Interference images obtained by using an apparatus sold in the catalog. Price list no. 50. Max Kohl A.G. 1909-11.
Internet Archive

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Germany
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from Russia

seen from Russia
seen from China
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Spain

seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States
Interference images obtained by using an apparatus sold in the catalog. Price list no. 50. Max Kohl A.G. 1909-11.
Internet Archive

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I'm concerned about the increasing amount of misinformation among the liberal media and liberal/left internet users
I happened to be in the right circles at the right time to watch a generation of boys and young adults get radicalized in real time in the internet forums and gaming communities. This was a concerted effort from multiple groups--not really working with each other, but certainly working in tandem. It suited the far right groups and Russian troll farms and other similar groups just fine to be doing the same thing for a while, because what they were doing worked.
I watched as it progressed from gaming forums and places like 4chan and 8chan and kiwifarms to mainstream YouTubers like PewDiePie to people like Andrew Tate and Joe Rogan. Online users originally flooded the scene with "edgy" humor that crossed the line to genuine bad-faith jokes (hate speech and threats and old Nazi propaganda about girls, blacks, Jews, gays, you name it) but was protected by the defense of "it's just ironic" or "it's just edgy humor".
Okay, edgelords. You can make that argument.
But the humor you repeat becomes engrained. Irony turns genuine. Jokes become patterns. Patterns become habits. Habits become worldviews. And then you get pulled into other things through the edgy memes your content creators share. And then you're getting interested in technofeudalist philosphy, and the great replacement theory, and inceldom, and the divine right of kings, and the Crusades being not a bad idea actually, and anti-wokeness, and the manosphere, and the deep state, and straight up conspiracy theories.
And then we end up with Gamergate. And then we end up with Pizzagate. And then we end up with QAnon. And then we end up with the conspiracy theories spreading from the teenage boys, Britebart, Storm Front, foreign bot farms, trolls, and the far right to millions and millions of regular-adults in the United States.
And then we end up with all this.
everyone on twitter trying to make that minnesota lady into either a saint or a demon. it's all so tiring.
Whenever I leave the house, upon my return, I ask hubby, "What that N done done now!!!!! Yes, the "done done" Sometimes he'll call me before I get home and he'll say "Guess what that N did now..."
This mofo ain't nothing but a thug....which has always been the white folks code word for "N"....Well, you got you a real one in there now.
The United States of Embarrassment. trump lies like the air he breathes! U.S. presidents have occasionally "lied or misled the country", but none were a " compulsive serial liar" like Trump “We expect politicians to stretch the truth. But Trump is a whole different animal", because trump "lies as a policy", and "will make up and say literally anything" to satisfy his supporters, his online misinformation machine or himself and divide the Country by design.
Helical liquid crystals can flip light's chirality under ultralow electric fields
The direction in which the electromagnetic field of circularly polarized light rotates can be easily reversed by applying a voltage, RIKEN researchers have demonstrated. This could enable a new generation of optical devices based on circularly polarized light. The work is published in two papers in the journal Advanced Materials. Why circular polarization matters Polarized sunglasses produce light that is polarized along a single direction. But some special devices can generate light with a polarization that rotates as the light propagates. Such circularly polarized light is useful for many applications, including spectroscopy, satellite communications, stereoscopy and microscopy.
Read more.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I feel like there’s a lack of nuance when it comes to the discussion of “fantasy racism”
especially when someone does an allegory of it poorly (like Bright or Detroit Become Human) or makes some really stupid takes on it (like that one extra credits video) because a lot of the time when that happens, people tend to veer too far in the other direction, saying that we shouldn't ever feel sympathy for fictional creatures because they instantly assume it's like Bright or DBH and that blah blah "the west has fallen and billions must die" (like I swear to god, I half expect a lot of them to say that...)
Personally I prefer when races aren’t ontologically evil, but I must stress the word PREFER in this case, because I can like stuff that does have ontologically evil creatures (good example being Redwall)
And honestly what often bothers me more with sympathetic orcs and demons and stuff is how most of the time they’ll make them more human looking and/or “cute” and/or approachable looking, because that feels kind of antithetical to making them sympathetic in the first place, and I’m not saying they have to be absolutely nightmarish or ugly, I’m just saying I’d prefer them to be a bit more “beastly” like having orcs still have their tusks and stuff
Another thing that kind of bothers me is when some people equate races having inalienable traits with them being good or evil, but that’s not what that means, not strictly anyway, and it bothers me because A. These are fictional species, so why should them having certain qualities be a bad thing? And B. Ironically I feel it’s actually more regressive in some sense, obviously in real life races don’t have any inalienable qualities, but there are people that do (like me) like if you were to make me not Autistic, I wouldn’t be the same person
And even if we lived in a world where races DID have inalienable qualities, that wouldn’t make treating them like garbage or any of the other horrible shit that’s been done throughout history justified
Also sidenote: I saw a few people respond to that one Extra Credits video about how just having people who choose to do evil (like slavers, Nazis, etc.) be the enemies instead of just an evil race is better, and a couple people were baffled and/or disgusted by that but honestly… I don’t really disagree… I mean I don’t think it’s “better” per se, but like if I shoot a Nazi in a game I’m not gonna feel bad for him, that’s not to say you can’t explore whatever their personal motivations are and who they are as people, but if we AREN’T focusing on that in the narrative and it’s just an FPS game who cares?
The nation's conflicts boil down to belonging versus threat
David Pakman:
It has become almost cliché to say that America is deeply divided. Politicians repeat it, cable news thrives on it, and most people will nod along to the idea without hesitation. That part is easy. The harder part is answering why. What is the actual fault line that cuts the country into two almost perfectly opposed camps? There are plenty of ideas, but most of them fall apart when you look closely.
So if none of these explanations quite add up, what does?
Here is what I want to propose: The real divide is not primarily about race, class, religion, or geography. It is about belonging versus threat.
One side looks at the country and says: change is progress. Expanding the circle of who belongs makes us stronger. The other side looks at those same changes and says: this is an invasion, a loss, a threat to our way of life. Seen through this lens, every major fight in American politics begins to make sense. Immigration is a perfect example. On one side, newcomers are part of the American story. We all belong. On the other, immigrants are “invaders” who are dangerous, criminals, or out to replace the people who were here first. Race fits the same pattern. One view says diversity strengthens democracy. The other casts diversity as synonymous with crime, decline, or societal collapse. Consider abortion. For those who support abortion rights, the issue is about women fully belonging as equal citizens, trusted to make their own medical and moral decisions. For opponents, abortion represents a threat to the traditional family, to religious values, even to demographic survival. Gender and sexuality line up in the same way. One perspective celebrates more people living openly as progress. The other frames LGBTQ rights as an attack on the family, on children, and on masculinity itself. Even religion divides along these lines. Belonging means pluralism, the freedom to believe or not believe. Threat means Christianity must dominate or else it will be under siege. Democracy itself is at stake. Belonging says that everyone gets a vote and even if your side loses, you still belong in the political community. Threat says that if the “wrong” people vote, then the system must be rigged and the rules must be broken. The same is true for economics. Belonging says we are in this together and everyone deserves a share. Threat says “they” are taking what belongs to “us,” whether it is jobs, healthcare, or government assistance.
David Pakman wrote that the real fissure in America is between a belonging and threat mindset.