#villainorigin

Analysis of Kotaro Shimura’s Actions and Their Consequences in My Hero Academia

Kotaro Shimura’s actions as a father and his deep-seated resentment toward heroes, particularly his mother Nana Shimura, play a pivotal role in the creation of Tomura Shigaraki, the Big Bad of My Hero Academia. His abusive behavior, irrational hatred, and susceptibility to manipulation by All For One (AFO) not only led to the destruction of his family but also set the stage for Tomura’s transformation into a villain who nearly dooms the world. Below, I analyze the stupidity, villainous tendencies, and horrific nature of Kotaro’s actions, their consequences, and how they contributed to the catastrophic rise of Tomura Shigaraki.

Stupidity of Kotaro’s Actions

Kotaro’s decisions are marked by a profound lack of emotional intelligence, poor judgment, and failure to learn from his mistakes, which collectively contribute to his downfall and the creation of a global threat. Key instances of his stupidity include:

Failure to Understand Nana’s Sacrifice:

Kotaro’s hatred of heroes stems from his belief that his mother, Nana Shimura, abandoned him for her hero work. He was unaware that she placed him in foster care to protect him from All For One, who had already killed his father (Pages 4, 5). His refusal to seek or accept an explanation for her actions reflects a stubborn, irrational grudge that clouds his judgment. This lack of understanding fuels his abusive parenting, as he projects his trauma onto his children, particularly Tenko.

Stupidity: Kotaro’s inability to question his assumptions about Nana’s motives or seek closure demonstrates a critical failure of introspection. Had he investigated or been open to communication, he might have avoided his destructive path.

Abusive Parenting Tactics:

Kotaro’s go-to punishment for Tenko’s interest in heroes—locking him outside until he apologized—was not only cruel but also counterproductive. It alienated Tenko, fostering resentment rather than understanding (Page 2). His violent reaction to Tenko finding a photo of Nana, beating him and condemning her memory, further escalated the emotional abuse (Page 2).

Stupidity: Kotaro’s reliance on fear and punishment to control Tenko’s behavior ignored the psychological impact on a young, Quirkless child already struggling with identity. His failure to recognize Tenko’s emotional needs or provide positive guidance was a reckless parenting choice that pushed Tenko toward a breaking point.

Final Act of Violence:

When Tenko’s Decay Quirk awakens and accidentally kills the family, Kotaro’s immediate response is to attack his terrified, grieving son with a weed clipper rather than attempt to calm or reason with him (Page 3). This act of violence, driven by fear and panic, triggers Tenko’s rage, leading to Kotaro’s gruesome death and Tenko’s complete descent into villainy (Page 3).

Stupidity: Kotaro’s decision to resort to violence in a moment of crisis, despite witnessing the catastrophic power of Tenko’s Quirk, was monumentally shortsighted. A rational response—retreating, seeking help, or showing empathy—might have de-escalated the situation. Instead, his actions cemented Tenko’s transformation into Tomura Shigaraki.

Susceptibility to Manipulation:

Kotaro’s friendship with “a man from Koga Constructions” (revealed to be AFO) made him vulnerable to subtle manipulation. AFO encouraged Kotaro’s hatred of heroes and nudged him toward stricter, abusive parenting, even influencing his decision to have Tenko (Page 5). Kotaro’s failure to question this “friend’s” motives or recognize the manipulation reflects a lack of critical thinking.

Stupidity: Kotaro’s blind trust in AFO, a stranger who reinforced his worst instincts, was a critical error. His inability to see through AFO’s façade allowed the villain to orchestrate the Shimura family’s downfall.

Overall Stupidity: Kotaro’s actions are rooted in emotional blindness and a refusal to confront his trauma or seek alternative perspectives. His rigid enforcement of anti-hero rules, abusive discipline, and failure to adapt in a crisis demonstrate a lack of foresight that directly contributes to his family’s destruction and Tomura’s rise. His stupidity lies in his inability to break free from his past, communicate effectively, or prioritize his son’s well-being over his personal grudges.

Villainous Tendencies

While Kotaro is not a villain in the traditional sense, his actions exhibit villainous traits, particularly in their cruelty, selfishness, and contribution to catastrophic consequences. These traits align him as a tragic, morally compromised figure whose behavior borders on villainy:

Abusive Control and Cruelty:

Kotaro’s strict household rules, banning any mention of heroes, and his physical and emotional abuse of Tenko (locking him out, beating him) reflect a tyrannical need for control (Page 2). His attack on Tenko for finding Nana’s photo shows a willingness to harm his own child to enforce his ideology, a hallmark of villainous behavior (Page 2).

Villainous Trait: His cruelty, especially toward a vulnerable five-year-old, mirrors the callousness of villains who prioritize their own agendas over others’ well-being. His actions instill fear and trauma in Tenko, directly contributing to his son’s villainous path.

