Tip for authors with a novel to submit to publishers:
Pay attention to what's on the first page of their website.
Are you immediately welcomed as a writer?
That's not always a good sign.
It might be that the press is new and still building its list of authors, so it has more to say about submissions than about the books it's published. That's not awful, but not awesome either (you may prefer to wait and let them make their beginner's mistakes on someone else's book. If the publisher finds its footing, you can always submit to them in a year or two!). Or maybe they just recently opened a new call to submissions and have that prominently announced. That's fine, but also look at when and where they post about new book releases.
A publisher should have a website that appeals to readers - with descriptions of the kinds of books they do or will publish, and ways for readers to connect like a newsletter signup option and social media links. If they have already published books: how easily can readers buy them? What do the covers look like? Do the book descriptions have any obvious typos? Do multiple books or pages on the website have errors?
No matter how proud a publisher is of how they serve authors, the main job of a publisher is to get books into reader's hands. That shouldn't be an afterthought on the website. If it takes you a few clicks to find submission guidelines, that may be a good sign. If, along the way, you spot several books to add to your to-read list, that's a great sign.
If the website seems to be downright screaming "Please let us publish you!" watch out for a catch. They might not be a vanity press, but they could be. Search "[Publisher name] scam" or "[Publisher name] legitimate" or "[Publisher name] vanity" and see what comes up. Or the business might be completely legit, just with a poorly organized website. Suggesting they're not great at selling books. Still not a good sign.
Always check the Amazon listing (and other listings) of the books from a publisher you're considering. What do the reviews say? What are the sales ranks like? What formats are the books offered in, and at what price point? Do you like the covers? Do you like how the sample is formatted, and can you spot any errors in the editing or formatting?
It's better to be unpublished than badly published. Don't get your rights tied up in a contract with a shady or ineffective publisher.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
âś“ Live Streamingâś“ Interactive Chatâś“ Private Showsâś“ HD Qualityâś“ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Taking the “Fan” Out of “Fanfiction”: A Framework for Filing Off the Serial Numbers
A guest post by @mindfulwrath.
So you want to take your story from Fanfiction to Original Fiction, but you don’t know how. Fear not! For I have experience doing exactly this. I can’t guarantee my methods will work for you, but this breakdown of my process will hopefully give you a framework for a couple of ways it could be done.
This is split into two versions: “easy mode,” for when you’re simply filing off the serial numbers, and “hard mode,” for when you’re stripping the story down to its bones in order to build it back stronger (and completely divorced from its fanfiction origins).
Disclaimer: this is not a guide on how to publish your story once it has undergone its metamorphosis. That’s a whole different beast and, in my opinion, a significantly greater challenge.
EASY MODE
Determine whether the story is amenable to un-fanfication. Alternate Universe stories are prime candidates, while stories that entwine deeply with canon have poor prospects. These two things are not mutually exclusive. One good rule of thumb is: If someone with no knowledge of the source material picked up this story, would it still make sense to them?
If the story can be disentangled from its origins, come up with replacements for character names, place names, vocabulary that’s canon-distinctive…anything that could get you sued. This may include shifting character genders/ethnicities/abilities/etc. Execute a “Find and Replace” in the original story (you probably want to save as a new document, so you can keep the original fanfic version for posterity).
Reread the story with the replacements in place. Neaten up any glaring goofs.
With the changes in place, check for and remove any harmful tropes, especially if you’ve shifted the gender/ethnicity/ability of any character (but even if you haven’t, because issues like these can carry over from the source material). Not all stereotypes have to be (or can be) completely avoided, but you should know what you need to counterbalance or address in the text. Some tropes, though, really should be avoided at all costs. If you have the means, it’s helpful to engage the services of one or more sensitivity readers/diversity editors.
Send to one or more beta readers. Ask them if they can they tell you, off the top of their head, what this used to be a fanfic of (don’t be afraid of a “yes”; getting “caught” doesn’t necessarily mean you have to go back to the drawing board, but it is important for you to know how distinct your story is. Better to find out from a beta reader than a lawyer).
Revise based on feedback. May require multiple rounds.
Make your final line edits, and start thinking about where you want to publish it!
