Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
โ Live Streamingโ Interactive Chatโ Private Showsโ HD Qualityโ Free Actions
Free to watch โข No registration required โข HD streaming
I hate the endogenics are radqueers arguments because they just show such a misunderstanding of what each community is as well as why radqueers are problematic in the first place.
Endogenics are not claiming to have a disorder due to their plurality(except in cases where they have trauma they typically fully remember to back up actually needing treatment). It is focused on non-disordered experiences of feeling like you are more than one regardless of autonomy of parts. This includes things like parts work, code switching/masking, delusions and a natural lack of stagnancy of identity that comes with other identities or disorders. If it makes you feel like you are more than one and benifits you to identify as such its plural(a term coined explicitly to be pro-endo). It is regularly a theraputic coping mechanism for adverse experiences as the majority of endogenics have significant trauma(many significant childhood trauma) alongside multiple disorders(regularly developmental and/or trauma based) that they report and makes day to day life naturally more difficult for them.
And willogenics specifically? Are actually the least like other created plurality types as it developed as a practice in the plural community instead of the singlet one. It is more often used to create headmates in already existing systems over creating plurality from scratch. Its also commonly used for traumagenic parts such as with elaborating fragments or aiding in difficult traumagenic splits. Yes one can be both traumagenic and willogenic at the same time without it contradicting one another. When you go "I wish x could exist to help me cope with this trauma"(whether consciously or subconsciously) and an alter that is x forms to deal with said trauma that falls under willomancy per the community definition(doesn't not mean you have to see or identify yourself as such with how common an experience this is just that some with that experience will identify it as willogenic as it benefits them to do so and fits the definition).
Now radqueers... We need to acknowledge that there is a distinct difference between what radqueers would label as radqueer experiences and THE radqueer community. Because the community 100% is harmful and breeds potentially dangerous situations but the experiences being described themselves are regularly normal trauma responses that have been demonized outside of the community. I don't touch the radqueer community but of the few transDID folks I've met all of them are OSDD-1 systems who have atypical dysphoria and feel less valid due to the community treating DID as the more valid disorder. TransTrauma? Is commonly those who don't feel like their trauma is enough(usually again because it has been invalidated) to justify the trauma response they experience. Demonizing these experiences when many join that community due to having their normal experiences demonized only exacerbates the problem. Using their experiences to demonize others who have a completely different experience exacerbates the problem.
Endogenics are those claiming to have a non-disordered experience, and not wanting a disorder, of feeling like they are more than one for reasons other than their trauma. TransAbled folks feel like they should have a disorder due to atypical dysphoria which they may or may not attempt to transition into having to alleviate dysphoria(no transitioning into having a disorder you don't is not ok but experiencing atypical dysphoria should be more accepted with how common it is in trauma survivors). They aren't the same thing.
HORRIBLE community to be in by the way, like ignoring just the concept and identities, the community itself is so unbelievably toxic <- was actively groomed into it, then got groomed a second time inside of it
and being in the endo community instead again is a blessing
but I jusr thought of the best comment on pro-contact zoophilia <- has always been anti-contact even when deep in that community
and I'm frothing at the mouth that I have no where to rant about it at
Radqueers are an amalgamation of multiple different and often concerning pro-stances being forced into being somehow "queer." (using the recent times meaning of it, which being not peri-cishet-allo etc etc) No one is radqueer unless they themselves call themself that. You can support certain things they support, but the difference is that they have no limits on when its too supportive.
sometimes I think about becoming a dark shipper or radqueer just for the negative attention, even secretly so someone would make like a document on me because I'm lying about being an anti shipper or anti radqueer but that's Sort Of Bullshit because both of those communities genuinely make me sick I Could Never
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
โ Live Streamingโ Interactive Chatโ Private Showsโ HD Qualityโ Free Actions
Free to watch โข No registration required โข HD streaming
One thing that frustrates me about "Transcultural" radqueers is that they keep reinforcing this idea that only people who can pass a blood quantum test are "really" members of a culture. Radqueers claim to radically believe anyone is whatever they claim to be, but if you look at who they lump in as "Transcultural" often immigrants, people born and raised into a country their parents weren't born into, people who have connections with a culture due to having non-direct but still massively influential in their upbringing family from that culture, etc..
For example, a person who immigrates to Russia, who is born into Russia but has Icelandic parents, or who is raised by their Russian aunts within the context of Russian culture are not "Transcultural", their connections to that culture are real and inherent to them, so for Radqueers to include them in the category of "Transcultural", it is implicitly stating that the only way to be "CisID" for a culture is to be able to pass a blood quantum test.
Of course, I suspect this rhetoric is being spread by radqueers who just want to make themselves more legitimate. If the quirky white American girl trying to be Korean because she likes Kpop can lump in enough legitimate experiences in with her racist bullshit then she thinks that'll make her seem more valid, when really all it does is invalidate other people's genuine cultural ties.
So much of transID's are seriously trying to get the racists to feel valid. We've seen folks trying to claim unless you can be blood-tied to a culture then you aren't actually part of it when it's like....no??
We're 1/4 German. We don't have ties to the German culture, so won't say that we're German. Despite having a blood-tie to it. There's no sort of "cisID" to that
Culture is something completely different then what radqueers realize. So much of it is seriously just trying to give the "quirky" racist white person an excuse to say slurs (for example, we've seen "transrace" black folks use it to say the n-word) and seem cool and unique
Radqueers being stupid and not reading the description of a coining which is literally nothing like their fuckass pedophilic bullshit
omfg, this is why I had to recoin paradreamer on my alt, because y'all cannot understand that paradreamers and paraphiles are EXTREMELY different. Thank you for the person who rebloged it being actually observant, they might be a radqueer but at least they understand that paradreamer is not the same as an anti contact para.
I have more ranting and explaining under the cut but for the low attention span people: Para = sexual/romatic attraction. Paradreamer = internalized glorification due to trauma/grooming which causes demonization and fixations.
I can understand how some can get paras and paradreamer mixed up but they're not the same. A para is a strictly romatic/sexual attraction to something not inherently romatic/sexual while paradreamer is a glorified idealogy to something problematic that may cause rised aggression towards the paradreamic source. Paradreamer is a label made to warn people of someone's possible aggression and fixations on certain harmful communities.
The whole concept of paradreamer is to warn people of possible aggression and how someone may act that way because of trauma or mass grooming. I can understand maybe finding the name of paradreamer or it's alt versions (necrodreamer, zoodreamer, etc) weird but hating on the label paradreamer itself is just so stupid to me, why would someone be mad that they're getting a warning.
Paradreamers aren't paraphiles. Y'all made me have to rewrite the entire description for the label because the description didn't walk you through the difference.
I might rewrite some of this rant later because as of writing this I am tired, pissed off, and to lazy to check for bad grammer.