Hypocrisy and Selfishness:

Kotaro condemns heroes for “hurting their families to help strangers,” yet his abusive parenting mirrors this very behavior, prioritizing his grudge over his family’s happiness (Page 2). His wife, Nao, calls him out for this hypocrisy, noting that he’s doing to Tenko what he resented Nana for (Page 2).

Villainous Trait: His hypocritical justification of his actions and focus on his own pain over his family’s needs reflect a self-centeredness akin to villains who rationalize harm for personal gain. This selfishness blinds him to the damage he inflicts.

Manipulation by All For One:

AFO’s manipulation exacerbates Kotaro’s worst traits, encouraging his hatred and abusive tendencies (Page 5). While Kotaro is an unwitting pawn, his willingness to embrace AFO’s suggestions without questioning them shows a moral weakness that aligns with villainous susceptibility to corruption.

Villainous Trait: His role as AFO’s pawn, however unintentional, makes him complicit in the villain’s scheme to groom Tenko into Tomura Shigaraki. His failure to resist this influence contributes to the creation of a world-threatening villain.

Creating a Villain:

Kotaro’s abuse is the primary catalyst for Tenko’s transformation into Tomura Shigaraki. By fostering resentment, fear, and despair in Tenko, Kotaro sets the stage for AFO to exploit the boy’s trauma, turning him into a symbol of destruction (Page 3). Tomura’s hatred of heroes and society, culminating in his leadership of the League of Villains and Paranormal Liberation Front, directly stems from Kotaro’s actions.

Villainous Trait: Kotaro’s role as the “unwitting instigator of doom” parallels villains who inadvertently create greater threats through their actions (e.g., Endeavor’s neglect creating Dabi). His failure to nurture Tenko makes him a key architect of the series’ central conflict.

Overall Villainy: Kotaro is not a villain in the sense of actively seeking to harm society, but his abusive, controlling, and hypocritical behavior places him in a morally gray area. His actions, amplified by AFO’s manipulation, have villainous consequences, as they directly lead to the creation of Tomura Shigaraki, a villain who threatens global stability. His lack of remorse until it’s too late and his reliance on violence cement his status as a tragic, villain-like figure.

Horrible Actions and Their Consequences

Kotaro’s actions are horrific in their emotional and physical toll on his family, particularly Tenko, and their ripple effects on the world of My Hero Academia. Below are the key horrible actions and their devastating outcomes:

Emotional and Physical Abuse:

Action: Kotaro’s strict anti-hero rules, enforced through punishments like locking Tenko outside and physically beating him for finding Nana’s photo, create a household of fear and repression (Page 2). His daughter Hana’s panic and decision to blame Tenko for sneaking into his office highlight the terror Kotaro instills (Page 2).

Consequence: This abuse traumatizes Tenko, fostering a deep-seated resentment toward his father and heroes. It primes him for psychological collapse when his Decay Quirk awakens, as his emotional fragility amplifies his destructive instincts (Page 3).

Final Act of Violence:

Action: Upon discovering Tenko’s accidental killing of the family with his newly manifested Decay Quirk, Kotaro attacks him with a weed clipper, further enraging his son (Page 3). Even after expressing regret for his earlier abuse, Kotaro reverts to violence in a moment of panic, begging Tenko to stop only after striking him (Page 3).

Consequence: This final act of cruelty is the breaking point for Tenko, who intentionally kills Kotaro in a rage, marking the birth of Tomura Shigaraki (Page 3). The severed hand of Kotaro becomes a grim trophy for Tomura, symbolizing his trauma and hatred (Page 1).

Failure to Communicate:

Action: Kotaro never explains to Tenko why he hates heroes or the truth about Nana’s sacrifice, leaving Tenko confused and resentful (Page 2). His refusal to engage in open dialogue about his trauma or Tenko’s aspirations exacerbates their rift.

Consequence: This lack of communication isolates Tenko, making him vulnerable to AFO’s manipulation. AFO exploits Tenko’s loneliness and anger, grooming him into a villain who seeks to destroy hero society (Page 5).

Susceptibility to AFO’s Manipulation:

Action: Kotaro befriends AFO, unaware of his true identity, and follows his advice to be stricter and have another child (Tenko). AFO secretly gives Tenko the Decay Quirk, setting the stage for the family’s destruction (Page 5).

Consequence: Kotaro’s trust in AFO enables the villain to orchestrate Tenko’s transformation into Tomura Shigaraki. AFO’s manipulation amplifies Kotaro’s abusive tendencies, ensuring Tenko’s trauma and Quirk awakening align with AFO’s plans (Page 5).

