Just two months after October 7, international organizations were already discussing how to apply the term âfamineâ to the situation in Gaza.
This was revealed by World Health Organization representative to Israel, Dr. Michel Thieren, on the Mosaïque podcast last week.
The podcast was created by Akadem and the French Institute of Israel, and former journalist Antoine Mercier hosted the episode.
JPost Videos
Thieren attended a multilateral governance meeting about Gaza in Geneva in December 2023. During the meeting, Thieren said organizations discussed how important it would be to scientifically demonstrate the occurrence of a famine in Gaza, and how to use the term for communication and political pressure on Israel. According to him, this was explicitly discussed at the highest levels in these meetings.
âAt the very end of the meeting â I wonât say exactly where, and it wasnât necessarily at the WHO, rest assured â there was a gathering of experts who asked the question quite forcefully. I was there, and I was absolutely stunned. What they were saying, essentially, was that one should try to find a term that could be used to exert pressure. So yes, I was very shocked by that.â
Thieren added that what shocked him the most was that, in these circles, the perpetrators and the victims were designated from the very beginning, âfrom October 8.â
âSo when these people were saying it would be necessary to demonstrate famine, the guilt had already been assigned [to Israel]. When we talk about genocide, the WHO never went there, others did â but very early, these people pronounced these two terms [genocide and famine], they were thrown out right from the start. So the crimes were already predetermined, and then the organizations tried to demonstrate them. And for me, that is not normal at all.â
Regardless of whether or not the word famine was accurate, Thieren said it was amplified âin the abyssal void of social media, and the harm was done.â
While Thieren himself didnât comment on whether a genocide had occurred in Gaza â âthe reports will come, weâll judge then" â he did note with suspicion the length and detail of reports discussing Israelâs alleged genocide.
âThere arenât 72 pages of justification," he said.
âYou know, in medicine, when we learn the treatment of a disease, if the treatment is described in 10 pages, it means there is no treatment. A treatment is three lines: you take this, it works, and it kills the disease. So the bigger the reports, the more suspicious they are.â
In the case of Rwanda, where the genocide was âself-evident,â Thieren said he read a report from an independent commission that was 24 pages long, with one paragraph on the justification of the genocide.
Narrative around Israel's actions 'biased'
The issue with the narrative around Israel and Israelâs actions is ânot only that itâs biased, but that there is often a kind of enjoyment,â he said. âThereâs a kind of... we describe, we announce, we tell the story of this war with a certain pleasure.
âAnd thatâs where, for me, all these accounts â wherever they come from â are tinged with antisemitism.â
Thieren was in Europe on the morning of October 7, 2023, but took one of the first planes to Israel when he learned of what happened. Soon after, he went to see the kibbutzim.
âFor the third time in my life, I saw what a land of massacre looks like.â
The other two times were in Srebrenica in 1995, and Kigali [in Rwanda] in 1994, he said.
âI could describe to you what a land of massacre is, but itâs that kind of landscape â very silent, echoing, muffled â as I say, frozen in a sort of Pompeii of murder. Iâve always felt that a land of massacre is not a land of war. I was in Syria: you see lands of war there. Itâs not the same thing. A land of massacre is a land of massacre.
âAnd what I saw at Beâeri and at Nova was a land of massacre â unmistakably.â
He then went to visit the morgues at Shura military base near Ramle, where the dead from the kibbutzim had been gathered and autopsied. He asked to see the bodies: âItâs because, in the same way that a land of massacre must be seen, must be listened to, must be felt. I needed to go inside, to be close to the death of Kfar Aza and Beâeri, which I had seen just a few hours earlier.
âThereâs this desire to say âyes, but thereâs context.â No, there is no context [to October 7]. There is no possible context for Hamasâs murder. It is absolutely impossible.â
It couldn't be that the UN and WHO at the highest levels held meetings to see how they could accuse Israel of famine and genocide on OCTOBER 8TH, hmmmmmmmmm? Meanwhile, Russia, North Korea, Iran, China, Afghanistan, Yemen, Sudan...........................