How Game Of Thrones Should Have Ended
I have no idea why I am doing this. The thoughts just came into my mind and I decided to write them down. Anyway, letâs lay out the scenario I have decided to go with.
Everything is the same as GOT show canon until after the Long Night. After that is when I am going to meddle, but I am keeping some things from the final three episodes, like Daenerys burning Kingâs Landing and Jon killing her. Bite me, Dany stans.
Weâre going to go kingdom to kingdom here, starting from beyond the Wall and descending southwards. Letâs go!
This stays mostly the same, if Iâm honest. I actually really liked Jon returning to the Wall and beyond. It was where he seemed happiest. But in my ending Jon and the Watch/Wildlings regularly trade with the North and Jon is allowed to visit Winterfell whenever he wants.
Weâre sticking with Sansa as Queen of the North and Northern Independence here. But Arya and Bran stay in the North. Not necessarily in Winterfell- maybe Bran goes to Greywater Watch with Meera? And Arya gets her own keep, Bear Island? Dreadfort? Karhold? Last Hearth? There are many she could choose from.
I know the topic of Sansa and marriage is a controversial one, but realistically either she or Arya is going to have to marry someone. Thereâs going to need to be more little Starks eventually and Iâm not sure Bran can father any children, so it will have to be either Sansa or Arya.
Iâm 50/50 on whether Sansa should marry again. On the one hand, she has so much marriage related trauma that she probably doesnât want to marry again. On the other hand, I think it would be nice if she got a chance for a loving husband. Not sure who said loving husband would be. A Northern man, though.
A Glover? Or Tallhart? Cerwyn? Manderly? The showâs never explicit on who among the Northern noble houses died or even exists in show canon, so I donât know who is and is not alive.
The Iron Islands should be an independent kingdom. There is no reason for Yara to just agree to be ruled by Bran. Though, she was stupid enough to think Daenerys would allow her (Yara) to rule the Iron Islands independently, even though she (Daenerys) proclaimed herself the Queen of the Seven Kingdoms every other second. Maybe Yaraâs just stupid. She is Theonâs sister, after all.
(I joke. I love Theon, heâs one of my favourite characters.)
But, yes, Yara should be Queen of the Iron Isles.
While I think the North, Iron Isles and Dorne should all be independent, I donât think the Vale, Riverlands, Westerlands, Stormlands, Reach and Crownlands should be independent.
They all worship the same religion and have roughly the same culture, unlike the North (different religion and culture), Iron Isles (different religion and culture) and Dorne (same religion* but different culture).
So Robin Arryn, obviously, is the Lord of the Vale with the assistance of Lord Yohn Royce, who was nowhere near badass enough in the show. We were robbed of Badass Bronze Yohn.
âŚI donât really have much more to say here. I could discuss who Robin should marry, but thatâs far more speculative and headcanon-y than I want to get here. Let me know if you want me to write a GOT/ASOIAF ships essay.
*Iâve always thought it was odd that the Rhoynar didnât seem to bring their religion to Dorne? They brought and kept their system of rulership but no religion? Odd.
I donât have a whole lot to say about the Riverlands. Edmure is their lord. Theyâre not independent.
I do have one thought about what Iâd want the Riverlands to do: border defences! The Riverlands donât have mountains or the Neck or any other natural border defences, but after being used as a battleground over and over again they can, and should, build manmade defences. Have watchtowers every so often along the borders. Build a big fence. Something!
The big question for the Westerlands is who is the Lord? Jaime, in my ideal ending, went back to kill Cersei, not save her, and died while doing so, fully redeeming himself in death. All of their children are both bastards and dead, and Kevan and his sons are all dead too.
I canât remember if the show includes the existence of Tywinâs sister Genna and her offspring, but if they did theyâre likely all dead too as they were Freys and, well, winter came for them.
So the only living Lannister of the main branch is Tyrion. Who murdered the last lord and betrayed all of the kingdoms by advising Daenerys during her conquest attempt. I do not think he should be awarded for that.
Who, then? Some distant Lannister cousin, I suppose. If memory serves me correctly, the show does mention Stafford Lannister, if only in talking about his death in battle against Robb. Stafford has a son, Daven, who seems like a cool dudebro type guy. Let him be lord. It would be fun.