Global Consequences:

Creation of Tomura Shigaraki: Kotaro’s abuse and final act of violence trigger Tenko’s descent into villainy, creating Tomura Shigaraki, who becomes the leader of the League of Villains and Paranormal Liberation Front. Tomura’s actions—unleashing High-End Nomu, orchestrating prison breakouts, and wielding AFO’s power—bring hero society to its knees, nearly dooming the world (Pages 7-12).

Collapse of Hero Society: Tomura’s hatred, rooted in Kotaro’s abuse, fuels his mission to destroy heroes and society. The Paranormal Liberation War and Final War result in mass casualties, the loss of public trust in heroes, and widespread destruction, all traceable to Kotaro’s failure as a parent (Pages 9-12).

AFO’s Triumph: Kotaro’s role as an unwitting pawn allows AFO to manipulate Tenko into becoming his successor and potential vessel. AFO’s near-success in controlling Tomura during the Final War threatens global domination, a direct consequence of Kotaro’s susceptibility and abusive parenting (Page 12).

Moral Weight: Kotaro’s actions are horrific because they not only destroy his family but also set off a chain reaction that endangers the world. His abuse of Tenko, driven by unresolved trauma and amplified by AFO’s manipulation, is a profound failure of responsibility. His fleeting moments of remorse (e.g., after beating Tenko, Page 2) are overshadowed by his inability to change, culminating in a final act of violence that seals his fate and Tenko’s.

How Kotaro Nearly Doomed the World

Kotaro’s actions directly contribute to Tomura Shigaraki’s rise, which nearly leads to the collapse of hero society and global catastrophe. The mechanisms by which he enables this outcome include:

Trauma as a Catalyst:

Kotaro’s abuse creates a psychologically broken Tenko, whose despair and rage are unleashed when his Decay Quirk awakens. This trauma makes Tenko receptive to AFO’s manipulation, as he has no one else to turn to after killing his family (Page 3). Without Kotaro’s abuse, Tenko might have grown up with a stable support system, potentially becoming a hero or a civilian rather than a villain.

AFO’s Manipulation:

By befriending AFO and following his advice, Kotaro becomes a pawn in the villain’s long-term plan to create a successor. AFO’s decision to give Tenko the Decay Quirk and encourage Kotaro’s abusive parenting ensures Tenko’s transformation into Tomura (Page 5). Kotaro’s failure to recognize AFO’s influence allows this plan to unfold unchecked.

Hero Hatred Legacy:

Kotaro’s irrational hatred of heroes, instilled in Tenko through abuse, becomes the foundation of Tomura’s ideology. Tomura’s mission to destroy hero society mirrors Kotaro’s belief that heroes harm their families for strangers, but on a catastrophic scale (Page 2). This ideology drives Tomura’s actions, from the U.S.J. attack to the Final War, threatening global stability (Pages 7-12).

The Chain of Harm:

Kotaro’s trauma from Nana’s abandonment leads to his abuse of Tenko, which in turn creates Tomura, who perpetuates destruction on a massive scale. This chain of harm illustrates how Kotaro’s unresolved pain ripples outward, amplifying suffering and chaos (Page 2).

Near-Dooming of the World:

Tomura’s leadership of the League and Paranormal Liberation Front, empowered by AFO, results in devastating attacks that weaken hero society, including the destruction of cities and the release of countless villains (Pages 9-10). His acquisition of the All For One Quirk and his role in the Final War bring the world to the brink of collapse, with AFO nearly achieving total control through Tomura’s body (Page 12).

Only the intervention of heroes like Izuku Midoriya, who reaches Tenko’s vestige and helps him resist AFO, prevents complete catastrophe (Page 11). Kotaro’s actions set this chain in motion, making him indirectly responsible for the near-apocalypse.

Comparison to Other Characters

Kotaro’s actions can be compared to other flawed parents in My Hero Academia, particularly Endeavor, to highlight their similarities and differences:

Similarities with Endeavor:

Both are abusive parents whose actions create villains (Kotaro → Tomura; Endeavor → Dabi).

Both are driven by personal issues (Kotaro’s abandonment trauma; Endeavor’s obsession with surpassing All Might).

Both contribute to societal harm through their children’s villainy, though Kotaro’s impact is more catastrophic due to Tomura’s scale of destruction.

Differences:

Endeavor is a hero who eventually seeks atonement, reforming his behavior and aiding in the fight against Tomura (Page 2). Kotaro dies without redemption, his fleeting remorse overshadowed by his final violent act (Page 3).

Endeavor’s abuse stems from ambition, while Kotaro’s is rooted in trauma and hatred, making Kotaro’s actions more emotionally driven but less excusable given his lack of external pressure (e.g., no societal role like Endeavor’s hero status).

Endeavor gives his children some autonomy (except Shoto), while Kotaro’s controlling rules stifle his family entirely (Page 2).

