Many of those attending the worldâs largest meeting on womenâs rights in New York this week are primed to defend the two key UN agencies tha
Isabel Choat at The Guardian:
Thousands of international delegates are gathering in New York this week for the worldâs largest meeting on womenâs rights. The United Nationâs annual Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) is an opportunity for government ministers, UN officials, NGO representatives and activists to discuss the global state of gender equality and womenâs empowerment. This year, there will be a strong focus on âensuring and strengthening access to justiceâ. But as senior UN figures urge countries to intensify their efforts to achieve gender equality, many of the delegates will be asking whether the UN is at risk of diluting its own commitment to women and girls. The question centres on a plan to merge UN Women, the agency dedicated to gender equality and womenâs empowerment, with the UNâs sexual and reproductive health agency, the UNFPA. The aim of the merger is to improve efficiency, strengthen impact, reduce duplication and create a single body for governments and partners to work with. But since it was first proposed last year as part of UN80 â an initiative to reform the entire organisation â voices expressing concern over the idea have grown louder and more urgent. Womenâs rights groups and a significant number of member states fear that restructuring the two agencies at a time of multiple global crises, plummeting levels of aid and a fierce rollback of rights is a high-risk strategy.
âDangerous climateâ
Jessica Stern, co-president of the Alliance for Diplomacy and Justice, which advocates for human rights in US foreign policy, said: âThese two agencies have been working in a resource-depleted environment for a very long time; they are not perfect and not the only solutions to achieving gender equality and ensuring people have access to reproductive rights, but they are what we have now. âAnd in the current climate,â she added, âwhen there is a violent and effective backlash, anything that destabilises the scant resources we have is dangerous.â Critics of the plan argue that creating a single organisation would almost certainly reduce funding from donor countries, with severe and lasting consequences for the worldâs most vulnerable women and girls.
Gita Sen, co-founder of the feminist network Dawn, said: âIn todayâs climate, if you tell a funder that you are merging they will think âso how much will I save?â, so the risk is you will end up with less money, and God knows the amount of money now is totally inadequate â itâs a drop in the ocean in terms of whatâs needed.â Stern added: âPeople around the world depend on UNFPA and UN Women programmes to counter sexual violence, domestic abuse, for accountability for marital rape and so-called âcorrective rapeâ, for âhonourâ killings. They depend on them for access to birth control and sex education. These agencies fight some of the most egregious forms of violence.â
The fate of two key womenâs rightâs organizations within the UN umbrella-- UN Women and UNFPA-- could be decided this week in New York.















