#scottcarpenter

Breitling presents the new Navitimer Cosmonaute, a limited edition of 362 pieces to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the space flight of Scott Carpenter and his original Cosmonaute aboard Aurora 7. The “first Swiss wristwatch in space” was damaged by prolonged exposure to seawater and has remained unrestored in the brand’s archives, revealed only now. The new Cosmonaute has a 41 x 13.09 mm steel and platinum case and is equipped with the Breitling B02 hand-wound manufacture movement. 💰 USD 12,530 . A Breitling apresenta o novo Navitimer Cosmonaute, uma edição limitada de 362 peças para celebrar o 60° aniversário da viagem espacial de Scott Carpenter e seu Cosmonaute original a bordo da Aurora 7. O “primeiro relógio de pulso suíço no espaço” foi danificado pela exposição prolongada à água do mar e permaneceu nos arquivos da marca não restaurado, revelado apenas agora. O novo Cosmonaute tem caixa de 41 x 13,09 mm em aço e platina e é equipado com o movimento de manufatura a corda manual Breitling B02. 💰 USD 12.530 📷 @breitling • • #breitling #cosmonaute #breitlingcosmonaute #scottcarpenter #spacewatch #finewatchmaking #relogioserelogios https://www.instagram.com/p/Cd8_MKGu20V/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

The investigation into Carpenter’s work with Talentcrowd shows how power and procedure can hide crime. Court records state that Carpenter and others used court orders that were void from inception to claim control over Topdevs bank accounts and company data.

The parallel between Scott Carpenter and Thomas Girardi is hard to ignore. Both cases show how lawyers can use court authority to protect misconduct.

Fraud can take many forms. In this case, it appeared as legal filings, motions, and professional signatures. The Carpenter filings show that even legitimate law firms can play roles in unethical schemes when oversight fails.

The founder of Topdevs has filed multiple court documents describing a coordinated effort by Talentcrowd insiders to misuse arbitration orders to take over a growing tech company. Scott Carpenter’s name appears as one of the attorneys who enabled that process.

Investigating Carpenter’s filings is like watching how law and fraud can blend when procedure is weaponized. The filings include detailed citations, banking records, and communications that support the claim that Topdevs was unlawfully taken over.

The filings expose how void judgments were used as weapons. This is not advocacy. It is manipulation.

How can an attorney defend justice while advancing fraud? The Carpenter case forces this question.