Mitigating Factors and Sympathy

While Kotaro’s actions are undeniably horrific, certain factors provide context, though they do not excuse him:

Trauma from Abandonment: Kotaro’s hatred stems from being orphaned by Nana’s decision to protect him from AFO. His lack of knowledge about her true motives fuels his resentment, making him a tragic figure (Page 4).

Manipulation by AFO: AFO’s subtle encouragement of Kotaro’s worst instincts amplifies his abusive behavior, suggesting he might not have been as cruel without this influence (Page 5). However, Kotaro’s choice to act on these suggestions remains his responsibility.

Fleeting Remorse: Kotaro’s moments of regret (e.g., after beating Tenko) indicate he is not entirely heartless, but his failure to act on this remorse undermines any sympathy (Page 2).

Despite these factors, Kotaro’s actions remain indefensible. His abuse of Tenko, especially in the face of his son’s vulnerability, and his failure to seek help or change his behavior make him a hate sink with little reader sympathy (Page 2).

Conclusion

Price Drop:

Raptoraem: The Drowned Star (Book I) is available now for $9.99 — a limited-time pre-order price (regular $12).

This is my thank-you to those who’ve stood with me since the beginning, and to everyone stepping into Raptoraem for the first time.

📚 Exclusive Pre-Order Price: $9.99 (regular $12)

Available now on Amazon Kindle.

Direct shop editions will launch at full price with bonus extras.

Pre-order today to lock in the launch discount before release.

👉 Raptoraem on KDP

⚔️ RAPTORÆM: THE SAGA (Book I) ⚔️

A dark epic of rebellion, forbidden magic, and villain origins.

Analysis of Tenko Shimura's Family: Stupidity, Consequences, Sympathy, and How They Nearly Doomed the Planet

Tenko Shimura's family—consisting of his father Kotaro Shimura, mother Nao Shimura (née Magi), sister Hana Shimura, and maternal grandparents Chizuo and Mako Magi—forms the tragic backdrop for Tenko's transformation into Tomura Shigaraki, the central antagonist of My Hero Academia. While Kotaro is the primary instigator of the family's dysfunction, the others contribute through passivity, fear, or misguided actions. Their collective failures, amplified by All For One's (AFO) manipulation, not only destroy their household but also set off a chain reaction that nearly annihilates hero society and the world. Below, I analyze the family's stupidity (poor judgment and irrational decisions), consequences (immediate and long-term fallout), sympathy (mitigating factors for their behavior), and their role in nearly dooming the planet. This draws from canon details, focusing on their dynamics with Tenko.

Stupidity of the Family's Actions

The Shimura family's decisions are characterized by emotional shortsightedness, denial, and a failure to intervene in Kotaro's escalating abuse. While Kotaro's actions are the most overtly stupid, the others' inaction compounds the tragedy.

Kotaro Shimura (Father): Kotaro's hatred of heroes, rooted in his misunderstood abandonment by his mother Nana Shimura, leads to irrational household rules banning hero discussions. His abusive punishments—like locking Tenko outside or beating him for finding Nana's photo—stem from projecting his trauma without seeking therapy or context. Befriending AFO (disguised as a colleague) and following his advice to be stricter, even having Tenko as a second child, shows blind trust in a manipulator. His final stupid act: attacking a Quirk-rampaging Tenko with a weed clipper instead of de-escalating, despite witnessing the destruction.

Stupidity Core: Kotaro's refusal to introspect or communicate, prioritizing his grudge over family well-being, is profoundly irrational. He ignores clear signs of Tenko's distress, assuming fear-based control would work.

Nao Shimura (Mother): Nao's passivity is her key flaw. She witnesses Kotaro's abuse but only mildly protests, like saying "Stop, Kotaro! Don't be so hard on him!" without escalating to divorce or intervention. She enables the toxic environment by not challenging Kotaro sooner, despite recognizing the hypocrisy in his hero hatred mirroring Nana's "abandonment."

Stupidity Core: Nao's meekness and failure to act decisively, even implying she'd take the kids but never following through, reflects a lack of foresight. She underestimates the long-term damage of inaction.

Chizuo and Mako Magi (Grandparents): The maternal grandparents dote on Tenko superficially—cheering him up with small gestures—but never confront Kotaro's abuse head-on. They live in the household yet remain passive observers, offering no real protection.

Stupidity Core: Their inaction, perhaps due to dependency on Kotaro, shows a failure to prioritize Tenko's safety. Simple interventions like reporting abuse or removing him could have changed everything.

Collective Family Stupidity: The family's enabling of Kotaro's rules through fear or denial creates a pressure cooker. No one seeks external help (e.g., heroes or counseling), and their stupidity lies in normalizing abuse under the guise of "family unity." This irrational dynamic ignores Tenko's obvious suffering, assuming it would resolve itself.

