amsterdam (UvA). This act (the selling of the archive) was certainly meant as a conceptual, artistic gesture: as the “final provocation”. A special committee was invented (the ‘Provo Liquidatie Commissie’), and managed (after bluffing that an American university was interested in buying the archive) to make a deal with the University of Amsterdam – in total, a sum of 13.010,- guilders was paid for the archive.
The transfer of this archive was actually captured on film. The movie (quite proto-punk in its conception – part Great Rock & Roll Swindle, part Great Train Robbery) shows Rob and his friends, dressed as gangsters, driving around in Amsterdam while carrying plastic machine guns and a large trunk filled with archival material. After the trunk was delivered at the university, the Provos (still dressed as mobsters, and carrying toy guns) went to the bank to deposit the money – where they were immediately arrested by police officers who thought they stumbled onto an actual bank robbery.
Adding even more to the conceptual, ludic (and self-mythologizing) nature of the transaction was the list of absurdist conditions stated by the Provo Likwiedaatsie Kommissie. For the next five years, none of the material was allowed to be reproduced – while for a period of twenty-five years, the correspondence (the part of the archive that was gifted rather than sold) could only be visited with strict permission of the Kommissie. At the same time, all members of the Kommissie (Rob Stolk, Loe/Lou van Nimwegen, Robert Jasper Grootveld, and Steef Davidson) had unlimited access to the archive.
In Derek Taylor’s ‘It Was Twenty Years Ago Today’ (Bantam Press, 1987), Rob describes the transaction as follows:
“In fact it wasn’t an archive at all, just some scattered documentation, if you want to call it that. We spread a rumour via some journalist that the Provo archive would be sold to an American university, so the University of Amsterdam decided to buy the archive itself. They paid 13.010 guilders for it, at that time a huge amount of money, and then they started a real archive. A lot of people were interested in the movement but heard about it only when Provo was already dead so for us it was really useful – we could say ‘Go and read about it!’...
Now the University has a big department with all kinds of material and publications of those times, from any country in the world where something was happening. So now there is a big archive”.
From the 13.010,- guilders that the Provo Likwiedaatsie Kommissie received from the University of Amsterdam, 3.000,- guilders were donated to Robert Jasper Grootveld, and his Lowland Weed Company. The rest of the money (10.000,- guilders) was used to found (and fund) the ‘Stichting ter Bevordering van een Goed en Goedkoop Leven’ (‘Foundation for the Promotion of Good and Cheap Living’), an action committee that played a crucial role in both the early squatters’ movement (Woningburo De Kraker) and Aktiegroep Nieuwmarkt (the resistance against the total demolition of the Amsterdam’s Nieuwmarkt area).
In other words, it was the death of Provo (and the act of selling of the archive) that enabled these new movements to take place – like a Provotarian phoenix rising from its ashes. A very clear illustration of activism being generated by an archive that was generated by activism.
The Provo archive remained in the library of the University in Amsterdam until 1990 (carefully maintained by people like archivist-activist-artist Tjebbe van Tijen), until it was transferred to the International Institute of Social History (IISG), where it is currently accessible to the public – and hopefully functions as a new generator for both activism and archivism.