HARD MODE
Begin the same as you would for Easy Mode: determine if the story is un-fic-able and, if so, file off the serial numbers, check for harmful tropes (potentially with assistance from a sensitivity reader/diversity editor), and give it a quick once-over for Find-and-Replace goofs.
Close the document and shelve it for 3–12 months. No, really. You have to make time to fall out of love with it, or the rest of this won’t work.
Re-open the “Easy Mode” story. Read through it again, taking careful notes about the main themes of the work, character arcs, dead-ends, dropped threads, and convenient coincidences. Note scenes/plot points that are tent poles and shining stars, as well as any that are repetitive or extraneous. Think about what you want to keep and what you can dump.
Divide a large sheet of paper into 2 columns. On one side, write an outline for the story as-written. On the other side, write an improved outline: reorganize and consolidate plot points, strengthen character arcs, trim dead-ends and arbitrary fanservice (e.g., a previously fan-favorite character making a cameo), build in themes at the ground-level, and eliminate convenient coincidences (inconvenient ones can stay). This second column is now Your Outline.
Open a blank document and begin re-writing your story from the new outline. Don’t feel the need to cling to it, but try to stay alongside it. Don’t worry too much about craft at this stage; just get all the words on the page. You can keep the old version of the story open in the background and copy over any passages that you really can’t bear to part with, but I truly believe you will get the best results if you START OVER. Once you finish your new “first draft,” read it through once. Enjoy it. You made this!
Take a month off, then open the “first draft” document again. Read through it carefully. Note where the pacing drags. Note any scenes that don’t serve the main story. Note conversations or beats that go on too long. Note any moments that don’t have the impact they were supposed to. Then, take a hatchet to your baby. Everything unnecessary or unhelpful, cut it. Anywhere the pace is limping, convert showing to telling. Trim all conversations by about 20%. Find those passages you copied over from the original version—do they really fit? See if you can make the story work without them. Be strong. Be ruthless.
Send off for editing, beta-ing, and sensitivity reading. Ask questions about structure, pacing, themes, character arcs, harmful tropes, and plot holes. Also ask the “can you tell what this was a fanfic of?” question. Will likely require multiple rounds of revisions, but I promise it will be worth it. When all’s said and done, read through your story as a whole work of art. Recognize the significance of your accomplishment, and start thinking about where you want to publish it!
If this sounds like a lot of work…yes, it is. There’s a non-negligible amount of effort involved even with “easy mode,” and only you can decide what level of effort, if any, is worth it for you to take your story from fanfic to original fiction. And there’s nothing wrong with deciding to keep the story as fanfic! The vast majority of my fanfictions have remained fanfictions! But if you really want to do this, I hope I’ve at least given you an example of how it can be done.
A Master Guide to the Three Main Forms of Publishing
There are many ways to get published nowadays, but traditional, self, and hybrid are the three most popular, so here’s the gist of what you need to know for each:
Traditional Publishing
This type of publishing goes through a publishing house who often have their own editors, artists, marketing team, etc. to launch your book. They will make your cover for you, format and edit your book, nominate your book for awards and may organize events like a launch party, book signings, speaker roles at festivals etc. They are your book’s team!
Some publishing houses accept cold queries (pitches for your unpublished manuscript) from you, but many only accept queries from agents. Agents are not necessary for traditional publishing, but they can definitely help get you in front of some of the bigger publishing houses. In my opinion, I would recommend an agent for if you want writing to be your career, but would not recommend one if you’re just looking to publish one or two books.
To get an agent, you go through essentially the same process as you would trying to get a publishing house, except you’re sending your query to different agents instead. Querying is very, very difficult, tends to take a lot of time, and will force you to face many rejections. It’s important to be prepared for when you don’t encounter instant success.
If an agent likes your query letter, they may request your full manuscript, and if they like that, they may sign you on as a client. From here, the agent will take over all the work of sending your manuscript to publishing houses. They will also act as your representative to the publishing house, and will protect you from getting scammed or not getting the deal you deserve.
Most important to remember! You never have to pay for any of these services. The money works like this: You write a book, an agent believes in the book so they sell it to a publishing house—the agent takes a cut of those profits and you get the rest (this is called an advance). The publishing house then sells the book to the public, and any profit they make after your advance, they get a cut of, your agent gets a cut of, and then you get whatever is left.