Consequences of Their Actions

The family's failures have devastating immediate and ripple effects, culminating in Tenko's villainous turn and global threats.

Immediate Family Destruction: Kotaro's abuse triggers Tenko's Decay Quirk awakening, accidentally killing the dog, Hana, the grandparents, and Nao. Kotaro's final attack seals his own death. The family dies gruesomely, with Tenko left traumatized and alone.

Nao's failed cooldown hug and Hana's flight highlight how their inaction leads to panic in crisis.

Grandparents' passivity means they die without aiding Tenko.

Tenko's Transformation: The abuse fosters Tenko's resentment, making him vulnerable to AFO's grooming. Kotaro's hands become Tomura's trophies, symbolizing trauma. Without family support, Tenko embraces villainy, leading the League of Villains.

Broader Societal Impact: Tomura's actions—U.S.J. attack, Overhaul alliance, Paranormal Liberation War—cause mass deaths, hero retirements, and societal collapse. The Final War nearly ends the world, with Tomura as AFO's vessel wielding god-like power.

Legacy of Harm: The family's hypocrisy (condemning heroes while harming their own) becomes Tomura's ideology, fueling his destruction. AFO's manipulation succeeds because of their enabling, turning Tenko into a symbol of broken families.

Sympathy for the Family

Despite their flaws, the Shimuras evoke sympathy as victims of generational trauma and manipulation, humanizing their failures.

Kotaro Shimura: As Nana's son, Kotaro was abandoned for his safety from AFO, but without explanation, it scarred him deeply. He kept Nana's letter and photo as tragic keepsakes, showing unresolved pain. His brief regrets after abusing Tenko and attempts to be better (e.g., resolving to make amends) suggest internal conflict. Sympathy stems from his troubled upbringing and AFO's exploitation—he's a troubled abuser, not a pure monster.

Nao Shimura: Nao is a loving mother trapped in an abusive marriage, doting on her children but too weak-willed to escape. Her final act—trying to hug a rampaging Tenko—shows genuine care. As the "token good teammate," her sympathy lies in her victimhood; she stands up too late, but her intent to defect and protect the kids evokes pity.

Hana Shimura: As a child, Hana's betrayal is fear-driven, not malicious—she's terrified of Kotaro's wrath. She supports Tenko's dreams secretly and tries to apologize, showing sibling love. Her young age and identical appearance to Nana add tragic irony; she's an unwitting pawn in AFO's scheme to create Tenko.

Chizuo and Mako Magi: Elderly and dependent, they offer what comfort they can to Tenko, like cheering him up. Their sympathy comes from powerlessness in Kotaro's household—confronting him risks ejection. They're doting but ineffective, victims of the family dynamic.

Collective Sympathy: The family is manipulated by AFO, who encourages Kotaro's abuse and engineers Tenko's birth/Quirk. Their actions stem from fear, unresolved trauma, and societal pressures (e.g., hero worship's dark side). They're not villains but flawed humans whose mistakes have outsized consequences, making their doom poignant.

How They Nearly Doomed the Entire Planet

The Shimura family's dysfunction is the linchpin in AFO's plan to create a successor, nearly leading to global catastrophe through Tomura Shigaraki.

Catalyst for Tomura's Creation: Kotaro's abuse and the family's enabling create Tenko's breaking point. Without this trauma, Tenko's Decay (gifted by AFO) might not manifest destructively. The family's deaths leave Tenko isolated, perfect for AFO's grooming into a hate-fueled villain.

AFO's Manipulation Amplified: AFO befriends Kotaro, pushing stricter parenting and Tenko's conception. The family's failure to question this "friend" or intervene allows AFO to steal Hana's potential Quirk factor subtly and orchestrate the massacre. Sympathetically, they're unwitting pawns, but their stupidity enables it.

Ideological Legacy: Kotaro's hero hatred, echoed in the family's compliance, becomes Tomura's worldview: heroes abandon families for strangers. This drives Tomura's assaults, from Nomu releases to the Paranormal Liberation Front's war, eroding hero society and causing worldwide chaos.

Global Near-Doom: Tomura's rise leads to the Final War, where he/AFO nearly conquers Japan and beyond, with powers threatening planetary destruction. Heroes like Deku barely avert it, but the family's chain of harm—abuse to isolation to villainy—brings the world to the brink. If Tenko had a supportive family, AFO's plan fails, averting wars, deaths, and collapse.

