#peacefic

About Us

System classifiers (the key ones, at least): mediple | monoconscious | specutien | modular | adaptive

[Our system boundaries] [Frequent posters - will update regularly] [Post that explains our syscourse stances pretty well]

We're looking for plurality resources in languages other than English or from countries outside the Anglosphere to add to our guide (last updated: 6 June 2026 in our timezone). If you know any, or are willing to help translate the guide, please tell us through asks.

Introduction

Hey there! We're Fermi — a system whose headcount fluctuates and whose headmates tend to have a lot in common. We also run @cyclogenic-culture-is. We're mostly traumagenic and relate to OSDD-1a or P-DID systems, but we're no longer sure if a psychiatric diagnosis — and all that entails — would be helpful for us. What we are officially diagnosed with is autism (level 2 support needs) and ADHD. Basically, it's like we have "dissociative identity" with less of the "disorder."

Bodily, we're an older teenager — still under 18, i.e. underage in most countries including where we live.

We are endo-friendly, even if we forget to tag individual posts as such. (Personally, we dislike using pro/anti terms.) Anyone can interact regardless of personal syscourse stances, but if you harass or fakeclaim anyone based on their system origins, you will not have a good time here.

As more countries introduce mandatory age verification to the Internet, there may come a time when we stop posting here, even if we're ""old enough"" to be on social media. We cannot risk our face or ID being linked to an account that posts about plurality. Should Tumblr ever announce such changes, we'll announce our plans for this account — maybe move to some sort of personal website.

Neutralship, often known as ship-neutral, refers to those who are "neutral" or unconcerned with shipcourse. They may be pro- or anti-leaning, or completely unaligned.

Neutralship also means your anti harassment. That implies you will not bother someone about their fandom preferences, or pass judgment on their fantasies or ships.

Neufic - those who identify as neufic may be pro- or anti-leaning, or wholly unaligned; they are neutral on fiction and do not engage in ship discourse

And for short, we are called newts.

The purple flags are peacefic. The pink is neutralship.

Peacefic Emoji combos - ☮🦢, ☮📖, 🌈☮, 🌈🦢, 🦢🌙,

Neutralship emoji combos - 🎀 🫧, 🎀🌙 , 🫧🎀 , 🌈🎀, 🌈 🫧, 🌈🌙

Our host experiences the bulk of our moral OCD symptoms and anti's have put so much shit in his head that he gets panic attacks just from me liking a post made by someone who is pro-ship

In all technicality if we were to use shipcourse related labels we would fall under pro-ship and probably darkship, and maybe others, and again, anti's have put so much shit in his head that he can't help but spiral after interacting with works of pure fiction because some dumbass strangers online said that if someone enjoys certain fictional content then they are a horrible person

I also don't understand how there are anti's who say thought crimes don't exist and then tell people if they like certain fictional scenarios that in no way involve real people then they are horrible disgusting people

Pro para, thought crimes don't exist, and supportive of people with OCD up until it's not your specific cup of tea, then it's all thrown out the window

Just don't make sense and it pisses me off

Numerous people have tried to avoid this mess but have been dragged into it, having a label forced on them despite not understanding or being too uninterested to participate. However, when people refuse to take a side, they risk facing harassment. People have been stalked, doxxed, or have committed suicide because of this nearly 10-year-old online war, but antis and proshippers have only doubled down on their fighting. They act as if they have something “important” to prove, trying to force the other to surrender as if they’ll be “rewarded” for their foolishness, ignoring the harm they’ve caused throughout the years.

I’m glad I left the anti-proship discourse because my online experience has been enjoyable and calmer since I have. This fighting between antis and proshippers must stop because no one benefits from the stress and harassment it’s causing.

I agree that the conflict is exhausting and that no one should have a label forced on them just so everyone can slot them into a category to judge them and treat them badly.

But—correct me if I'm wrong, with whatever evidence you'd like to send, but—I find it strange to suggest that proshippers and antishippers are equally at fault for there being constant fighting. This all began because people were doing fandom and shipping like normal and then other people started assigning moral weight to it until they saw fit to attack people who shipped "wrong". Then, it only got worse and worse and now we're at a point where antishippers are often so vicious that they'll do quite literally anything to hurt "bad" shippers, and proshippers are so on edge that they won't concede anything at all and view even innocent criticism of fiction as an attack.

But why wouldn't they be so defensive? I'm not saying they shouldn't try to better differentiate between an attack and a disagreement, but I understand how difficult that is to do when it feels like the meanings of those words have been torn to shreds anyway.

There absolutely are proshippers who go too far, harass others, and make "the discourse" their entire personality online. And that sucks. But if they're acting like that, it's most often born out of the years of unprompted abuse they've witnessed or even faced themselves, and we all know abuse causes strange and/or extreme defense responses to innocuous things.

I simply can't see both sides as equally accountable. The "important thing" proshippers are trying to prove is that they shouldn't be treated so horribly and that the average fan shouldn't just play along when someone writes a callout and tells everyone that they HAVE to block and avoid that person if they want to keep their own reputation in tact.