Essentially: these people make money by selling your book, not from you. If you have to pay them for any reason, you are being scammed.
Pros of Trad Publishing:
You are not held liable for a large part of the work—marketing, cover art, formatting, etc.
You are more likely to see your book in large resellers (think Chapters or Barnes and Noble), and have it reach a wider audience
You are also more likely to be given further opportunities like events, interviews, or speaker roles at festivals, and you’re more likely to win awards.
You have legitimacy and credibility as an author, especially if you have an agent, to do more books in the future and perhaps move into bigger publishing houses and make larger advances. The longer you’re in the business, the more money you make.
Cons of Trad Publishing:
It is difficult as a first-time author, and takes a long time
Some of your creative control is taken from you (you may not be able to choose your own cover or your title, etc.)
Your book must be easily marketable for them to take a chance on you
You will likely not see very much money starting out
Self Publishing
Self publishing puts all of the work that a traditional publishing house does on your shoulders. You are responsible for the editing, the formatting, designing a cover, doing your own marketing, applying for awards (if you desire), etc. This means that all creative decisions are entirely up to you, but also, that any mistakes or poor choices reflect entirely on you.
There are many ways to self publish, but lately Amazon’s publishing service seems to be the easiest for authors. In other cases, you may want to design everything and then go to a printer in your area to print off copies to then sell on your website, or try to entice resellers to pick up.
In self publishing, you may have to pay upfront for everything (especially if you hire outside services to do some of the work for you), which can make it an expensive and risky endeavor. However, you also get all of the money from sales.
Pros of Self publishing:
You are fully in control of the final product
You can publish a book that others may not have seen potential in
You don’t have to share your profit with anyone, you may see more money starting off than a trad author
It takes less time
Cons of Self Publishing:
Your reach to audience is as much as you are able to market yourself (if you have a high social media following, you will sell more than if you don’t)
All of the work is up to you, which can be difficult and frustrating, especially in getting resellers
You may not be given the same sort of opportunities as trad authors
On that note, if you ever want to make the jump to trad publishing, self published manuscripts are sometimes not seen as incredibly legitimate or credible unless they sell amazingly well
Hybrid Publishing
This form of publishing takes the idea of self publishing, but hires out some of the work. For example, you may hire a publicity company to do your marketing for you, a graphic designer to make your cover, and an editor to do a proofread, and handle the rest of it yourself. If you desire, you can technically hire out basically every service needed. This can be somewhat of the best of both worlds between trad/self publishing, however, it’s also the most expensive.
Pros of Hybrid:
You still have a majority of creative control given you are paying the companies to do what you want
A professional can take on some of the tasks that you are not as confident or skilled in
Cons of Hybrid:
It is expensive—unlike trad publishing, these companies will expect you to pay them upfront for their services, so you are risking not making back the money when your book is ready to sell
You may have to manage a lot of different people and companies—it requires intense organization and deadlines!
On that note, it is also up to you to determine if a company is credible and does good work—just getting any professional is not a guarantee that the work will be high quality
If you have any more questions about publishing, feel free to leave them in my inbox! :-)
Ok some serious shit, I'd really appreciate everyone's advice on this if you've got some to share.
A few months back I wrote something and I've been wanting to publish it since then. Issue is, the story is kinda too long for a magazine/short story collection, but too short to be published on its own (a bit more than 17.000 words, technically a novellette I am told).
It's also a noir story with some slight supernatural elements so also a very specific subgenre.
I've been putting this off for months but it's high time I actually did something to try to get it published aside from sending it to places that I know won't even look at it. So I ask you:
- Does anyone know of a publication that might fit this story?
- Should I instead bite the bullet and write more so I can just publish a standalone novellette collection?
- Should I self-publish? Or just online? What platform would be good?
Thanks to everyone actually taking the time to answer this btw, too kind
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
âś“ Live Streamingâś“ Interactive Chatâś“ Private Showsâś“ HD Qualityâś“ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Hey, Katydid. I am a MHA fan fic Writer who decided to write a original science-fantasy story. Some of my friends redirected me to you mentioning that you also published your own book after starting as a fan fic writer and I wanted some tips. (sorry for not DMing you directly and posting the ask as an anon. I'm a bit anxious about asking.)