In this alternate "what if" scenario, let's assume Tomura Shigaraki survives the Final War—perhaps by narrowly escaping death after a brutal clash with Deku, or even "winning" in a twisted sense by shattering hero society enough to create a world of chaos where quirks like his aren't vilified but embraced as tools of revolution. The heroes are scattered, All For One's influence lingers in Tomura's fragmented mind, and Japan is a fractured landscape of ruins and opportunistic villains. Now, onto how he might cross paths with young Koki Terumoto and take him under his wing in a dark mentorship. I'll weave this as a narrative outline, staying true to the characters' essences while exploring the mentor-apprentice dynamic.

The Encounter

Shortly after Koki's quirk manifests in his family's living room—that ominous dark sludge spreading like an inescapable void, swallowing furniture and leaving his relatives in horrified awe—the Terumoto family reacts with the same fear and cruelty as in canon. The elder demands his death or imprisonment, labeling him a "freak variant" that could tarnish their reputation. But in this timeline, the family doesn't get the chance to fully enact their plan. The Final War's chaos spills into civilian life earlier; riots and quirk-fueled skirmishes turn neighborhoods into battlegrounds.

As the family debates Koki's fate in their basement, a massive decay wave from a distant villain clash (orchestrated by Tomura's forces) crumbles part of their home. The structure collapses, killing most of the Terumotos in the debris. Young Koki, barely five or six, survives by instinctually unleashing more of his Darkness quirk—creating a protective sinkhole that engulfs the falling rubble around him, though it leaves him trapped and terrified in a pocket of shadow.

Tomura, scavenging the ruins for resources or potential recruits amid his survival, senses the anomaly. His own quirk, Decay, resonates with the destructive essence of Koki's power; it's like a echo of erasure, but inverted—where Tomura disintegrates, Koki engulfs and hides away. Drawn by curiosity (and perhaps a subconscious recognition of his own abused childhood under All For One), Tomura decays his way into the wreckage. He finds the boy huddled in a cocoon of writhing black sludge, eyes wide with fear, mouth already bruised from his family's initial attempts to silence him.

"You're not broken," Tomura rasps, his voice a gravelly whisper through his scarred lips. He doesn't touch the boy at first—too risky with his quirk—but extends a gloved hand, pulling him free. Koki, starved for any kindness, doesn't resist. Tomura sees a mirror of his past self: a child discarded for a power society deems monstrous. In his mind, this isn't pity; it's opportunity. "The world hates us because we're the ones who can end it. Come with me, kid. I'll show you how to make it pay."

The Mentorship Begins

Tomura doesn't "adopt" Koki in a nurturing sense—his version of mentorship is raw, survivalist, and ideological. They hole up in abandoned League safehouses, moving constantly to evade remnant heroes like Deku or Hawks. Tomura, still healing from his wounds (maybe with vestiges of All For One's quirks aiding regeneration), treats Koki as a protégé rather than a son. It's a twisted echo of how All For One molded him, but with Tomura's personal vendetta against hero society infused in every lesson.

Quirk Training: Tomura pushes Koki to master Darkness without mercy. Early sessions are brutal: "Don't hold back. Let it consume." Koki learns to shape the sludge into tendrils for grabbing enemies, pits for trapping foes, or even veils for stealth. Tomura demonstrates synergy—using Decay to weaken structures, then having Koki's Darkness swallow the remains whole. Drawbacks emerge: overusing Darkness drains Koki's stamina, causing the sludge to backfire and "sink" parts of his own body temporarily, leading to numbness or temporary paralysis. Tomura teaches him control through pain, echoing his own upbringing: "Pain means you're alive. Use it." By age 10, Koki can cover entire city blocks in shadow, creating "void zones" where heroes vanish without a trace.

Ideology Indoctrination: Tomura fills Koki's head with anti-hero rhetoric. "Your family threw you away because you weren't 'normal.' Heroes do the same to everyone who doesn't fit their pretty world." He shares stories of his own abuse (as Tenko Shimura), forging a bond through shared trauma. Koki, who in canon grows bitter at the world's joy while he suffered, here channels that rage earlier. Tomura molds it into purpose: "We're not villains. We're the reset button." Koki idolizes him, calling him "Sensei" in quiet moments, though Tomura brushes it off with a smirk.

Daily Life and Bonds: It's not all darkness. Tomura, in rare softer moments (influenced by lingering memories of the League), teaches practical skills—scavenging food, hacking basic tech (with Spinner's old gear), or even playing crude video games on salvaged consoles to "strategize." Koki becomes Tomura's shadow, literally and figuratively, using his quirk to hide them during raids. Over years, a dysfunctional loyalty forms; Koki sees Tomura as the father figure he never had, while Tomura views him as a weapon and successor. If the League remnants (like Dabi or Toga) survive, they form a ragtag "family"—Toga doting on Koki like a little brother, Dabi teaching him fire synergy with Darkness for smokescreens.

