Hey quick question, if you're anti-pollution then how can you support cleaning? Reds are more likely than any other caste to commit pollution violations, and they admit that cleaning doesn't give them morality. If we let them into society, they might pollute it and we wouldn't even know.
By nature, Amenta is blighted by three primary pollutants: garbage, the waste of Amentans, and corpses. The horrible crime of our ancestors added another that has now been present through most of history: reds.
In cleaning, we have the opportunity to redeem our ancestorsā crime andĀ completely and foreverĀ eliminate a primary pollutant off Amenta, as well as eliminate the permanent pollution ofĀ tens ofĀ millionsĀ across Amenta, the physical (and constantly polluted) red districts, and so on.
This is an invention ofĀ enormous good and progress and a primary moral imperative of our generation is to see it used and done with all deliberate speed and thoroughness.Ā
Studies show that, controlling for theĀ significantly and obviously effect-having factorĀ of being permanent pollution sources, reds are not more likely to commit pollution violations. In fact, reds are clearly selected and trained for great care against pollution violations - if reds were careless with pollution it would beĀ unconscionable and impossible for society to trust them with the jobs they do and have done for generations, and a red who is seen committing even anĀ inadvertent pollution violation, failing to mark unavoidable pollution, failing to take all necessary precautions, and so in, is and has been highly likely to die.
In any case, individual pollution violations are the (vital and important!) business of law enforcement, and proper habits around pollution are the (vital and important!) business of education. MoralityĀ is the business of child-rearing, social institutions, and education, and personal to each Amentan for themselves past that point, and law is the business of law.Ā If there is a need to monitor to prevent pollution violations then of course this monitoring should be thoroughly carried out and this is also of great and serious importance.
If someone volitionally commits pollution violations they should be executed; if someone otherwise is in danger of committing them they should be monitored and given appropriate therapy. This is of course essential and may not be compromised on.
But to say that we shouldnāt support cleaning because some ex-reds might commit pollution violations is like saying that we should not seek to prevent destructive wars because some people who would have died in the war might commit a murder. It is short-sighted and perverse.
Pollution violations are horrible and society must be vigilant and unsparing to guard against them, but it cannotĀ and does not compare with the constant and ongoing existence of hereditarily polluted reds and the institutions thereof.