The Journal of microscopy and natural science. 1890.
"The organism named Acineta mystacina, by Ehrenberg, was said by Mr. Gosse to be merely one of the developmental stages of a larger Vorticellid."
Internet Archive
seen from France
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Austria
seen from Mexico
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from China
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from United States
The Journal of microscopy and natural science. 1890.
"The organism named Acineta mystacina, by Ehrenberg, was said by Mr. Gosse to be merely one of the developmental stages of a larger Vorticellid."
Internet Archive

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âĸ No registration required âĸ HD streaming
Spirostomum, photographed 1/14/26 at 250x (left) and 1/17/26 at 1000x (right). Among the most charismatic of the protozoans (or at least, as charismatic as a protozoan can be... they're all charismatic to me!) due to how large they get. You can see these folks without a microscope! That is, until they contract to a fraction of their size. It's done in a spiral motion, hence the name. The ones in these photos are pretty large, but ones I've found more recently have been quite small. Lots of variation! They can reproduce sexually by conjugation, but tend to do so with similarly sized individuals. I wonder how they tell?
Phacus, photographed 3/26/26 at 1000x total magnification. Another euglenoid that is immediately recognizable. Though the genus is very large, that leaf shape is a dead give away. I think I've only ever mixed them up with Monomorphina, and that's only because those guys are so small and never stop moving around. But really, once you get a good look at them, the difference is clear. Always nice when a euglenoid makes ID easy on me. Not all of them are like that...
Why do people keep naming slime molds after food? Like seriously, there's the chocolate tube slime mold, pretzel slime mold, tapioca pudding slime mold, scrambled egg slime mold. Do people just really wanna eat slime molds?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âĸ No registration required âĸ HD streaming
Exciting news for a niche audience... I will now be posting my microscope photographs to the wonderful world of tumblr. Flagellates!! Ciliates!! Roundworms and flatworms!! Copepods!! Diatoms and desmids!! Algae of every color, colonial or solitary!! Find it here under the tag #microscopy and nowhere else. Doodles sometimes included.
Identification done by me and the good folk of inaturalist (where I am balimaria as well). All photos are my own and any mistakes, ID or otherwise, are certainly my own as well.
Lepocinclis oxyuris var. helicoidea. Photographed 3/26/26 at 100x and 250x total magnification. Any member of the Euglenid class is a treat to come across, but this one especially so for its large size and slow movement, making it easy to photograph. Very lovely striations and long, rod-shaped paramylon grains, and of course that long tailpiece that is so often a feature of this genus.
åįåįŠčĒŋæģ
2026/03/01
äģãžã§čĻŗå¯ããĻããããŠãŗã¯ããŗããã§ãã¯čĄ¨ãĢããĻãžããåæ°´å ãã¨ãĢč˛åãããĻãåˇĻãĢããŠãŗã¯ããŗãæ°´æŖ˛å°åįŠãŽååããĢãŋãĢãã§įž åãããã¯ã ããããŽäģ˛éãã¨ãĢåããĻæ¸ããĻãããã§ãããŠããããį¨ŽéĄãåĸããã¨ã¯æããĒããĻãæĸããŽãĢãä¸čĻå´ã§ããæ¤į´ĸãããģãŠã§ã¯ãĒãã¨æããããĒããŽäģ˛éã垊įŋãã§ãããŽã§ããŽãžãžäŊŋãŖãĻããžããããããããé ãĢããĻããã°č¯ããŖãããĒã¨æãäģæĨããŽé ããĄãĒãŋãĢããĢãŧãŊãĢãĒãŗã§åĻåã¨įšåž´ãåēãĻãããããĢããĻããžãã
ããŽãã§ãã¯čĄ¨ãããããĄããŖã¨ããžãæ´įã§ããĒãããŽãčãä¸ã
The current study revealed to contamination of fresh water with twelve genus and species of parasites and protozoa: Ascaris lumbricoides (28%), Toxocara canis (7.5%), Strongyloides sp. (9.3%), Rhabditae larvae (8%), Hymenolepis nana (18.6%), Cryptosporidium sp. (33.3%), Giardia lamblia (22.6%), Entamoeba histolytica (12%) , Entamoeba coli (20.6%), Balantidium coli (11.8%), Coleps hirtus (30%), and Nyctotherus ovalis (10.6%) in all studied areas for the first time. Significant differences at the rate of pollution in fresh water with parasites and protozoa among studied areas.