Long-Term Outcomes

Eight years post-war (aligning with canon's timeskip), this world is no utopia. Tomura's "victory" means fragmented territories ruled by quirk overlords, with heroes operating underground. Koki, now a teenager, is a formidable villain-in-training:

Strength: His quirk evolves under Tomura's guidance. He can now "store" objects or people in pocket dimensions within the sludge, retrieving them later (a la Kurogiri's Warp Gate, but void-based). Combined with Tomura's tactics, he's a nightmare for resistance fighters—sinking entire squads into oblivion.

Conflicts: Koki grapples with morality. Encounters with survivors (like that old housewife from canon) plant seeds of doubt: "Why destroy everything when some people are kind?" Tomura quashes it: "Kindness is a lie. They only help when it's easy." This could lead to internal strife—perhaps Koki betrays Tomura one day, or they clash in a mentor-vs-apprentice showdown, echoing Tomura's own rebellion against All For One.

Epilogue Tie-In: If we twist canon's epilogue, Koki doesn't end up at U.A. Instead, he infiltrates it as a mole under Tomura's orders, posing as a reformed quirk user. There, he meets Kota or Deku (now a teacher), creating tension between his indoctrinated villainy and glimpses of heroism. Or, in a darker end, Koki helps Tomura launch a final assault, using Darkness to engulf U.A. entirely.

Analysis of All For One’s Mother in My Hero Academia

All For One’s mother, an unnamed homeless prostitute introduced in a single chapter of My Hero Academia (Chapter 193), is a pivotal yet fleeting figure whose brief existence profoundly shapes the series’ central antagonist, All For One (AFO), and his brother, Yoichi Shigaraki. Despite her minimal screen time, her circumstances—poverty, illness, and the manifestation of one of the earliest Quirks—set the stage for the twins’ upbringing in a chaotic, Quirk-emergent Japan. Her death during childbirth leaves a void that influences AFO’s worldview and actions, making her a Minor Major Character whose legacy reverberates through the series. Below is a comprehensive analysis of her role, impact, and the consequences of her life and death.

Overview

Debut: Chapter 193 (Manga)

Quirk: Unnamed Wart Quirk (manifests hard warts on her skin, possibly a rudimentary Quirk)

Appearance: A gaunt, malnourished woman with long, wavy hair, resembling Yoichi’s features. She is depicted holding a beer bottle, emphasizing her destitute state.

Personality: Little is known about her personality due to her brief appearance. Her implied alcoholism and reliance on prostitution suggest a life of desperation, shaped by societal neglect and poverty.

Background: A homeless prostitute living in Japan a year before the birth of the Luminescent Baby, the first recorded Quirk user. Her declining health, exacerbated by hard warts on her skin (later revealed as an early Quirk), and her pregnancy with twins All For One and Yoichi Shigaraki define her tragic existence.

Role and Actions

Manifestation of an Early Quirk: Unbeknownst to her, the hard warts on her skin are one of the earliest Quirks in history, emerging during a time when Quirks were not yet understood. This makes her a pioneer of the Quirk era, though she never recognizes it due to her poverty and isolation.

Pregnancy and Death: Pregnant with twins (likely from different fathers, given their differing appearances), she dies giving birth to All For One and Yoichi by a riverbank. Her death leaves the twins orphaned in a hostile, Quirk-emergent society, forcing them to fend for themselves.

The Alcoholic: Her sole depiction shows her holding a beer bottle while pregnant, implying alcoholism. This detail underscores her despair and inability to cope with her circumstances, potentially affecting the twins’ early development.

The Oldest Profession: As a prostitute, she likely turned to sex work to survive, a choice born of necessity in a society that offered her no support. This suggests that AFO and Yoichi’s differing appearances stem from different fathers, adding complexity to their origins.

Narrative Significance

Minor Major Character: Despite appearing in only one chapter, her existence is foundational to the series’ central conflict. Her death and the twins’ subsequent abandonment shape AFO’s ruthless worldview and Yoichi’s compassion, setting the stage for their ideological clash as All For One and One For All’s first inheritor.

Strong Family Resemblance: Yoichi inherits her long, wavy hair and delicate facial structure, visually tying him to her. AFO, conversely, lacks this resemblance, possibly reflecting his different paternity or his rejection of vulnerability associated with her image.

Quirk Legacy: Her Wart Quirk, though rudimentary, is the first Quirk AFO steals to ensure his and Yoichi’s survival. This act marks the beginning of AFO’s Quirk-stealing spree, as he uses her Quirk to dominate others in a lawless era. Her Quirk’s simplicity contrasts with the complexity of AFO’s later abilities, highlighting the evolutionary leap of Quirks in the series.

