Meghan and Harry are having major meltdowns in Montecito, psychotic. The press should have more integrity than to publish Sussex lies about a Ravec case that is curently under review, but the reporter in question is none other than the propagandist, Charlotte Griffiths.
"Ravec has the final say on security and they don't have to accept the RMB security assessment. Ravec also has "executive authority" which means the government can't interfere with their decisions even though the Home Secretary is legally accountable for them."
Meghan, Harry & Griffiths Blackmail Ravec & Charles
The Harkles play pretend that a FAVORABLE judgment was handed down last month (December) while the Home Office and Palaces were on holiday. Their goal is to pressure King Charles into demanding that RAVEC make an exception for his traitorous darling boy. If they make an exception for Sparry, they must extend the same offer to Andrew, Anne, and Edward.
According to Griffiths, "Ravec's risk management board members have now decided that the Duke does meet the threshold for protection. Ravec now has little choice but to approve his request." [There's no such proof.]
Meghan, Harry & Charlotte Griffiths have deliberately lied about Ravec's forthcoming decision. They are manipulating Ravec by bullying King Charles: "The only thing that could scupper his approval now would be an intervention from the Palace. A source close to the Sussexes said, we aren't taking anything for granted. Obviously given that he is the king's son it is the right thing to do, but it's about everyone being able to save face and the risk management board is the common-sense way to do that."
SMM Anon A:
"We, the UK tax payers pay money to the Sovereign Grants that in simple terms pays for the pomp and ceremony of the Royals. We, the tax payers pay money on top of that, to pay the security costs of the royals, along with others itās deemed necessary. We, the tax payers get nothing back from Harry or his wife. We actually get disruption. Harry and his wife purposely work to try and outshine and draw attention away from those we pay taxes for. By funding Harry we are paying even more out than we would get back, why would we do this to ourselves."-SMM Anon
SMM Anon B: Please write to all departments home office, palace, ravec all emails and letters please please. Sample Letter:
Home Office
Direct Communications Unit
2 Marsham Street
London
SW1P 4DF
United Kingdom
Dear RAVEC:
I am writing to express my sincere request that you deny Harry another round of security theatrics during your review. While I appreciate that the Prince has recently described himself as being a target by "virtue of his birth". I must point out that the muchāpublicised āstalkerā incident, appears to involve a devoted fan of his. Yes, clearly it is someone with an IQ level below average (and with rather questionable taste) I grant you that, but not one who is dangerous.
As a taxpayer, I am more than willing to contribute to essential services. I am less inclined to subsidise VIP anxiety management, for a misplaced sense of pride and "whataboutism." Furthermore, I recall the Princeās own behaviour during a previous trip to London. You may recall he was wandering the city in search of friendsā homes. He was unaccompanied, unbothered, and unafraid. This does not strike me as a man who believes he is moments away from being ambushed by dark forces. It strikes me as someone in desperate need of Google Maps.
Should Harry wish to continue his casual wandering around London, may I suggest he is given: A smartphone, a functioning GPS app and if he insists on company, perhaps that one fan I mentioned earlier. She already seems eager to follow him and does so voluntarily. A win-win for the taxpayer then. Aforementioned taxpayer.
Kind Regards,
Name
Harry's BESPOKE Security: Provided upon request with 30 days notice.
At present he must inform the Metropolitan Police 30 days before arriving in the country in order to apply for a security review, which is carried out on a case-by-case basis. His lawyers have argued that his āmanifestly inferiorā security has put his life āat stakeā
Harry never lost his taxpayer funded security. Harry doesn't want to share plans in advance.
Harry never had 24/7 armed security, there is nothing to reinstate
Harry rejected the King's secured (tax payer funded) royal lodging during his visits to London in favor of expensive suites at various hotels. He shares the locations of the hotels with the press. He also announces his itinerary and his PR invited strangers and media to stand outside at various venues.
Harry & Meghan's Request: Armed taxpayer funded security (includes motorcades)
In May Harry complained to the high courts that he is unsafe in the United Kingdom. He then proceeded to answer the Deliveroo driver who dropped off his takeaway at the private home of Lord Charles Vivian, an Ā£8 million London townhouse
Harry chose to travel with his wife to three (3) dangerous countries: Nigeria, Jamaica, Colombia. He traveled alone to Ukraine and South Africa.
Privileges identical to the King and the King's Heir
Taxpayer funded security
Half in & Half out royal status (ultimate goal)
International HRH privileges to do whatever they want, whenever they want without notice or itineraries (ultimate goal)
Charlotte Griffiths: "The Duke of Sussex has won his fight for armed police protection when he visits the UK, it has been claimed. Armed security has been assured after a fresh risk assessment was carried out for Ravec. It's now a formality. Sources at the Home Office have indicated that security is now nailed on for Harry. The royal and VIP executive committee (Ravec) is said to have determined that Prince Harry meets the threshold for official protection and a ruling in the duke's favour is expected to be announced within weeks."
Victoria Ward: "The Duke of Sussex is said to be hopeful that his taxpayer funded security provision will soon be reinstated. Prince Harrry was last month granted the full risk assessment for which he had fought for years following a major U-turn by the Home Office. Sources now say that the mood music is positive, and are cautiously optimistic that his right to full armed protection will be reinstated. However, such is the ongoing distrust between the two sides that there remains concern that the Government department could yet intervene and block developments."
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
ā Live Streamingā Interactive Chatā Private Showsā HD Qualityā Free Actions
Free to watch ā¢ No registration required ā¢ HD streaming
Top Posts Tagged with #sample protest letter | Tumlook
