I think the fact that my essay on the effects of bullying and what perpetuates it was based almost entirely on analyses of Snape shows that I need to get my life in order.
I mean, not necessarily. The reality is that when someone experiences violence at every level —both privately, at home, and publicly, in environments like school —and they become so cornered by that violence that the only visible escape route ends up being an extremist organisation, whether political, religious, criminal or otherwise, that is something that happens constantly in real life. That’s literally how these organisations function. Vulnerable teenagers are their prime targets.
Take religious cults, for example. A huge number of members are people born into them, obviously, because they were raised in that environment from childhood. But when cults recruit outsiders, they overwhelmingly target very young people — especially teenagers—baecause teenagers are easier to manipulate, easier to emotionally isolate, easier to make promises to. These groups identify unmet emotional needs and unresolved wounds and then present themselves as the solution.
And this is incredibly common with people who’ve experienced addiction, abuse or social abandonment. Someone spends years struggling, their family rejects them, society stigmatises them, and suddenly a group appears offering community, acceptance, structure, purpose, support and belonging. That’s how recruitment works. It is not random. So when people completely ignore the role that bullying, abuse and social isolation played in Snape making terrible decisions, I honestly think they’re ignoring the most realistic part of his character.
Of course there are exceptions. Of course some people survive horrific circumstances and never get radicalised or manipulated into destructive environments. But socially and politically speaking, exceptions are not what we should be focusing on. And this is where I think fandom discourse becomes deeply neoliberal in the worst possible way. Because people immediately jump to this individualistic mindset of: “Well, this other person went through trauma and didn’t become radicalised, so Snape had no excuse.” Okay. And That proves absolutely nothing about systemic violence.
If one person survives a broken system through sheer luck, resilience or circumstance, that does not mean the system itself works. It does not erase the structural conditions producing harm in the first place. The problem is not solved because one person out of a hundred managed to escape it. The goal should never be “find the exceptional individual who overcame the odds.” The goal should be creating systems where the other ninety-nine people don’t fall into those situations to begin with. That’s how you analyse social problems politically and sociologically: by looking at the forest, not obsessing over the single surviving tree.
And honestly, I think a huge part of this mindset comes from USAmerican cultural influence dominating online spaces. Because USAmerican discourse around social issues is extremely individualistic. It’s all “personal responsibility,” “mindset,” “choices,” “if I could do it, anyone can.” And I’m sorry, but that is not how human beings work. Not everyone has the same psychological resilience. Not everyone processes trauma the same way. Not everyone has the same emotional resources, neurological wiring, support systems or survival mechanisms.
And I say this as someone who considers herself a strong person. I’ve survived things that could have destroyed me. But I have also seen people who went through less than I did fall into addiction, self-destruction, abusive relationships or psychological collapse. And I would never look at those people and arrogantly say, “Well, I survived, so you should have too.” Because that’s not empathy. That’s ego. The issue is systemic violence, not individual moral purity.
And honestly? Considering everything Snape went through —chronic abuse, social isolation, war, manipulation, radicalisation, trauma, guilt, emotional repression and the fact that nobody ever got that man into therapy a single day in his life— the fact he functions at all in his thirties is kind of impressive. Because I know people in their thirties who went through far less and are doing three times worse.

















