seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Mexico
seen from Chile
seen from Israel
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Italy
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada
PolitiFact
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Editor-in-chief Katie Sanders said the fact-checking website is showing why lies "have consequences on real people."
Ben Blanchet at HuffPost:
PolitiFact, the Poynter Instituteâs fact-checking website, said farewell to its annual âLie of the Yearâ selection on Monday and decided to name 2025 the âYear of the Liesâ instead. PolitiFact editor-in-chief Katie Sanders explained that while the site typically drops a year-end report to ârecognize a statement, collection of statements or theme that is worthy of note for a consequential undermining of reality,â the process of singling out just one lie in such an abysmal year for truth seemed insufficient. âWe are stepping back this year and recalibrating the Lie of the Year â focusing less on the offenders who perpetuate the falsehoods, and more on those who are hurt by them,â Sanders wrote in a post to the site.
PolitiFact readers were asked to pick from several choices for this yearâs âLie of the Year,â a title the site has used since 2009. Among the selections were President Donald Trumpâs âpants on fireâ justification for boat strikes off the Venezuelan coast, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahuâs talk of âno starvationâ in Gaza and White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavittâs claim that the presidentâs tariffs were a âtax cutâ for Americans.
PolitiFact jettisons its usual Lie Of The Year, replacing it with the âYear Of The Liesâ section.
Editor-in-chief Katie Sanders said the fact-checking website is showing why lies "have consequences on real people."
PolitiFact, the Poynter Instituteâs fact-checking website, said farewell to its annual âLie of the Yearâ selection on Monday and decided to name 2025 the âYear of the Liesâ instead.
PolitiFact editor-in-chief Katie Sanders explained that while the site typically drops a year-end report to ârecognize a statement, collection of statements or theme that is worthy of note for a consequential undermining of reality,â the process of singling out just one lie in such an abysmal year for truth seemed insufficient.
âWe are stepping back this year and recalibrating the Lie of the Year â focusing less on the offenders who perpetuate the falsehoods, and more on those who are hurt by them,â Sanders wrote in a post to the site.
âItâs time to revisit the basics of why itâs important to call out lies. Theyâre more than just words. Lies harm livelihoods and families.â
Trump Weird News - Reagan: Tariffs Are Bad...
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Fact-Check on the Presidential Debate
Source:
It started off friendly. Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump shook hands to start their first
End result:
Donald Trump: 0 true, 13 false 3 of which are "pants on fire" level
Kamala Harris: 1 true, 5 false only 1 of which is just plain false; the others contain at least some truth
Follow live CBS News debate fact checks tonight of Trump's vice presidential running mate, JD Vance, and Kamala Harris' VP pick, Tim Walz.
PolitiFact is live fact checking the VP debate. Check it out!
Social media posts shared a headline that was enough to make dog lovers panic. "Climate activists vow to slaughter milli
My latest for PolitiFact - finally, a really easy fact-check.
The claim is that "climate activists vow to slaughter millions of dogs to reduce carbon pawprint."
They even "cite" a CNN article.
The CNN article says literally nothing about anyone even faintly suggesting anyone kill anything. There's no "vow," there's no "millions of dogs." It's just a study saying "there is a climate impact of pets, there are some ways to reduce the impact, I'm not even saying you should do them, and none of them involve killing them."
