#upanishad

The Aitareya Upanisad opens with a simple yet radical statement. Before the universe, before time, before elements— there was Atman (Consciousness) alone.

Creation did not begin with matter. It began with awareness. This shifts the entire way we look at existence-from accidental to intentional.

In the beginning, the Self alone existed.

Nothing else whatsoever was there.

— Aitareya Upanisad 1.1.1

****************************

Creation Did Not Come from Nothing

Modern thinking often says the universe came out of nothing. The Upanisad says something different: Existence came from Existence itself.

Consciousness did not appear inside the universe. The universe appeared within consciousness.

He thought: 'Let me create the worlds.'

— Aitareya Upanisad 1.1.1(context)

****************************

Creation Begins with Intention, Not Chance

The Upanisad uses the word “Icchitt” (He saw / He willed). This is not physical seeing. It indicates intelligent intention. Creation is portrayed as a deliberate unfolding, not a mechanical accident.

He created these worlds.

— Aitareya Upanisad 1.1.1

****************************

Multiple Worlds, One Conscious Source

The Upanisad describes the creation of multiple realms-not as separate realities, but as expressions of the same conscious source.

Diversity does not mean division. Multiplicity does not cancel unity.

He created the worlds-water, light, mortal realm, and the cosmic waters.

— Aitareya Upanisad 1.1.2

****************************

Why Create at All?

The Upanisad does not say creation happened due to lack. It was not because the Self was incomplete.

Creation is described as expression, not necessity— like light radiating from the sun.

He reflected: 'Who will sustain and inhabit these worlds?'

— Aitareya Upanisad 1.1.3

****************************

Consciousness Wants to Experience Itself

The Upanisad introduces a profound idea: creation exists so consciousness can experience itself. Worlds are created, but without a conscious knower, creation would remain incomplete.

He created the human being.

— Aitareya Upanisad 1.1.3

****************************

Among all forms, the human being is special

- not because of strength or intelligence, but because of self-awareness. Humans alone can ask: Who am I? Why am I here?

He infused consciousness into the human form.

— Aitareya Upanisad 1.1.4

****************************

Creation Is Not Separate from You

The Upanisad quietly removes distance between creator, creation, and you. The same consciousness that created the universe is what looks through your eyes right now. You are not a byproduct of creation. You are its living expression.

That alone is the Self.

The Shvetashvatara Upanishad

"Conscious spirit and unconscious matter

Both have existed since the dawn of time,

With maya appearing to connect them,

By https://wellcomeimages.org/indexplus/obf_images/01/64/805ea5d825de7673594bd1fea9ec.jpg CC-BY-4.0, CC BY 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=36016141

Indian philosophy is the oldest known philosophy as it was written in the Vedas around 900 BCE, 'religious texts that form the foundation of much of Indian philosophy', especially the Upanishads, which 'discuss profound philosophical topics' and also includes non-Vedic movements such as Buddhism and Jainism. Within the Upanishads, Upaniṣad, concepts such as Atman, Ātman, and Brahman are introduced, with Atman meaning the 'eternal soul that constitutes the essence of every conscious being' and Brahman meaning 'the ultimate reality and highest principle governing the universe', and exploring the relationship between the two and a 'key idea being that understanding their connection is a crucial step on the spiritual path toward liberation'.

Some of the Upanishads say that an ascetic lifestyle, or 'abstinence from worldly pleasures through self-discipline, self-imposed poverty and simple living', while others 'emphasize active engagement with the world, rooted in the belief that individuals have social duties to their families and communities' as a way to reach the understanding of how Atman and Brahman are related. The duties a person has in live are 'prescribed by the concept of dharma, which varies according to one's social class and stage of life', with dharma being a complex and multilayered concept that relates to 'order and custom which makes life and the universe possible and thus to the behaviours appropriate to the maintenance of that order'. Reincarnation, or the rebirth of individual souls, emerged during this time, indicating that a 'person's actions in previous lives determine their circumstances in future lives, a principle known as the law of karma'.

Around the 6th century BCE, Buddhism and Jainism emerged, which were in conversation with the Vedic tradition. Gautama Siddhartha, who lived from 563-483 BCE and later became known as Buddha, 'challenged the Vedic concept of Atman by arguing that there is no permanent, stable self' and that the 'belief in a permanent self leads to suffering and that liberation and can be attained by realizing the absence of a permanent self'. That liberation is known as nirvāṇa while the source of human suffering is known as duḥkha and the process of learning the wisdom, 'to withdraw the mind from the automatic responses to sense-impressions and "burn up" the defilements' is known as dhyāna and involves 'training of the mind' bhāvanā, often thought of as meditation. He advocated for a 'Middle Way', majjhimāpaṭipadā, between asceticism and hedonism, or bodily sensual indulgence, because 'a malnourished body did not allow the mind to be trained and developed'.

Mahavira, who lived from 599-527 BCE, was the founder of Jainism, focused on 'respect for all forms of life, a principle expressed in its commitment to non-violence' also known as ahimsa, which 'prohibits harming or killing any living being, whether in action or thought'. The second pillar of Jainism is anekāntavāda, or non-absolutism, which holds that 'no single, specific statement can describe the nature of existence and the absolute truth…statements about absolute truth are incomplete, and at best a partial truth…[and] must be qualified in many ways, including being affirmed and denied'. The third pillar is asceticism, or non-possession aparigraha, which includes 'detaching oneself from worldly possessions and desires to avoid emotional entanglement with them'. This non-possession allows 'all consumption is more appropriate if it is essential to one's survival, and inappropriate if it is a form of hoarding, showing off, or for ego'.

Kazahiku Fukuoji

* * * *