yeah iāll say it i donāt like how shipping culture encourages people to draw conclusions about media theyāve never seen or taken the time to think critically about.
this is mostly but not exclusively about what iāve seen from parts of the house fandom. in the case of house, people will hear about the show because of hilson and start watching it while consuming hilson content based on the later seasons. this gives them preconceived notions of what certain āhilsonā scenes or plotlines are about before they watch them, many of which are taken wildly out of context. what this does is creates a fandom culture thatās extremely single-minded; anyone who interprets a scene differently is a ā#hilson denierā and people are quick to assume homophobia on the parts of both writers and fans.
additionally, when people go into the show expecting it to be gay, they usually come out of it with two simultaneous viewpoints: 1) that it is gay and cannot be interpreted any other way, and 2) that itās queerbaiting. neither are true. house is queer-coded and i think people who deny that should probably examine why, but that doesnāt necessarily make āhouse and wilson gayā the only correct interpretation. itās fiction. there is no correct interpretation. (i donāt feel like going into the difference between queerbaiting and queer-coding right now so for my thoughts on that see this post).
and donāt get me wrong, i love hilson! but i donāt agree with much of the fandomās portrayal of them. the gay jokes, for example, donāt āproveā anything to me except that house and wilson are friends. anyone whoās been around straight guys for more than 0.5 seconds can attest to the fact that gay jokes are a sort of.. bonding ritual. iāve seen people argue that wilsonās āthat smugness of yours is an attractive qualityā line is proof hilson is canon, even though i think itās pretty clearly sarcastic both in and out of context. and i recognize that most of the active fandomā especially on tumblrā is neurodivergent tweens who might have a harder time picking up on jokes like that. thereās nothing wrong with that! but when those misunderstandings become widespread, yeah, itās a problem. media literacy is a necessary skill to learn and recognizing sarcasm is (as tedious as it can be) a part of that.
what does suggest a queer relationship between house and wilson for me isnāt their words, itās their actions. house lies. wilson lies. itās illogical to apply that to every interaction between them except their jokes. but houseās reaction to figuring out amber was āfemale himā? house almost killing himself to save amber because wilson loved her? house wanting to choose death over wilson hating him? the direct parallel between cuddyās cancer scare (during which house relapses on vicodin) and wilsonās diagnosis (during which house gives up the last of it)? house metaphorically killing himself to have a few more months with wilson? THOSE are āhilson moments.ā
also, i think itās worth noting how tv and queer representation (or lack thereof) has changed since the early naughts when house was first airing. my mom, who is queer and was a fan of house while it was airing, doesnāt think hilson exists either textually or subtextually. i donāt agree with her, but i also come from a different generation and i view media differently.
idk. this was rambly and i didnāt get my point across like iād intended but this is my piece.
tldr: there are plenty of reasons to ship hilson outside of the showās homophobic jokes and media literacy is vital to creating a healthy fandom ecosystem. itās okay to interpret a ship differently but itās not okay to accuse writers or fans of unfounded homophobia.
disclaimer: i think shipping culture is an important part of fandom and this is not a denunciation of hilson or anyone who ships it, merely a critique of a vocal minority of fans.
further reading: this post on subtext in fandom and this post on The Hilson Jokes⢠with a focus on houseās brokeback mountain reference