Societal Context: Her life as a homeless prostitute reflects the societal unrest of early Quirk-era Japan, where those without power or resources were marginalized. Her death by childbirth underscores the lack of support for the vulnerable, a theme echoed in MHA’s exploration of societal prejudice (e.g., against the Quirkless or Mutant Quirk users).

Impact and Consequences

Shaping All For One’s Worldview: AFO’s mother’s death leaves the twins to survive alone in a chaotic world, fostering AFO’s distrust of others and belief that only power ensures survival. Her absence teaches him that those who cannot benefit him are disposable, a philosophy that defines his villainy. His act of stealing her Wart Quirk to protect himself and Yoichi marks his first step toward becoming a Diabolical Mastermind, prioritizing power over morality.

Yoichi’s Contrasting Path: Yoichi, inheriting her frail appearance, likely draws compassion from their shared vulnerability. His rejection of AFO’s ruthlessness and embrace of heroism (via One For All) can be seen as an attempt to honor the fragility their mother represented, contrasting AFO’s rejection of weakness.

Origin of the AFO-Yoichi Conflict: The twins’ orphaned state, caused by their mother’s death, forces them to rely on each other, but their differing responses to her absence—AFO’s power-hungry nihilism vs. Yoichi’s empathy—ignite the ideological battle between All For One and One For All. Her death is thus the catalyst for the series’ central conflict, as the twins’ paths diverge in her absence.

Quirk Evolution and AFO’s Rise: Her Wart Quirk, stolen by AFO, symbolizes the dawn of the Quirk era and AFO’s role as its dark pioneer. By taking her Quirk, AFO begins his campaign of domination, using stolen abilities to amass power. This act prefigures his creation of the Nomu and manipulation of society, as seen in My Hero Academia: Vigilantes with the Villain Factory.

Tragic Absence: Her death leaves a void that neither twin can fill. For AFO, it fuels his need for control, as seen in his manipulation of others (e.g., Shigaraki, Number 6). For Yoichi, it inspires a desire to protect, leading to One For All’s creation. Her absence is a ghostly presence, shaping their actions and the series’ narrative.

Connections to Broader MHA Universe

Parallels to Eri’s Parents: Like Eri’s father, AFO’s mother is defined by absence, her death leaving her children vulnerable to exploitation. Her unwitting manifestation of a Quirk mirrors Eri’s accidental erasure of her father, highlighting the destructive potential of early Quirks. Unlike Eri’s mother, who abandons her child, AFO’s mother has no choice, but both leave their children to suffer, underscoring MHA’s theme of familial failure.

Villain Factory and Nomu: AFO’s theft of his mother’s Quirk parallels the Villain Factory’s experiments in Vigilantes, where Quirks are manipulated to create monstrous villains. Her Wart Quirk, as an early prototype, foreshadows the Nomu’s creation by Kyudai Garaki, AFO’s ally, tying her to the series’ bioengineering narrative.

Societal Collapse: Her life as a prostitute in a pre-Quirk society reflects the chaos of MHA’s early Quirk era, similar to the societal unrest in Vigilantes. Her marginalization prefigures the prejudice against Quirkless individuals or those with “undesirable” Quirks, a theme central to Midoriya’s journey.

Moral Duality: The twins’ contrasting responses to their mother’s death mirror MHA’s exploration of moral duality (e.g., Midoriya vs. Shigaraki). AFO’s mother, as the origin of both a villain and a hero, embodies this duality, her legacy split between destruction and salvation.

Speculation: What If She Had Lived?

Impact on AFO and Yoichi: Had she survived, AFO’s mother might have provided stability, potentially tempering AFO’s ruthless ambition. Her presence could have fostered a nurturing environment, reducing AFO’s need to dominate others for survival. Yoichi’s compassion might have been reinforced, but his creation of One For All might not have occurred without AFO’s villainy as a catalyst.

Quirk Recognition: If she had lived to recognize her Wart Quirk, she could have taught AFO and Yoichi about Quirk ethics, altering AFO’s path from stealing Quirks to understanding their societal impact. This might have delayed or prevented AFO’s rise as a villain.

Societal Role: As an early Quirk user, she could have become a figurehead in the Quirk era, either as a symbol of empowerment or a target of prejudice. Her survival might have shifted the narrative focus to her struggles as a pioneer, rather than her sons’ conflict.

Legacy: Her death ensures her role as a tragic catalyst. If alive, her influence might have softened the twins’ story, but her absence is narratively necessary to drive AFO’s villainy and Yoichi’s heroism, making her death integral to MHA’s core conflict.

Conclusion

⚡ STORY TIME ⚡ He was no ordinary villain… 😈 The Celestial could bend time ⏳, erase memories 🧠, and control entire kingdoms 👑 with a single thought 💭.

But what happens when power meets destiny? 🌌 When a man who ruled the stars begins to question his own existence... ✨