The "random people" showed more knowledge about the difference between aristocracy and the working class than you. Also she understands JKR's intentions. You don't.
And I've read your posts, and that's exactly why I'm asking. You don't actually analyze. You just chuck out references as an excuse to seem like you're spouting something relevant, but whether you know it or not, your opinions are rooted solely in what you believe.
Moreover, Rowling constructs Voldemort and Harry as representing two archetypal forms of masculinity: the noble knight versus the tyrannical god-king. Harry embodies the "good" masculine ideal of the protective, self-sacrificing, brave knight, while Voldemort represents masculinity's darkest potential when untethered from empathy or moral restraint. This isn't a subversion of masculine archetypes but a a reinforcement of them, positioning both hero and villain firmly within traditional masculine frameworks while simply coding one as virtuous and the other as monstrous. Rowling's moral universe depends on this binary remaining intact and legible to her audience.
Someone’s mad because their internalized misogyny doesn’t let them recognize gender stereotypes in male characters. By the way, the fact that Tom is feminine-coded doesn’t make him any less binary, since that concept is tied to the most basic patriarchal stereotypes. But once again, you’re talking without having the slightest idea — no bibliographic references, nothing — just random Tumblr quotes, because you’re so dumb and so basic that you don’t even have your own discourse. A shame, really. I recommend you read some of the authors I mentioned instead of basing your theoretical perceptions on posts from here, it might help you not be such an idiot
