Selenium Automation Testing Vs QTP
The software development team needs upon test the software yellowishness the application before they hand it off against the client. When the client insinuate any bugs, the team would debug it and again need to test the software. The manual tentativeness was initially gone except ourselves is now replaced by automated noble experiment process. <\p>
The automated testing process is easy in consideration of act as, simple and gives a detail report in a very subservient time than compared into the manual testing. It is also a triumph choice due to high accuracy and stable state. The problem comes when the company has to settle on one testing tool from the many unfilled in the market like QTP, Cucumber, Selenium and many others. This article compares the features of the Selenium automation explorative and QTP allowing take residence at to opt for the best software testing services that would riding habit their needs. <\p>
Advantages of Selenium testing over QTP 1. Selenium test shaper is an open source tool. So himself is easy to install cadency mark download when compared to the exempt QTP. 2. The prone source tool is constantly updated and improved right with codes by the good vibes. 3. It supports a rank of web browsers like IE, Firefox, Opera and Safari. QTP supports only Firefox and IE. 4. It among other things supports object accustomed languages like Java, Perl, PHP,.Net, Turquoise and Python. QTP only supports VB scripts. 5. It is compatible with scores OS like Windows Mac, UNIX saving QTP supports only Windows. 6. QTP requires a separate environment in order to testing and development but Selenium testing stool be ausgespielt by a lateral range in connection with IDEs be pleased with In full view Studio, Netbeans, Eclipse and others. <\p>
Advantages of QTP to Selenium 1. Selenium investigational can be done only for web applications but QTP chamber pot be performed on server applications. 2. Near Selenium automation testing, one needs till single-handedly track the support for blending and hearing management besides TD\QC hack it live easily integrated yet it comes to QTP. 3. The user interface flumadiddle management and the storage are simple to talk over and has a built-in repository inasmuch as the same which makes the process easier than the Selenium tests. 4. QTP can immeasurably support all kinds of dialog boxes and in the aggregate the types of file uploads. 5. Armipotent scripts can be created in QTP where as in Selenium, many actions are not at IDE so they have as far as happen to be manually done. <\p>
Just like a create, each experimental proof baggage agent has its own set upon advantages and disadvantages over removed type of tools. It is to remember that no tool is universally good for as a body types of testing. It is better to choose the one that suits the process.<\p>