I'm happy the answer the ask publicly, perhaps it will be useful to other people. This is an incredibly complicated question but I will do my best. I can only give you the CliffsNotes version based on my personal experience, so I would highly encourage you to read some articles online and pick up a book on traditional publishing. (I know nothing about self publishing, a whole different game, but there are books on that too.) Another
Step One: I would highly recommend finding a writing group or critique partner. Moving from fanfic to original writing means that your readers no longer automatically know your characters and world building. Beta readers are invaluable in helping you figure out what parts of your story might be confusing readers. I found my first group on Meetup, there are many other places if you google it.
Step Two: To get traditionally published, you need a literary agent. Large and mid-sized publishers usually only accept submissions from agents. After you finish the book, you will write a query letter (which is a blurb for your book, like the back cover). You send the letter to agents, who all have different guidelines for how to send submissions. If they like are interested, they will request part or all of your book to read. If you make it past that stage, they will offer to represent you.
There are many articles online about how to write a query letter. There are also many databases of agents. Personally I like Manuscript Wish List, where many agents list what kind of books they are looking for. Instructions for how to submit to them will be on their websites.
It's wise to do a little research into literary agents. Anyone can create a website claiming to be a literary agent. The biggest sign of a scam would be an agent asking you for money. In traditional publishing, no agent or publisher will ever ask you for money, the money flows toward you not away from you.
Step Three: This step is optional. There are online contests for submitting to agents. Writing conferences have opportunities to pitch to agents (as well as useful writing advice.) If you don't have the money for conferences though, there are lots of great writing advice books at the library.
Step Four: Be patient. I had to submit a hundred queries to obtain an agent. I would recommend sending out queries in small batches, because if you don't get any requests for pages with the first ten or so, that is a sign you need to revise and improve your cover letter. It's a very competitive business.
Step Five: A literary agent will handle figuring out what publishers to submit your book to and handle the submissions. At this point you once again need to be patient. Some authors fail at the publisher submission stage, which is heartbreaking after so much work to obtain an agent. Fair warning, most authors write more than one book before getting traditionally published. My first book was unable to get published, although someday I would like to go back, improve it, and try again. My greatest advice would be persistence.
So, What’s the Difference Between a Beta Reader and an Editor? Should I Ever Pay for a Beta Reader?
This article will be answering the following 10 questions:
1. Is a beta reader a type of editor?
2. Should I EVER pay a beta reader?
3. Do I HAVE to pay beta readers?
4. Should I pay someone who is reading entirely at their leisure?
5. Does paying a beta reader guarantee better feedback?
6. Should a beta reader identify problems?
7. Should I pay a beta reader to edit my manuscript?
8. If I can afford only one paid service, should I choose beta reading or editing?
9. Is asking for volunteer beta readers exploitative or elitist?
10. How do I know if a paid beta reading service is a scam?
Before we answer these questions, we need solid definitions for several terms. The following definitions reflect either established professional classifications or widely accepted publishing usage. Terminology can vary between individuals and businesses, so these particular definitions will be used consistently throughout this article.
The following definitions are taken from the Editorial Freelancers Association.
Beta reader:
Beta readers review manuscripts and offer authors feedback and insight, identifying errors, plot problems, inconsistencies, or unclear sections in the work. They serve as a test audience, representing the target readership, and can help identify issues like overused tropes or missing elements. Some beta readers may have particular expertise in the manuscript’s subject matter.
-Source (Editorial Freelancers Association)
Developmental editor:
Developmental editors (also called “substantive,” “structural,” or “content” editors) deal with content, organization, and genre considerations. After reviewing a manuscript, they may provide an overall critique of the content in a “manuscript evaluation,” or they may provide the author with a revision (or “editorial” or “edit”) letter that outlines the big-picture issues and offers suggestions for how to address them.
