#woah notes

On the one hand, there are the bi!Dean writers, who at this point can break down the arguments being lobbed against them into the finest rhetorical grains, into 20 nuanced cultural and logical fallacies per anti- paragraph.

But then there are the ‘Dean is a straight straight man, godammit, he said so’ people. Who, other than more adamant punctuation, basically just stick to that. 

Here is how I feel about TVGuide’s "survey”:

you load your dash. it’s about to be canon. not this episode, not the next episode, but in a few episodes. you feel lost in time. what year is this, you ask. what season.

you believe with all your heart. you don’t believe anything. maybe this is all just a dream.

the distant cries of wankers draw nearer. do their wails mean your happiness is nigh? could their tears be a sign of the times?

you long to find a casual viewer. yet you’re also repelled by them. what if they speculate endgame lisa? perhaps best not to look...

you do not ship cockles. you. do. not. dammit.

“you can’t spell subtext without text.” you write this on the chalkboard. you write this on the wall. you write this in your notebooks and in your blog and in a fan letter and in 10,000 tweets projected out into the digital void. but what is the point of communication even

will dean like cas’s scones? will cas like dean’s car? it’s all very important. bakery fics: you’ve ascended to the highest level. 

it is canon, you realize. they did it in idaho. they did it in purgatory. they did it right after purgatory. they did it in the bunker shower. they did it in dean’s room. they did it a worn down motel room. this is so obvious