Here is where it gets interesting. Iâve said I think that most of the kingdoms should stay under the rulership of one King, but not who that king should be. Well, here it is, step forward King Gendry of House Baratheon, First of That Name.
As there are no legitimate Baratheons left and Gendry is the last of Robertâs bastards left (except maybe Mya and Bella, whom if memory serves the show ignores. Again, we were robbed of Mya, at least. Though Bella seems cool.), he is the rightful heir to the Iron Throne, not any Targaryens.
This does throw into question his legitimisation- if Daenerys was never truly queen and didnât have any right to the throne, does her legitimisation of him actually count?- I suspect most people would be willing to ignore that.
Anyways, if Gendry is King, who is the lord of the Stormlands? I have no idea. One of Robertâs other bastards? The guy had like seventeen of them, there must be others out there somewhere? Or maybe someone like Davos or one of the more trusted lords- Selwyn Tarth? An Estermont?- is lord regent until Gendryâs second son is of age? But that would be close to twenty years, assuming Gendry marries and begins producing offspring pretty quickly and manages to produce two sons straight away.
This one is easy. I canât remember if thereâs even a passing mention of them in the show, but regardless we know that at least one of Mace Tyrellâs two older sons must exist in the showverse. Otherwise he wouldnât allow Loras to join the Kingsguard.
So Willas Tyrell, Maceâs eldest son, is Lord of the Reach.
In the show, for unfathomable reasons, they choose to have a random Martell cousin show up at the council deciding who the next king is. Now, there is a Martell cousin in the books, Manfrey Martell, but heâs described as ancient and dude in the show clearly is not. So Iâm not sure if thatâs meant to be him or a different random cousin the show pulled out of its arse.
Iâm sure that at some point the show made reference to Oberyn having eight daughters, so the youngest five Sand Snakes (Sarella, Elia, Obella, Dorea and Loreza) do exist in the show.
I donât know if a male legitimate cousin comes before a female illegitimate niece in Dorne. They donât do male first primogeniture and are more lax about bastards, but does that mean a bastard would inherit over a trueborn?
An Aside About the Unsullied and Dothraki
I liked the showâs ending for Grey Worm. Sailing off to protect Missandeiâs birthplace? Lovely. But what about the Dothraki? The show just sort of forgets about them, as I recall. And surely not all of the Unsullied want to go to Naath.
Here is where I get quite Daenerys critical, so be forewarned.
Daenerys took quite a lot of the Dothrakiâs warriors with her. I assume not all- surely there are khalasars that donât follow her- but if memory serves sheâs got most of them. Even if these Dothraki manage to make it back to the Dothraki Sea- and thatâs a long sea voyage and an overland trek without the protection of a âqueenâ and her dragons- whatâs going to be left for them?
We never see any Dothraki women or children in Westeros. Daenerys clearly left them behind. Did she leave any warriors to protect them? Will any returning Dothraki be able to reunite with wives and children or have they all been taken by other khalasars?
So no families left. I doubt other khalasars are going to be willing to accept Dothraki who left their homeland to follow the woman who burned down their sacred temple into their khalasars.
All in all, there doesnât seem to be much point in these Dothraki returning to Essos. So what to do with them in Westeros?
Ditto for the Unsullied. Theyâve got no reason to return to Essos either. They were slaves there and I doubt Daenerysâ no slavery (except for herself and her advisor) policy lasted long after she left.
Daario likely fucked off back to a sellsword company or was overthrown and killed as soon as the dragons were gone, letâs be real.
Now there are lots of areas depopulated after the wars. Many parts of the North and Riverlands donât have noble houses and probably donât have many peasants either. Maybe the Dothraki and the Unsullied could set up shop there.
But while the Unsullied might be content to live in one place, the nomadic Dothraki arenât. So what to do when they inevitably want to roam?
It doesnât help that the show is confusing as hell about how many Unsullied and Dothraki there are after the Long Night then again after Daenerysâ burning of Kingâs Landing.
I have no solution here. Something to think on.
I really donât know why I wrote this. I started off thinking I had solid ideas for all of the kingdoms, but I really didnât. But this was fun. Let me know what you think!