-Source (Editorial Freelancers Association)
Line editor:
Line editors work at the sentence or paragraph level of a manuscript. Like copyeditors, they correct errors, but their main focus is on improving the language and style of the text. Line editing may be performed as a separate service, in conjunction with developmental editing after big-picture issues have been addressed, or in conjunction with copyediting.
-Source (Editorial Freelancers Association)
Copy editor:
Perhaps the most familiar kind of editing, copyediting involves correcting spelling, grammar, usage, and punctuation, checking cross-references, and preparing the style sheets that guide consistency and accuracy across the manuscript.
-Source (Editorial Freelancers Association)
Proofreader:
Proofreading is among the last stages of getting a manuscript ready for publication. Proofreaders check for typographical errors and formatting mistakes. In traditional publishing, proofreading is a review of a publisher’s “proof”—the document that is intended to be printed—whereby the proofreader compares the latest stage of the project to the previous one, making sure all changes have been made correctly.
-Source (Editorial Freelancers Association)
These services can overlap, particularly because freelancers may combine multiple forms of editing into one package. That is why writers should always examine the exact scope of a service rather than relying entirely on the title being used.
Now, onto the questions.
1. Is a beta reader a type of editor?Â
No. A beta reader serves as a test audience, reporting problems and reactions from the perspective of the book’s intended readership. An editor professionally evaluates or changes the manuscript through services such as developmental, line, or copy editing. One person may offer both services, but beta reading itself is not a form of editing. Terminology has evolved and is not universal. Writer Beware reserves the traditional term for unpaid, informal reading, while the EFA now lists beta reading among the professional services its members provide. So yes, it can be a professional service. However, it still classifies professional beta reading services under “Reading,” not “Editing.”
Writer Beware describes traditional beta readers as unpaid, informal readers rather than hired professionals, while noting that fee-based services increasingly use the term “beta reading.” I would love to provide a full quote, but the SFWA page explicitly says its contents may not be reproduced without permission. I can, however, link the article:
-Source (Writer Beware, hosted by the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Association)
“Where can I find a beta reader or critique partner?” Without doubt, that’s the second most frequent question I receive from writers, right after where do I find a good editor?. This can be a tough question to answer for the simple reason that a beta reader or critique partner isn’t someone you simply vet and hire, like you would a freelance editor. Rather, this is a relationship you build, just as you would build any important friendship.
-Source (K. M. Weiland via Helping Writers Become Authors)
2. Should I EVER pay a beta reader?
Yes!! Although beta reading has traditionally been voluntary, “paid beta reading” is now an established commercial service. It can be useful when the reader promises a deadline, a completed read, responses to specific questions, or another clearly defined deliverable. The important distinction is that the service remains reader-response feedback rather than professional editing.
3. Do I HAVE to pay beta readers?
No. You owe payment only when you and the reader have agreed in advance that the arrangement is paid. Volunteer beta reading, reciprocal manuscript exchanges, critique groups, and friends reading for one another are all established practices. No one is obligated to beta read, but freely volunteering to do so does not become exploitation merely because money is absent.
In some cases, people used beta readers because they couldn’t afford a paid professional. Betas were seen as an alternative way to get an independent, impartial view of their work. For other people, beta readers complemented the feedback they received from paid editors, preceding or following their input; that is, they used—and valued—both.
-Source (Barbara Linn Probst, via Jane Friedman)
4. Should I pay someone who is reading entirely at their leisure?
I mean, if you want to. Personally, I would be hesitant to pay for an informal arrangement in which the reader has no deadline, no agreed-upon feedback requirements, and no obligation to finish the manuscript. That does not mean their opinion has no value. A reader abandoning the book can itself reveal something useful! However, if money is changing hands, the writer should understand exactly what is being purchased. Payment makes the most sense when it comes with defined expectations and deliverables. Never pay someone for purportedly human beta reading if they are secretly feeding the manuscript into an AI system and passing its output off as their own feedback. That is deceptive and is not the service you purchased.
