#tradesecrets

The tech world was rocked Friday when Apple filed a bombshell lawsuit against OpenAI, accusing the AI powerhouse of a coordinated campaign to steal its intellectual property to build competing hardware. What was once a promising partnership is now a full-blown legal war.

👉Visit For Updates

My expectations going into this book were hopeful but low, and lemme tell you, I was taken by total surprise by how much I thoroughly enjoyed this book! I devoured @bettsican’s words, finishing the book in two days and I can’t wait for the sequels.

Trade Secrets is if Carry On (minus the magic) met 1984 and punched it in the face, then followed it up with a kiss. 

Switching back and forth between the years 2079 and 2080, the novel tells the tale of Nate Donovan’s struggle with an oppressive government that provide paradise to the rich and squalor to the poor. To make matter worse and more convoluted, currency has shifted from money to truths and secrets. Then Nate meets Cooper Hall, a young man he was never supposed to know, and the truths Cooper unwittingly shares bring Nate into the government’s biggest conspiracy.

Nate Donovan is a bisexual chaotic disaster whose narration is both poetic and gritty. He has a distinct voice that gives Trade Secrets its particular brand of sarcastic noir brilliance. The cast of characters who surround Nate hold their own; they’re the most strong, smart, layered, genuine dumbasses you’ll ever meet. Cooper Hall only wants to disappear, but there’s nothing like a handsome know-it-all to ruin your life. Audrey can smell bullshit from a mile away and it usually leads her back to Nate. Ivonne and Joshua King aren’t always what they seem...neither is the rest of the King clan.

I could go on about the different excellent uses of craft and words, but I think your time would better spent reading Trade Secrets, so go do that.

so here's a fun fact that's actually a masterclass in business strategy:

Coca-Cola has been around since 1886. it absolutely could have patented its formula back then. it chose not to. and that one decision is why, almost 140 years later, basically nobody knows the real recipe.

let's talk about why.

patents have an expiry date. secrets don't.

a patent sounds powerful — you get exclusive rights to your invention. but here's the catch:

it only lasts ~20 years

to get it, you have to PUBLICLY DISCLOSE exactly how the thing works

so if Coca-Cola had patented the formula, by like 1906 the whole world would've had the recipe on file, legally. and anyone could copy it once the patent ran out.

a trade secret? no filing. no disclosure. no expiry. as long as you keep it confidential and take it seriously, it's protected forever.

that's why the formula is locked in a vault and split among a handful of people who each only know part of it. iconic, and also just. smart legal strategy.

the 2006 Coke vs Pepsi drama

ok this part is wild. in 2006, two Coca-Cola employees tried to steal confidential info + an actual sample of an unreleased product, planning to sell it to Pepsi.

Pepsi said no. and told Coca-Cola AND the FBI.

it turned into a real criminal case. moral of the story: trade secrets aren't just "vibes" — they're legally enforceable, and courts take misappropriation seriously.

wait, what actually counts as a "trade secret"?

more than you'd think. it's not just chemical formulas. it can be:

a manufacturing process

your customer/supplier list

pricing formulas

an algorithm

a recipe or blend

literally any confidential info that gives you a competitive edge

if you run a restaurant, a textile business, a small manufacturing unit, or a startup — you probably already have a trade secret. you just haven't thought of it that way.

the legal test (for my India followers 👀)

India doesn't have a dedicated Trade Secrets law (yet). but under the TRIPS Agreement (which India is bound to as a WTO member), something counts as a trade secret if it passes this 3-part test:

it's actually secret — not common knowledge

it has value because it's secret

you've taken reasonable steps to protect it

Indian courts apply this even without a specific statute — through contract law, confidentiality principles, and injunctions.

two cases worth knowing:

John Richard Brady vs Chemical Process Equipment — early case that protected confidential technical info shared in a business relationship

Navigators Logistics vs Kashif Qureshi — more recent, dealing with employees misusing confidential info after leaving a company

both basically say: yes, Indian courts will step in to protect your confidential business info, even without a dedicated law.

why doesn't India have a trade secrets law already??

good question. India signed onto TRIPS back in 1995 but still hasn't passed dedicated legislation. right now protection comes from a patchwork:

NDAs / confidentiality clauses

Indian Contract Act provisions

common law "breach of confidence" principles

some IT Act / IPC provisions

it works, but it means YOU have to be proactive. the law isn't going to protect information you never bothered to treat as confidential.

ok so what do i actually do about this

quick checklist:

✅ figure out what confidential info actually gives your business its edge ✅ restrict who has access (need-to-know basis) ✅ get NDAs signed — employees, vendors, everyone ✅ document how you protect this stuff (courts want proof of "reasonable steps") ✅ have a plan for when employees with sensitive access leave

Coca-Cola isn't just a fun trivia story. it's proof that "keep it secret, keep it safe" is a legit, court-backed business strategy — and it's available to literally any business, not just soft drink giants.

Apple Sues OpenAI

Apple is taking legal action against OpenAI, alleging the theft of trade secrets 📈💻. This development may have significant implications for the tech industry and the future of artificial intelligence. What do you think will be the outcome of this lawsuit and how will it impact the industry?

🚨 Major Trade Secrets Case Back in the Spotlight 🚨

A U.S. appeals court has revived $82.2 million of a verdict against Ford in a major dispute involving trade secrets and software licensing with Versata Software.

The Federal Circuit ruled that the jury had calculated breach-of-contract damages with “reasonable certainty,” restoring a large portion of the original $104.6 million verdict.

📌 What the case is about: • Software licensing agreements • Trade secret misappropriation • Automotive collaboration technology • Intellectual property enforcement

Versata alleged that Ford copied its automotive software after years of licensing the technology for global vehicle collaboration and design operations.

⚖️ Why this matters: As industries become more software-driven, companies are facing growing legal and financial risks tied to: ✔️ Proprietary software ✔️ Licensing compliance ✔️ Trade secret protection ✔️ IP strategy and enforcement

This case highlights how valuable intellectual property has become in the automotive and technology sectors.

📌 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐭 𝐈𝐏 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐆𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐩 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐚 𝐅𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐈𝐏 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐠𝐮𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞:

Gideon Korrell Explores Anti-SLAPP Protection in the IQE v. Newport Fab Ruling