Qmklx M Ewo Alex’w Fvsyklx Csy Livi?

Think of the posts “free my girl—sure, yeah, she does all that shit, but y’all misunderstand her character” and “I support women’s wrongs!” Then apply this energy to Tamala. Allow her to be mischievous, beguiling, kinda shady, teasing/mocking, arrogant, condescending, anti-social, ruthless, and bold. She can be all these things *and* be a great ally to have in your corner. She’s quick witted and intensely knowledgeable under her bewitching exterior. She’s a force to be reckoned with practically imploring someone to see right through her. Tamala is absolutely someone who values a meeting of the minds and is looking for someone who can meet her beat-for-beat. Such character will rub people the wrong way. If Tamala were fucking real, to that she’d say, “Fuck if I care if I rub people the wrong way.”

Like—the woman who sells people likely/potentially illicit flow beauty creams with false/misleading information also has lines like, “Watch your step, these woods are not the safest,” and “Hope you're having a better day than I,” and “It's dangerous to wander these woods alone.” The same woman says, “It's so nice to have others hanging on your ever word; you can get them to do practically anything you want,” will also tell the player, “I don't need your company....but it would certainly be appreciated.” She canonically loves nature and bugs and is rightfully wary about The Order, but she is also running a shady potion business on the side and nearly every character tells you to be wary of her. She mentions being stressed and she admits to being lonely and offers you wine when you’re sad, but also is very dismissive of and a bit unkind about her past lover’s admiration of her. (His poetry describes her as sly and remorseless 🙄, despite sight of her curls making his heart sing chorus 😂, plus her dialogue about their past relationship is intended to be interpreted as “mean,” per the options the player is provided for response and per other character’s characterization of the relationship.) IMHO— she’s all bark and no bite. She talks a big game about needing no one, but I think she lets insecurities and fears get in the way of connection.

"What is it now?"

Hassian always enjoyed his alone time, a precious thing that was becoming more and more scarce with each new human that appeared.

So, When you first kept coming around he didn't exactly enjoy your forced company.

He told you as such, and you just... kept coming back.

Even if you didnt want to talk to him, it was easier to be with someone who was straight forward.

He didnt know this at the time, but it was because the other humans didnt enjoy your presence. You always said the wrong thing, had made a bad joke or had just seemingly broken a rule no one had ever told you.

And here Hassian was giving you pass with each social structure that you broke, telling you immediately what you did wrong and how to fix it instead of just a glare.

"Keep shining your light."

With the more you hang around Hassian, the closer you grew (even if it came reluctantly)

He realized why you chose to stick around him. With him, you didnt have to be afraid of any judgey stares (besides if you said something kind about a chapaa) or masking around a larger group.

Hassian was his own kind out anyway, being the introverted man that he is, he truly learned to appreciate your honesty of character.

Even if he didnt always understand why you were so awkward (in both demeanor and language) he was able to find joy in you not being afraid around him.

"I'm glad you're path is intertwined with mine."

Hassian had a bit of a bad-relationship streak himself, so having a friend that was as understanding and willing-to-learn as you really mad him honor your friendship.

He was so panicked about his crush on you at the start that he had decided to not do anything about it.

Up until you came up near him with that gift.

From then on he made sure to allow himself to be hypnotized by your weird characteristics, and even pick up some of your habits due to how much time he spent with you.

He'll be your defender #1 if need be, as he knows you mean no-ill-will no.

This should work on any web browser.

Use your mouse to control the head angle. Press M to toggle mouth open/close.

Don't forget to press I in order to hide your cursor and the surrounding UI elements.

It may or may not work on all sites, but worth a try.

So in the last twenty four hours, I've seen a lot of stuff about Lindsey Graham, a possible update on Mitch McConnell where he provides proof of life but is no longer capable of serving in the Senate, and a few other things of that nature. I am also under the impression that tomorrow, on Monday the 13th of July, the Senate returns after being in either recess, or something equivalent to it but formally different somehow.

What this says to me is that tomorrow is probably a good time to call your Senators and voice concerns and protests about the KIDS Act package and the legislation that went into it, including not only KOSA but the EARN IT Act and SCREEN Act. I believe the latter two were heavily influenced by Graham, and he may have even introduced one or both; we've been fighting this kind of legislation for a while and a lot has happened in that time span, so I cannot remember precisely and my notes are in considerable disarray. Whatever the case, he is no longer in a position to advocate, lobby, promote, or favor-trade for it. I do not at this time have access to information on when the Senate will be taking up any specific legislation, but the loss of one GOP Senator (possibly two) shaves their already thin majority down even further until interim appointments can be made / special elections held. Majority Leader Thune is almost certainly having to recalculate a lot of political math right now, and he was already trying to thread the needle between the president's obsession with the SAVE Act and the backlash from voters and polling.

Remember to frame your position according to what resonates with the personal and party politics of the Senator you are calling. Statistically speaking, Democrats are more likely to listen to concerns about Trump using this legislation to silence free speech, which he does more than enough of already. Republicans on the other hand are more likely to hear concerns about the economy and national security grounds, and with the whole Iran and Strait of Hormuz thing going on right now, both are VERY topical. However these are general trends, and some topics will be much more and less important to individual elected officials, so figuring out what those are in advance is a good idea.