would it be reductive of me to ignore the elephant in the room (the disappointing gender-essentialism in making it so that the female-led version of the dance is less "aggressive" than its male counterpart) and instead focus on the mouse in the room (the inherent queerness in women cross-dressing to participate in a male-dominated performance, but not in blind imitation of them, but instead to flirt with each other)? if so, call me pest control because