5. Does paying a beta reader guarantee better feedback?
Unfortunately, no. Payment may make the reader more reliable, but it does not automatically make them more perceptive, knowledgeable, or honest. A paid reader may feel pressure to satisfy a customer, while an unpaid friend may soften their criticism to protect the writer’s feelings. Neither arrangement guarantees complete objectivity. Writers should look for readers who understand the genre, communicate clearly, and feel comfortable providing respectful but honest reactions. Also be aware of scams wherein a beta reader secretly feeds your manuscript to an AI to generate feedback in order to be paid for work they did not do. If they openly state this is how they operate, then you are wasting your money. Even if you wanted AI-generated feedback, a free account with an AI program such as ChatGPT can provide this exact same service at no charge.
6. Should a beta reader identify problems?
Yes! A beta reader can absolutely mention plot holes, contradictions, confusing passages, continuity issues, or mistakes they notice. The distinction is that they are usually reporting those problems from a reader’s perspective. They are not necessarily expected to diagnose their underlying cause, develop a revision strategy, or correct the manuscript directly. A beta reader might say, “I lost interest during these chapters.” A developmental editor might explain why those chapters are losing momentum and recommend what could be removed, rearranged, or developed.
7. Should I pay a beta reader to edit my manuscript?
No, not unless that person is also offering a clearly defined editorial service and has the relevant skills, training, or demonstrated editorial experience to perform it. Correcting prose, restructuring the story, conducting a detailed grammar review, or developing a professional revision plan goes beyond ordinary beta reading. A person may offer both beta reading and editing, but those should be presented as distinct services with clear expectations, qualifications, and prices. Calling editorial work “beta reading” can make it difficult for writers to evaluate what they are actually purchasing.
8. If I can afford only one paid service, should I choose beta reading or editing?
That depends on what the manuscript needs. If you mainly need to know how ordinary readers experience the story, beta feedback may be enough. If you need professional help understanding and correcting weaknesses in the structure, prose, consistency, or mechanics, you probably need the appropriate kind of editor. Beta readers and editors are both valuable. They simply answer different questions. A beta reader tells you what the reading experience was, while an editor helps you understand what may need to change and, depending on the service, how to change it.
9. Is asking for volunteer beta readers exploitative or elitist?
No, not inherently. A person may freely volunteer to read a manuscript, just as writers may exchange manuscripts or participate in unpaid critique groups. The arrangement becomes unfair when someone is pressured, misled about the amount of work involved, or expected to provide extensive editorial or specialized professional labor without compensation. The important factors are consent, clear expectations, and an honest description of the service, not a rule that every reading relationship must involve money.
10. How do I know if a paid beta reading service is a scam?
Look for clear deliverables, pricing, deadlines, written terms, and an explanation of how your manuscript will be handled. Sample feedback or independent reviews can also help, but beta reading has no universal licensing, certification, or training requirement, so virtually anyone can offer it as a paid service. To say that a beta reader MUST have a particular qualification to provide ANY service is elitist. A provider’s lack of skill or experience does not by itself make the service a scam unless they misrepresent their abilities, conceal important details, fail to deliver what was promised, or secretly substitute AI output for an advertised human reading. Poor feedback may be disappointing or overpriced, but the clearest signs of a scam are deception or taking payment without providing the agreed service.
Paid beta reading services typically have a much lower price tag than developmental editors. The main difference between paid beta readers and paid editors (in general) is that beta readers will tell you what’s not working but not necessarily how to fix it. They’re skilled readers, not writing instructors.
There are individual beta readers you can hire directly, and there are services that act as a middleman to match you with beta readers they know. The beta reader or beta reading service may have its own list of items and/or allow you to specify what you’d like to focus on. Here too, there’s a wide variety in the depth and scope of feedback.
In my experience, a beta reader tends to be most useful after a major revision. The professional mentor will help you to shape the story; the beta reader will let you know if you’ve succeeded and where more work may be needed.
-Source (Barbara Linn Probst via Jane Friedman)
The important thing is not whether paid beta reading is universally good or bad. What is important is whether the service being offered matches what your manuscript needs and whether you understand exactly what you are paying for.
In August we wrote a beginners guide to copyright, in which we talk about whether you need it, how to get it if you do, and what information you should include in a copyright page.
We've even given you a downloadable template that you can customise to your needs for both fiction, and non-fiction books! Click the link below.
Not sure how to protect your work? We've put together this beginners guide to copyright for creative writers including templates you can use